 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1942 - 1188 sider
...premises. The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Powell v. Alabama (287 US 45), said: If, in any' case, civil or criminal, a State or Federal court were arbitrarily to refuse to hear a parly by counsel, employed and appearing for him, it reasonably may not Ы- doubled that such a refusal... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1933 - 788 sider
...intelligence, how much more true is it of the ignorant and illiterate, or those of feeble intellect. If in any case, civil or criminal, a state or federal...him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of a hearing, and, therefore, of due process in the constitutional sense.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1935 - 132 sider
...2, 1935. Hon. Vic DONAHEY, United States Senate, Indian Affairs Committee, Washington, DC DEAR SIB: A year ago, in the city of San Francisco, on July...counsel, employed by and appearing for him, it reasonably ma}' not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of a hearing, and, therefore, of due process... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1935 - 1064 sider
...hearing includes the right to the assistance of counsel (attorneys) of his own choice if requested. If in any case, civil or criminal, a State or Federal...to refuse to hear a party by counsel, employed by aud appearing for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of a... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1935 - 1134 sider
...of law"; and Wherc:is the Supreme Court of the United States has recently decided: "If in any ease, civil or criminal, a State or Federal court were arbitrarily to refuse to hear n party by counsel. ' niployed by and apix'arlng for him, it reasonably may not be doubled that sudi... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1935 - 1050 sider
...right to the assistance of (attorneys) of his own choice if requested. If in any ca»e, civil or crimLi a State or Federal court were arbitrarily to refuse to hear a party by CUULSemployed by and appearing for him, it reasonably may not be doubted tti: such a refusal would... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Indian affairs - 1937 - 390 sider
...defendant in the case. This contention has the backing of the Supreme Court of the United States. It says: "If, in any case, civil or criminal, a State or Federal...for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such refusal would be a denial of a hearing and, therefore of due process in a constitutional sense" (Poicell... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1937 - 252 sider
...in the case. This contention has the backing of the Supreme Court of the United States. It says : " 'If, in any case, civil or criminal, a State or Federal...for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such refusal would be a denial of a hearing and, therefore of due process in a constitutional sense' (Powell... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1937 - 240 sider
...in the case. This contention has the backing of the Supreme Court of the United States. It says : " 'If, in any case, civil or criminal, a State or Federal...for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such refusal would be a denial of a hearing and, therefore of due process in a constitutional sense' (Poioell... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Indian Affairs - 1937 - 1272 sider
...(287 US 45), said: "If, in any case, civil or criminal, a Stnte or Federal court were arbitrarily 1o refuse to hear a party by counsel, employed by and appearing for him, if reasonably may not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of hearing, and therefore, of... | |
| |
If in any case, civil or criminal, a state or federal court were arbitrarily to refuse to hear a party by counsel, employed by and appearing for him, it reasonably may not be doubted that such a refusal would be a denial of a hearing, and, therefore,... 
