 Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation, unless they are so clear, strong, and imperative, that no other meaning can be annexed to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied.  The Kentucky Law Reporter - Side 627redigert av - 1895Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 508 sider
...was late collector of the customs for the district of Petersburgh, in the state of Virginia. Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation,...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. This rule ought especially to be adhered to, when such a construction... | |
 | New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1839 - 658 sider
...construction. " Words in a statute," says Mr. Justice Paterson, ir. the US vs. Heth, 3 Cranch 4 13," ought not to have a retrospective operation, unless...them; or unless the intention of the legislature, cannot be otherwise satisfied. This rule " he adds" ought especially to be adliered to, when such a... | |
 | Nathan Dane - 1824 - 768 sider
...^tate constitutions. Our legislatures cannot dec'are wnat tne law is, but only what it shall be. The words of a statute ought not to have a retrospective...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. Per Paterson, Justice. ART. 8. Statutes in New York and some other States... | |
 | Nathan Dane - 1824 - 764 sider
...413, u. States of a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation, unless tne y are so c ] eaFj strong, and imperative, that no other meaning can...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satis6ed. Per Paterson, Justice. ART. 8. Statutes in JVeio York and some other... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1878 - 738 sider
...that a necessary implication arises therefrom. FreehoU Mutual IsOan Ass'n v. Brown, 121 2. Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation unless they are so clear, strong and impeiaiive that no other meaning can be annexed to them, or unless the intention of the legislature... | |
 | E. Fitch Smith - 1848 - 1004 sider
...restricted to take effect only with regard to future importations. Mr. Justice Patterson held, words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation,...clear, strong, and imperative, that no other meaning could be annexed to them, or unless the intention of the legislature could not be otherwise satisfied.... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1943 - 672 sider
...operate. In United States v. Heth, 3 Cranch, 399, 413, the general rule was laid down that — Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation,...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. This rule has been followed ever since. See United States v. Burr, 159... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1909 - 692 sider
...will be construed prospectively. In United States v. Heth (3 Cranch, 398,) the Court said: Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. The same rule has been approved many times by the Supreme Court. (Murray... | |
 | Benjamin Robbins Curtis, Alexander James Dallas, William Cranch, United States. Supreme Court, Henry Wheaton, Richard Peters, Benjamin Chew Howard - 1870 - 708 sider
...was late collector of the customs for the district of Petersburgh, in the State of Virginia. Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation,...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. This rule ought especially to be adhered to, when such a construction... | |
 | 1885 - 544 sider
...was the intention of the legislature. In US v. Heth, 3 Cranoh, 413, this court said that "words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation...to them, or unless the intention of the Legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied ;" and such is the settled doctrine of this court. Murray v. Gibson,... | |
| |
