Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

Please provide the following information:

1. As to what, if any, portion of the Period did the Bank determine the monthly principal amounts set forth above by reference to account analysis statements?

By reference to the Alternative Procedure?

2. If any reference was made to the Alternative Procedure, does the Bank have in its possession its availability schedules (if any) for the portion of the Period for which such reference was made?

Does it have the availability schedules for any of its correspondent banks through which Hutton deposited items Which banks? may have been cleared?

Does it have the availability schedules for any Federal Reserve Bank or Regional Check Processing Center through which Hutton deposited items may have been cleared?

Period?

3. Does the Bank have in its possession any of its schedule(s) of service fees in effect during the Which ones?

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

On the

came

the

day of

[ocr errors]

of

nineteen hundred and

before me personally

to me known, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that (s)he is

the Bank described in the foregoing instrument; that (s)he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said Bank; and that (s)he did execute said instrument pursuant to such authorization.

Notary Public

To be filed in duplicate; one copy each to:

Office of the Special Master

P.O. Box 899

Scranton, PA 18501

E.F. Hutton & Company Inc.
Bank Restitution Program
P.O. Box 633

Bowling Green Station
New York, NY 10004

[blocks in formation]

In view of the fact that you have not responded to our April 4, 1984 letter, you may consider our offer to negotiate immunity withdrawn.

Very truly yours,

DDQ:BVO:np

DAVID DART QUEEN

United States Attorney

Bend VO Fear

BERNARD V. O'HARE, III
Assistant U.S. Attorney

Please provide the following information:

1. As to what, if any, portion of the Period did the Bank determine the monthly principal amounts set forth above by reference to account analysis statements?

By reference to the Alternative Procedure?

2. If any reference was made to the Alternative Procedure, does the Bank have in its possession its availability schedules (if any) for the portion of the Period for which such reference was made?

Does it have the availability schedules for any of its correspondent banks through which Hutton deposited items may have been cleared? Which banks?

Does it have the availability schedules for any Federal Reserve Bank or Regional Check Processing Center through which Hutton deposited items may have been cleared?

Period?

3. Does the Bank have in its possession any of its schedule(s) of service fees in effect during the Which ones?

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

came

the

day of

of

nineteen hundred and

before me personally

to me known, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that (s)he is the Bank described in the foregoing instrument; that (s)he was authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said Bank; and that (s)he did execute said instrument pursuant to such authorization.

Notary Public

To be filed in duplicate; one copy each to:

Office of the Special Master

P.O. Box 899
Scranton, PA 18501

E.F. Hutton & Company Inc.
Bank Restitution Program

P.O. Box 633

Bowling Green Station

New York, NY 10004

[blocks in formation]

Thank you for your letter dated April 9, 1984, which was received in this office on April 13, 1984. You may consider our April 4, 1984 offer to negotiate immunity withdrawn.

Very truly yours,

DDQ:BVO: np

DAVID DART QUEEN

United States Attorney

Bend VO

BERNARD V. O'HARE, III
Assistant U.S. Attorney

[blocks in formation]

This firm represents E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. and E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. (collectively "Hutton") inTM connection with a certain investigation apparently being conducted by a Grand Jury in the Middle District of Pennsyl

vania.

On May 18 and today I discussed with you the several subpoenae issued by the Grand Jury to various Hutton employees and branch offices and the serious difficulties we were having in complying with the very broad nationwide documentary demands as well as the demand for individuals to appear before the Grand Jury on Monday, May 24, 1982.

as

You advised me during our first conversation that Hutton could treat the subpoena addressed toprotective in nature and requiring Hutton to preserve and retain all existing responsive documents but that you do not expect those documents to be produced by Hutton next Monday. You further advised me that it will be unnecessary for

to actually appear on May 24, 1982.

« ForrigeFortsett »