285 U.S. Decisions Denying Certiorari. No. 763. MISSOURI EX REL. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE R. Co. v. OSSING ET AL. April 11, 1932. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied. Messrs. Harold R. Small and Ashby M. Warren for petitioner. Mr. Chilton Atkinson for respondents. No. 764. ILLICK ET AL. V. TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA ET AL. April 11, 1932. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Messrs. Henry K. Gibson and Henry W. Anderson for petitioners. Messrs. Mitchell D. Price, Robert S. Florence, D. H. Redfearn, Cary D. Landis, and H. P. Adair for respondents. Reported below: 54 F. (2d) 286. No. 768. MAHONIN. COAL R. Co. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES; No. 769. MAHONING COAL R. Co. v. SAME; No. 770. SAME v. ROUTZAHN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE; and No. 771. SAME v. UNITED STATES. April 11, 1932. Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Messrs. Charles C. Paulding and William Mann for petitioners. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, and Andrew D. Sharpe for respondents. Reported below: 51 F. (2d) 208. See also 54 F. (2d) 922. No. 772. COLLETTI v. UNITED STATES. April 11, 1932. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. E. O. Ricketts for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Harry S. Ridgely, and W. Marvin Smith for the United States. Reported below: 53 F. (2d) 1017. Decisions Denying Certiorari. 285 U.S. No. 793. KINGSTON V. AMERICAN CAR & FOUNDRY Co. No. 744. JOHN WANAMAKER NEW YORK, INC., v. COM- INDEX ACTIONS. Form. Suit by owner of tow against tug for damage caused by ADEQUATE REMEDY. See Injunction. ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES. See Taxation, III. ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS. See Statutes, 1-2. Findings of Fact. How far may administrative findings in ADMIRALTY. See Constitutional Law, III, 1-2; VIII; Jurisdic- As to necessity of jury trial in admiralty, see Crowell v. Ben- 1. Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction. Extent of. Crowell v. 2. Towage. Negligence. Liability of tug for injury to tow; 3. Suits Between Foreigners. Jurisdiction. District Court did 4. Limiting Liability. Maritime Tort. Company operating ves- 137818-32-36 561 ADVERTISING. See Constitutional Law, IV, 3; IX, (B), 4. AFFILIATED COMPANIES. See Constitutional Law, IV, 2; Pub- AGENCY. See Carriers. Imputing Knowledge to Principal. Knowledge of factory mana- ALIENS. See Admiralty, 3. AMENDMENTS. See Constitutional Law. ANTI-CIGARETTE LAWS. See Constitutional Law, IV, 3; IX, APPEAL. See Judgments; Jurisdiction, I, 1-3; II, 2; III; IV, 3.. ARREST. See Constitutional Law, VI, 3. ASSESSMENTS. See Banks and Banking, 1. ATTORNEYS AT LAW. See Contempt, 2; Lis Pendens; Proc- ARMY. See Public Lands. ASSIGNMENTS. See Partnership. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR. See Jurisdiction, III. AVIATION. As to state tax on gasoline used by air transport company in BAILMENT. Towage contract as bailment, see Stevens v. The White City, 195. 1. Examination. Court without power to issue writ of ne exeat 2. Summary Jurisdiction.. Petition for reclamation does not sub- BANKS AND BANKING. 1. Assessments on Stockholders. Validity and enforcement. 2. Payment of Forged Checks. Release of right to recoup from BILLBOARDS. See Constitutional Law, IV, 3; IX, (A), 6; IX, BILL OF EXCEPTIONS. See Jury, 2. BILLS OF LADING. See Carriers. BOARD OF TAX APPEALS. See Jurisdiction, I, 3. BONDS. See Constitutional Law, I, 8; V, 1. BURDEN OF PROOF. See Admiralty, 2; Contitutional Law, I, "BUSINESS AFFECTED WITH PUBLIC INTEREST." See CALIFORNIA. See Constitutional Law, V, 1-2; IX, (A), 3-4. CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION. See Public Lands. CAPITAL STOCK TAX. See Taxation, IV, 1–2. CARRIERS. See Negligence; Public Lands. 1. Connecting Carriers. Liability for Loss. Evidence of deliv- 2. Liability Under State Workmen's Compensation Acts. See CENSUS. See Elections. CHARTER. See Corporations, 3. CHECKS. See Banks and Banking, 1. CIGARETTES. See Packer Corporation v. Utah, 106. |