Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session on H.R. 2447 ... October 20, November 3, 1983, and February 9, 1984U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 281 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 21
Side
... Michigan E. CLAY SHAW , JR . , Florida F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER , JR . Wisconsin HAYDEN W. GREGORY , Counsel ERIC E. STERLING , Assistant Counsel CHARLENE VANLIER , Associate Counsel October 20 , 1983 . November 3 , 1983 . JACK BROOKS ...
... Michigan E. CLAY SHAW , JR . , Florida F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER , JR . Wisconsin HAYDEN W. GREGORY , Counsel ERIC E. STERLING , Assistant Counsel CHARLENE VANLIER , Associate Counsel October 20 , 1983 . November 3 , 1983 . JACK BROOKS ...
Side 24
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . I have no questions . Mr. HUGHES . The gentleman from Florida , Mr. Smith . Mr. SMITH . Thank you , Mr. Chairman . You made the point that there is a lack of remedies . I can under- stand the references to the ...
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . I have no questions . Mr. HUGHES . The gentleman from Florida , Mr. Smith . Mr. SMITH . Thank you , Mr. Chairman . You made the point that there is a lack of remedies . I can under- stand the references to the ...
Side 29
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . I might just say along the general line of your com- menting that in the 97th Congress , in another subcommittee , which I am a member , and was then , we adopted the so - called Piracy and Counterfeiting Act ...
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . I might just say along the general line of your com- menting that in the 97th Congress , in another subcommittee , which I am a member , and was then , we adopted the so - called Piracy and Counterfeiting Act ...
Side 46
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . Yes , this is one of the areas that I indicate kind of bothered me . I am not bothered particularly by what I would con- sider the outright counterfeit where somebody goes into the busi- ness to make something ...
... Michigan . Mr. SAWYER . Yes , this is one of the areas that I indicate kind of bothered me . I am not bothered particularly by what I would con- sider the outright counterfeit where somebody goes into the busi- ness to make something ...
Side 48
... Michigan , and they have altered it , but ba- sically a commencing a procedure with a writ of seizure or im- poundment or something of that type . So it is not really an unusu- al - but I can see that a retailer - and it may well be ...
... Michigan , and they have altered it , but ba- sically a commencing a procedure with a writ of seizure or im- poundment or something of that type . So it is not really an unusu- al - but I can see that a retailer - and it may well be ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
ABBEY action affirmative defense AGMC amended believe bill BORDA Calvin Klein Chairman civil remedies commercial counterfeiting concern consumer coun counter counterfeit mark counterfeit merchandise counterfeit products counterfeit trademark court criminal penalties criminal sanctions Customs deceive or defraud defendant deterrent ECKES enforcement ex parte orders ex parte seizure Federal feit FINN foreign fraud genuine mark going gray market Gucci HALUZA hearing HUGHES important industry injunction intent to deceive issue Jed Rakoff jurisdiction label Lanham Act legislation legitimate manufacturers MOSSINGHOFF Patent plaintiff principal register problem proposed prosecution protection question RAKOFF requirement retailers Rolex rule 65 SACOFF SAWYER seized seizure order sell Senate SMITH spurious mark statute substantially temporary restraining order terfeit Thank tion trade trade dress Trademark Counterfeiting Act trademark holders trademark infringement trademark owner trafficking in counterfeit treble damages U.S. attorney U.S. Customs Service Umans United violation WALLEN WIDHAM
Populære avsnitt
Side 115 - Section endorses the resolution relating to process patent legislation adopted by the Section of Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law of the American Bar Association at its 1983 Annual Meeting.
Side 124 - gist of the question of standing" is whether the party seeking relief has "alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions.
Side 122 - Act of February 20, 1905, or the Act of March 19, 1920. The phrase "marks registered in the Patent and Trademark Office" means registered marks. The term "Act of March 3, 1881," "Act of February 20, 1905," or "Act of March 19, 1920," means the respective Act as amended. A "counterfeit" is a spurious mark which is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark.
Side 124 - Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186, 204 (1962). In other words, when standing is placed in issue in a case, the question is whether the person whose standing is challenged is a proper party to request an adjudication of a particular issue and not whether the issue itself is justiciable.
Side 2 - FRANK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 18 of the United States Code to strengthen the laws against the counterfeiting of trademarks, and for other purposes.
Side 128 - Particularly is this respect due when the administrative practice at stake "involves a contemporaneous construction of a statute by the men charged with the responsibility of setting its machinery in motion, of making the parts work efficiently and smoothly while they are yet untried and new.
Side 111 - BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME OF THE * HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY...
Side 122 - copying or simulating" mark or name is an actual counterfeit of the recorded mark or name or is one which so resembles It as to be likely to cause the public to associate the copying or simulating mark with the recorded mark or name. (b) Identical trademark.
Side 123 - registered mark" means a mark registered in the United States Patent Office under this Act or under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or the Act of March 19, 1920. The phrase "marks registered in the Patent Office
Side 272 - In assessing profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove defendant's sales only; defendant must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.