 It may be said in a general way that the police power extends to all the great public needs. ... It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by usage, or held by the prevailing morality or strong and preponderant opinion to be greatly and immediately...  Reports of Cases Heard and Determined by the Supreme Court of South Carolina - Side 114av South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1912 - 644 sider
...the police power extends to all the great public needs. (Carnfield v. United States, 167 US, 518.) It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by...and immediately necessary to the public welfare." We think it clear that the objects and purposes as above set forth, which the legislature contemplated... | |
 | 1921 - 510 sider
...police power extends to all the great public needs, and it may be put forth in aid of what is held by prevailing morality or strong and preponderant opinion...and immediately necessary to the public welfare." Also in Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Goldsboro, 232 US 548, 34 Sup. Ct. 364, 58 L. ed. 721, in which... | |
 | Tennessee Bar Association - 1913 - 282 sider
...that the police power extends to all the great public needs. Camfield v. United States, 167 US, 518. It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by...opinion to be greatly and immediately necessary to public welfare. ' ' 219 US, 110. In the same case, where the Oklahoma Bank Guarantee bill was before... | |
 | Tennessee Bar Association - 1914 - 1764 sider
...legislature in those cases wihere the Court of last resort finds from the facts that the legislative act ' ' is sanctioned by usage, or held by the prevailing...greatly and immediately necessary to the public welfare, ' ' as said ,by Mr. Justice Holmes in the bank guaranty case. Just when a proposed amendment, according... | |
 | 1922 - 1184 sider
...circumstances it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the subject appeared to be one 'held by the strong and preponderant opinion to be greatly and...the public welfare.' (Noble State Bank v. Haskell, supra [219 US 104J), (208 P.) and that, whether wisely or not, the Legislature, in enacting the law... | |
 | 1912 - 788 sider
...the Oklahoma bank case said (arguendo) : " The police power extends to all the great public needs. It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by...and immediately necessary to the public welfare." Therefore, whenever the people shall have approved an act after it is held unconstitutional, it is... | |
 | 1916 - 948 sider
...applicable." 1 "It may be said in a general way that the police power extends to all the great public needs. It may be put forth in aid of what is sanctioned by...and immediately necessary to the public welfare." Justice Holmes in Noble T. Haskell, 219 US 104, in. "It may be said to be the right of the State to... | |
 | 1917 - 1258 sider
...that the police power extends to all the great public needs. Camtteld v. United States, 167 US 518, 17 Sup. Ct. 864, 42 L. Ed. 260. It may be put forth In...greatly and immediately necessary to the public welfare. Among matters of that sort probably few would doubt that both usage and preponderant opinion give their... | |
 | Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - 1917 - 912 sider
...the police power extends to all the great public needs. Cornfield v. United States, 167 US 518, 17 Sup. Ct. 864, 42 L. Ed. 260. It may be put forth in...greatly and immediately necessary to the public welfare. Among matters of that sort probably few State ex rel. West, Att'y Gen., v. Farmers' Xat. Bank of Gushing.... | |
 | 1915 - 726 sider
...Constitution otherwise would seem clear, if the power is put forth, in the language of Mr. Justice Holmes,§ "in aid of what is sanctioned by usage, or held by...and immediately necessary to the public welfare." The question in each case where an interference with the right of contract is sought to be justified... | |
| |
