...the public." Likewise, in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773, 792 (1975), the Court stated: "The interest of the States in regulating lawyers...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have historically been 'officers of the courts."' See also In...

...competition usual in the business world may be demoralizing to the ethical standards of a profession.' . . . The interest of the states in regulating lawyers is...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have been 'officers of the courts.' In holding that certain...

...exemption for the program was not essential to the State's regulation of electric utilities. In contrast, the regulation of the activities of the bar is at...especially great since lawyers are essential to the 13 MR. JUSTICE STEVENS, in a portion of his opinion in Cantor that was joined by BRENNAN, WHITE, and...

...The States enjoy broad power to regulate "the practice of professions within their boundaries," and "[t]he interest of the States in regulating lawyers...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have historically been 'officers of the courts.' " Goldfarb...

...in 1943, _lp Parker v. Brown.— In so holding, the Court was careful to point out that regulation of the bar .is "at the core of the State's power to protect the public." Moreover, the Court recognized that the State Bar of Arizona was an Integral arm of the Supreme Court...

...Indeed, in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 US 350, 362 (1977), the Court said: "(T)he regulation of activities of the bar is at the core of the State's...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have historically been "officers of the courts."' " This principle...

...Indeed, in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 US 350, 362 (1977), the Court said: “(T)he regulation of activities of the bar is at the core of the State's...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have historically been “officers of the courts.” This principle...

...interest in regulating the state bar. As we stated in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773 (1975), "[t]he interest of the States in regulating lawyers...lawyers are essential to the primary governmental function of administering justice, and have historically been 'officers of the courts.'" Id., at 792....

...Indeed, in Bates v^ §tate_Bar_of_Arizona, 433 US 350, 362 (1977), the Court said: (T)he regulation of activities of the bar is at the core of the State's...Court in Goldfarb acknowledged that "(t)he interest of tKe states in regulating lawyers is especially great since lawyers are essential to the primary governmental...

...Indeed, in Bates_v i _State_Bar_of_Arizona, 433 US 350, 362 (1977), the Court said: (T)he regulation of activities of the bar is at the core of the State's...Court in Goldfarb acknowledged that "(t)he interest 51 the states in regulating lawyers is especially great since lawyers are essential to the primary...