... any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines such property may pass, and no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt such common carrier, railroad, or transportation... The Pacific Reporter - Side 3661914Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
| Kentucky - 1916 - 804 sider
...the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property, caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad or transportation company...transportation company from the liability hereby imposed ; and such contract shall be construed to be as between the shipper and the carrier to whom the goods... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 sider
...declared value, made to adjust the rate, is not forbidden by the provisions of the Carmack amendment that "no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt...transportation company, from the liability hereby imposed." 2. What we have already said disposes of all the questions raised upon the motion for a new trial,... | |
| New York (State). Board of Railroad Commissioners - 1907 - 796 sider
...thereof for any loss, damage, or injury tocontfrar7°tract to such property caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company...imposed: Provided, That nothing in this section shall de-~ der^^t'ing law prive any holder of such receipt or bill of lading of any n remedy or right of... | |
| 1907 - 404 sider
...lawful holder tbereflM any loss, damage or injury to such property caused by it or by any common car» railroad or transportation company to which such property may be delivered or of whose line or lines such property may pass, and no contract, receipt, rule or regfll tion shall... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1911 - 710 sider
...any loss, damage or injury to such property caused by its negligence or the negligence of any other common carrier, railroad or transportation company...such property may be delivered or over whose line such property may pass," and held the initial railroad company liable for damages to a shipper of cattle... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1914 - 720 sider
...the holder of the bill of lading for loss or injury to such property caused by it or by any carrier to which such property may be delivered or over whose line or lines it may pass. 2. SAME — when initial carrier is conclusively treated as having made a through contract.... | |
| South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916 - 644 sider
...thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it or by any common carrier, * * * to which such property may be delivered or over whose...rule, or regulation shall exempt such common carrier * * * from the liability hereby imposed." There was another amendment to the interstate commerce act,... | |
| 1917 - 498 sider
...to the lawful holder thereof for any loss, damage, or injury to such property caused by it or by any common carrier, railroad, or transportation company...or over whose line or lines such property may pass within the United States or within an adjacent foreign country when transported on a through bill of... | |
| 1916 - 502 sider
...Carmack Amendment. What is meant by the language "caused by" taken in connection with the provision that "no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt...transportation company from the liability hereby imposed?" In Adams Express Co. v. Croninger,1 the Supreme Court declared : "What is the liability imposed upon... | |
| 1920 - 496 sider
...requiring that a receipt or bill of lading be issued, immediately after that recital provides that "no contract, receipt, rule, or regulation shall exempt...railroad or transportation company from the liability here imposed." This seems to indicate that congress had in mind the contracts, rules and regulations... | |
| |