Page Silvia, The, 15 C. C. A. 362, 68 Fed. 230; Simonson, In re (D. C.) 92 Fed. 911.... S. L. Watson, The, 55 C. C. A. 439, 118 Smith v. Exchange, 91 Wis. 360, 368, 64 Smith v. Holcomb, 99 Mass. 552. 490 256 156 37 Southern Pac. v. Rauh, 1 C. C. A. 416, 49 Fed. 696. 45 360 847 603 Southern R. R. v. Allison, 190 U. S. 326, 23 Sup. Ct. 713, 47 L. Ed. Spraigue v. Thompson. 118 U. S. 90, 6 Sup. Ct. 988, 30 L. Ed. 115... Spring Valley Waterworks v. Bartlett (C. C.) 16 Fed. 615, 8 Sawy. 555. Spring Valley Waterworks v. San Francisco, 82 Cal. 286, 22 Pac. 910, 6 L. R. A. 756, 16 Am. St. Rep. 116...587, 590, 603 Spring Valley Waterworks v. Schottler, 110 U. S. 347, 4 Sup. Ct. 48, 28 L. Ed. 173 .586, 600 Stanbrough v. Cook, 83 Iowa, 705, 49 N. W. 1010 715 204 936 245 Star Brass Works v. Electric Co., 49 C. C. State v. Ass'n, 62 Wis. 174, 22 N. W. 135; 225 262 State v. Caldwell, 124 Mo. 513, 28 S. W. 4 336 State v. Racine, 22 Wis. 258, 260.. 127 State v. White, 40 Fla. 318, 24 South. 160 936 | 4, 9, 192 423 Standley v. Roberts, 8 C. C. A. 305, 308, 59 Fed. 836, 839 Stanton v. Embrey, 93 U. S. 548, 23 L. Ed. 983 Stanton v. Wilkeson, 8 Ben. 357, Fed. Cas. No. 13,299 18 423 567 943 939 873 843 156 173 144 803 359 173 Stilwell-Bierce & Smith-Vaile Co. v. Oil 1011 764 Stone v. Farmers' Co., 116 U. S. 307... 358 Stowell v. Fowler, 59 Ń. H. 585. 806 Stranger, The, 1 Asp. M. L. C. 19; 1 367 484 Stirrat v. Mfg. Co., 10 C. C. A. 216, 61 Fed. 980 Stucky v. Bank, 108 U. S. 74, 2 Sup. 993 846 Stumore v. Breen, 12 App. Cas. 698. 647 Sullivan Timber Co. v. Mobile (C. C.) 110 Fed. 186, 197. .647, 649 Summers v. Abbott, 122 Fed. 36.... 760 Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Moore, 183 U. S. 642, 654, 22 Sup. Ct. 240, 46 L. Ed. 366. Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498, 24 L. Ed. 260... Supervisors v. U. S., 4 Wall. 435, 446, 18 L. Ed. 419; 18 Wall. 71, 77, 21 L. Ed. 771 126, 128 Suydam v. Banking Co., 6 Hill. 217. 265 Swain v. Seamers, 9 Wall. 254, 19 L. Ed. 554 649 Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. Frank, 148 U. 169 187 Sweeney v. U. S.. 109 U. S. 618, 3 Sup. 273 Sykes, In re (D. C.) 106 Fed. 669.....405, 421 Swarts v. Siegel, 54 C. C. A. 399, 402, 117 Fed. 13, 16. 51 174 T. A. Goddard, The (D. C.) 12 Fed. 174.. 86 Tarlton v. McGawley, Peake's Nisi Prius Report, p. 270 310 Taylor v. Carryl, 20 How. 586, 15 L. Ed. 1028 .351, 353 Taylor v. Holmes (C. C.) 14 Fed. 507.... 931 .. 732, 921 993 205 Thompson v. Allen Co., 115 U. S. 550, 6 94 Thompson v. Railroad Co., 170 Mass. 577, 49 N. E. 913, 40 L. R. A. 345, 64 Am. St. Rep. 323. Thompson v. The Republic, 23 Wall. 20, 23 L. Ed. 55. Thompson v. Smith, 1 Dill. 458, Fed. Cas. No. 13,977 Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457, 21 L. Ed. 897.. Page 935 62 892 66 341 180 939 174 Thompson v. Young, 2 Ohio, 334. 41 C. C. A. 247, 101 Fed. 121......501, 509 Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Railroad Tourville v. Railroad, 148 Mo. 614, 50 S. 802 77 35 Co., 69 Fed. 257; 18 C. C. A. 145, 71 Fed. 396; 27 C. C. A. 419, 82 Fed. 461, 468; 30 C. C. A. 313, 86 Fed. 636. 15 501, 509, 510, 513 Thornton v. Society (Me.) 53 Atl. 979.... Tilghman v. Proctor, 125 U. S. 136, 8 Sup. Ct. 894, 31 L. Ed. 664. E. 399, 11 Am. St. Rep. 655.. Townsend v. Smith, 47 Wis. 623, 3 N. W. 439, 32 Am. Rep. 793 Tracy v. Holcombe, 24 How. 426, 16 L. Ed. 742 Traer v. Clews, 115 U. S. 528, Sup. Ct. 155, 29 L. Ed. 467.. 14 710 62 339 879 Tilghman v. Werk (C. C.) 39 Fed. 680. 315, 319 9 L. Ed. 1093. Trave, The (D. C.) 55 Fed. 117. Trewatha v. Milling Co., 96 Cal. 494, 500, 28 Pac. 571, 31 Pac. 561.. Tripp v. Cook, 26 Wend. 143, 149.. 723 24 54 671 421 316 335 370 121 266 205 567 991 121 140 Umbria, The, 166 U. S. 404, 17 Sup. Ct. 610, 41 L. Ed. 1053.. 990 Underwood v. Gerber, 149 U. S. 224, 13 512 Union P. R. Co. v. Callaghan, 6 C. C. 71 U. S. v. Altman, 46 C. C. A. 116, 107 Fed. 15 998 336 693 U. S. v. Benjamin (C. C.) 72 Fed. 51... 107 U. S. v. Benzon, 2 Cliff. 512, Fed. Cas. No. 14.577 621 172 835 732 127 U. S. v. Brooklyn (C. C.) 8 Fed. 473. 398 U. S. v. Clark Co., 95 U. S. 769, 24 L. Ed. 545; 96 U. S. 211, 24 L. Ed. 628.. 128 U. S. v. Coal Co., 137 U. S. 160, 11 Sup. 399 U. S. v. Cook, 17 Wall. 168, 21 L. Ed. 538 486 U. S. v. Craig (C. C.) 28 Fed. 799.. 40 U. S. v. D'Auterive, 10 How. 609-623, 13 692 106 131 175 273 66 U. S. v. Goodsell Co., 28 C. C. A. 453, 84 620 U. S. v. Griffith, 141 U. S. 212, 11 Sup. Ct. 1005, 35 L. Ed. 719.... 965 ... U. S. v. Lumber Co., 29 C. Fed. 827 C. A. 431, 85 U. S. v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 691, 8 L. Ed. 547 U. S. v. Blackfeather, 155 U. S. 180, 186, 15 Sup. Ct. 64, 39 L. Ed. 114. U. S. v. Bonner, 1 Bald, 234, Fed. Cas. No. 14,568 U. S. v. Brig Malik Adhel, 2 How. 209, 237, 11 L. Ed. 239. U. S. v. Express Co., 41 C. C. A. 240, 101 Fed. 111 U. S. v. Ft. Scott, 99 U. S. 152, 159, 161, 25 L. Ed. 348.. U. S. v. Gaussen, 19 Wall. 198, 213, 22 L. Ed. 41 U. S. v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588, 602, 20 Sup. Ct. 228, 233, 44 L. Ed. 284. U. S. v. Goodrich, 4 C. C. A. 160, 161, 54 Fed. 21, 22. Page 39 78 U. S. v. Insley, 4 C. C. A. 296, 54 Fed. 223 337 U. S. v. Iselin, 36 C. C. A. 681, 95 Fed. 1007 689 U. S. v. Knox, 102 U. S. 422, 26 L. Ed. 216 242 732, 923 987 643 U. S. v. Lehn, 124 Fed. 87.. 89 U. S. v. Liddle, 2 Wash. C. C. 205, Fed. 835 U. S. v. Lyman, 1 Mason, 499, Fed. Cas. 681 U. S. v. McGlashen (C. C.) 66 Fed. 537 336 128 U. S. v. Merck, 13 C. C. A. 432, 66 Fed. 476 Mills, 13 C. C. A. 692. 297 U. S. v. Moore, 95 U. S. 763, 24 L. 588 U. S. v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 385, 18 L. Ed. 830 U. S. v. Heth, 3 Cranch, 398, 413, 2 L. Ed. 479 U. S. v. Kurtz, 164 U. S. 49, 53, 17 Sup. Ct. 15, 41 L. Ed. 346... U. S. v. Land Co., 148 U. S. 31, 39, 13 Sup. Ct. 458, 37 L. Ed. 354. U. S. v. Laws, 163 U. S. 259, 16 Sup. Ct. 998, 41 L. Ed. 151... Ed. 393, Ed. U. S. v. Ortega, 4 Wash. C. C. 531, Fed. Cas. No. 15,971. C. S. v. 25 L. New Orleans, 98 U. S. 381, Ed. 225. U. S. v. Norton, 97 U. S. 164, 24 L. 907 U. S. v. Payne, 147 U. S. 687, 690, 13 Sup. Ct. 442, 37 L. Ed. 332. U. S. v. Perry, 146 U. S. 71, 13 Sup. Ct. 26, 36 L. Ed. 890. U. S. v. Railroad Co.: (D. C.) 31 Fed. 886, 889. 52 C. C. A. 354, 357, 114 Fed. 722, 725 160 18 How. 241-243, 15 L. Ed. 347. 965 18 162 692 .299, 463 U. S. v. Rio Grande Co., 184 U. S. 423, 22 Sup. Ct. 428, 46 L. Ed. 619.. 967 U. S. v. Road Co., 140 U. S. 599, 616, 11 Sup. Ct. 988, 35 L. Ed. 560.. .142, 988 C. S. v. Salambier, 170 U. S. 621, 18 Sup. 1007 U. S. v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & U. S. v. Stone, 106 U. S. 525, 535, 27 L. U. S. v. Telephone Co. (C. C.) 29 Fed. 17 263 681 U. S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61, 25 341 U. S. v. Trading Co., 18 C. C. A. 335, 71 Fed. 864 .464, 476 150 U. S. 1, 12, 14 Sup. Ct. 11, 37 L. Ed. 975 U. S. v. Reynes, 9 How. 127-148, 13 L. Ed. 74 630 128 689 835 333 299 160 U. S. v. Richard, 39 C. C. A. 504, 99 Fed. 262, 268 689 222 535 Page 336 U. S. v. Vowell, 5 Cranch, 368, 3 L. Ed. 128 .679-681, 685, 686 U. S. v. Wetherell, 13 C. C. A. 264, 65 Fed. 987 60 U. S. v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76, 5 L. Ed. 37 40 107 U. S. v. Zuricaldy (C. C.) 71 Fed. 955. 228 703 Uphoff v. Railroad (C. C.) 5 Fed. 545, 550 368 731 Utt, In re, 5 Am. Bankr. R. 387, 45 C. 704 U. S. v. Van Fossen, 1 Dill. 406, Fed. Cas. No. 16,607 Vaccaro v. Bank, 43 C. C. A. 279, 103 .... Van Gunden v. Iron Co., 3 C. C. A. 294, 52 Fed. 838.. 77 843 66 715 Van Wagener v. Royce, 21 N. Y. Supp. 191 860 390 Varick Bank of New York, In re (D. C.) 119 Fed. 991 77 Velocity, The, L. R. Privy Council Appeals, vol. 3, p. 44.. 851 Vicksburg & M. R. R. v. Putnam, 118 U. .1019 Vigel v. Naylor, 24 How. 208, 16 L. Ed. 646 .833, 834 939 601 Vivid, The, 42 L. J. 57, 28 L. T. 375, 1 Asp. M. 601 .863, 864 863 Vannevar v. Bryant, 21 Wall. 41, 22 L. Ed. 476 Viola, The (D. C.) 90 Fed. 750. Virginia & Truckee R. Co. v. Henry, 8 Nev. 170 Volcano, The, 2 W. Rob. 337. 46 250 ... 833 Wabash R. Co. v. Hannahan (C. C.) 121 434 804 Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654, 664, 17 Sup. Ct. 453, 457, 41 L. Ed. 865. 434 Walker v. Collins, 8 C. C. A. 1, 59 Fed. 70 401 Wall v. Cox, 41 C. C. A. 408, 101 Fed. 403 993 Wallace, The (D. C.) 41 Fed. 894.. 883 Walter Baker Co. v. Baker (C. C.) 77 Fed. 181 614 611 846 Walter Baker & Co. v. Sanders, 26 C. C. A. Page 452 800 355 Watson v. Mercer, 8 Pet. 110, 8 L. Ed. 876 623 82 Watts, In re, 23 Sup. Ct. 718, 47 L. Ed. 352 Warner, The J. F. (D. C.) 22 Fed. 342. Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. 674, 20 L. Ed. Wilks v. Walker, 22 S. C. 180, 53 Am. Willard v. Wood, 135 U. S. 309, 10 Sup. William Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Simpson, 54 Williams, In re, 123 Fed. 321.. 356 241 802 690 333 1014 758, 759 368 974 621 Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 30, 6 L. ... 41 Webb, The, 14 Wall. 406, 20 L. Ed. 774.. 17,407 Wertheimer v. U. S., 5 C. C. A. 107, 55 Fed. 281; 65 Fed. 186... West Co. v. Lea, 174 U. S. 590, 595, 19 Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 116 Fed. 641.. West Mahanoy Tp. v. Watson, 112 Pa. 574, 3 Atl. 866... West Massachusetts Fire Ins. Co. v. Stor- Wharton v. Stoutenburgh, 46 N. J. Law, 151 White, In re, 5 C. C. A. 29, 55 Fed. 54. 237 122 264 199 316 484 694 490 White v. Floyd, Speer, Eq. 351, 355. 143 21 N. W. 524, 50 Am. Rep. 154. 569 U. S. 396, 413, 416, 12 Sup. Ct. 188, 35 967 256 Wilson v. Township, 151 U. S. 64, 14 Sup. Winn v. Railroad (C. C.) 118 Fed. 55. Page 169 566 613 613 406 94 353 Wolf Creek Coal Co. v. Schultz, 71 Pa. 180 317 392 Wood v. Maun, 1 Sumn. 506, 578, Fed. 456 Woods v. Morrell, 1 Johns. Ch. 103. 613 Work v. Leathers, 97 U. S. 379, 24 L. Ed. 52 Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 450, 451, Wetton v. U. S. (C. C.) 84 Fed. 954; G. A. 71 970 Zimmerman v. So Relle, 25 C. C. A. 518, Zinn v. Baxter, 65 Ohio St. 341, 62 N. 250 298 142 242 560 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND THE CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS. THE GERMANIC. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 1, 1903.) Nos. 151, 152. 1. SHIPPING-INJURY TO CARGO-HARTER ACT The trend of judicial decision in the United States has been to construe the Harter act strictly, and not to extend the carrier's exemption from liability to doubtful and uncertain cases, but to leave such liability as it was defined and enforced by the law maritime and by the common law, unless the act plainly and unequivocally asserts a different liability. 2 SAME-SINKING OF VESSEL AT DOCK-NEGLIGENT UNLOADING. The unloading of cargo in the port of discharge by stevedores has no relation to the "management of the vessel," within the meaning of the third section of the Harter act (Act Feb. 13, 1893, c. 105, 27 Stat. 445 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2946]), not being an act done with any view to such management, but relates to the "care or delivery of cargo," within the meaning of the first section; and where by the negligent and improper manner in which it was done it brought about a condition of instability in a ship, which, owing to a large accumulation of ice above her upper deck, rendered her top-heavy, and she rolled over and sank at her dock, injuring the remaining cargo, she is liable for the damage, although other acts done or omitted in the management of the vessel may have contributed to the injury. Wallace, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. For opinion below, see 107 Fed. 294. On appeal from a decree of the District Court of the Southern District of New York finding the Germanic in fault and awarding damages to libelants for loss of cargo due to the stranding of the steamer while lying at pier 45 North river, during the night of Monday, February 13, 1899. 1. Statutory exemption of shipowners from liability, see note to NordDeutscher Lloyd v. Insurance Co. of North America, 49 C. C. A. 11. 124 F.-1 |