Nominations of William H. Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr: Hearings Before the ..., 92-1, November 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10, 19711971 - 492 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 4
... question of the political desirability of so conservative an addition to the court . A very small number suggests that his reiterated conservative views manifest a defect going to his professional qualifications . One of this group said ...
... question of the political desirability of so conservative an addition to the court . A very small number suggests that his reiterated conservative views manifest a defect going to his professional qualifications . One of this group said ...
Side 24
... question relates to the theme we have heard that if a person reads the Constitution , and his judgment as to what it means reflects his personal philosophy , there is something wrong with that . I cannot buy that suggestion because ...
... question relates to the theme we have heard that if a person reads the Constitution , and his judgment as to what it means reflects his personal philosophy , there is something wrong with that . I cannot buy that suggestion because ...
Side 26
... question . The question is a little less academic now than when you wrote . Have you given it any further thought ? Mr. REHNQUIST . I have given it some further thought , Senator , and I would say that I have no reservation at all about ...
... question . The question is a little less academic now than when you wrote . Have you given it any further thought ? Mr. REHNQUIST . I have given it some further thought , Senator , and I would say that I have no reservation at all about ...
Side 29
... question did not go to whether the decision was right or wrong . I was trying to find out what the nominee ascribed as a motivation for the Justices who wrote that opinion . That was what I was driving at . Mr. REHNQUIST . Did I answer ...
... question did not go to whether the decision was right or wrong . I was trying to find out what the nominee ascribed as a motivation for the Justices who wrote that opinion . That was what I was driving at . Mr. REHNQUIST . Did I answer ...
Side 33
... question , in your mind ? In terms of the action of the Congress ? Mr. REHNQUIST . Let me answer it this way : To me , the question of Congress ' authority to cut off funds under the appropriation power of the first amendment is so ...
... question , in your mind ? In terms of the action of the Congress ? Mr. REHNQUIST . Let me answer it this way : To me , the question of Congress ' authority to cut off funds under the appropriation power of the first amendment is so ...
Innhold
1 | |
11 | |
87 | |
109 | |
123 | |
137 | |
145 | |
179 | |
352 | |
363 | |
373 | |
380 | |
386 | |
396 | |
397 | |
419 | |
201 | |
261 | |
289 | |
305 | |
314 | |
326 | |
332 | |
349 | |
441 | |
442 | |
452 | |
463 | |
470 | |
476 | |
483 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
administration American Bar Association answer appointment Arizona Attorney Bar of Arizona believe BIEMILLER Bill of Rights certainly Chairman citizens civil rights client Commission committee concern Congress conservative Constitution criminal justice decision defendants due process fact fair Federal feel fourth amendment going Government individual issue judge judgment judicial philosophy Judiciary Justice Department law enforcement law school lawyer legal services legislation Lewis F Lewis Powell MCCLELLAN ment Mitchell NAACP national security Negro nomination October 23 opinion organized crime Phoenix police political position Powell's President's problem protect qualified question RAUH record REHNQUIST respect responsibility Richmond School Board Senator BAYH Senator FONG Senator HART Senator HRUSKA Senator KENNEDY Senator MATHIAS Senator MCCLELLAN Senator TUNNEY society speech statement Supreme Court surveillance tion trial trying U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court United views violation Virginia vote Washington William Rehnquist wiretapping
Populære avsnitt
Side 371 - Shall there be a convention to revise the Constitution, and amend the same?"* shall be decided by the electors qualified to vote for members of the...
Side 441 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Side 420 - ... jury service unless she herself determines that such service is consistent with her own special responsibilities.
Side 127 - In considering this question, then, we must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.
Side 147 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 248 - Nothing contained in this chapter or in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1143; 47 USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against...
Side 237 - While the admissions or confessions of the prisoner, when voluntarily and freely made, have always ranked high in the scale of incriminating evidence...
Side 249 - Nor shall anything contained in this chapter be deemed to limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the United States against the overthrow of the Government by force or other unlawful means, or against any other clear and present danger to the structure or existence of the Government.
Side 345 - There was a pretty general concensus that more interviews with these subjects and hangers-on are in order for plenty of reasons, chief of which are it will enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles and will further serve to get the point across there is an FBI Agent behind every mailbox.
Side 268 - One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St Augustine that 'an unjust law is no law at all'.