Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session on H.R. 2447 ... October 20, November 3, 1983, and February 9, 1984U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985 - 281 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 44
Side 12
... legitimate manufacturers in a wide range of industries as well as their often unsuspecting consumers face a problem that is reaching epidemic proportions . We believe that problem cries out for a legislative solution . WHAT HAS BEEN ...
... legitimate manufacturers in a wide range of industries as well as their often unsuspecting consumers face a problem that is reaching epidemic proportions . We believe that problem cries out for a legislative solution . WHAT HAS BEEN ...
Side 14
... legitimate reasons for having that information in any event . . . So that while I do not disagree with the factual statement , I disagree that the factural statement im- plies the existence of a real problem . ' " " 2. The seizure ...
... legitimate reasons for having that information in any event . . . So that while I do not disagree with the factual statement , I disagree that the factural statement im- plies the existence of a real problem . ' " " 2. The seizure ...
Side 16
... legitimate parts manufacturer in this country who has become vulnerable to lost sales and reputations and the work- ers who become vulnerable to lost jobs . Again , if I might just devi- ate , we equate 20,000 jobs to $ 1 billion in ...
... legitimate parts manufacturer in this country who has become vulnerable to lost sales and reputations and the work- ers who become vulnerable to lost jobs . Again , if I might just devi- ate , we equate 20,000 jobs to $ 1 billion in ...
Side 17
... legitimate company without knowledge that their product is counterfeit . Again , it is the genuine manufacturer who pays the cost in lost reputation and good will when his name is released under suspicion of a defects investigation ...
... legitimate company without knowledge that their product is counterfeit . Again , it is the genuine manufacturer who pays the cost in lost reputation and good will when his name is released under suspicion of a defects investigation ...
Side 18
... legitimate cap and it is identified by a Mylar label , which is about the only way you can distinguish it from the coun- terfeit . We have put it on . It is a locking gas cap , and to function , we have taken the lock out . What you ...
... legitimate cap and it is identified by a Mylar label , which is about the only way you can distinguish it from the coun- terfeit . We have put it on . It is a locking gas cap , and to function , we have taken the lock out . What you ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
ABBEY action affirmative defense AGMC amended believe bill BORDA Calvin Klein Chairman civil remedies commercial counterfeiting concern consumer coun counter counterfeit mark counterfeit merchandise counterfeit products counterfeit trademark court criminal penalties criminal sanctions Customs deceive or defraud defendant deterrent ECKES enforcement ex parte orders ex parte seizure Federal feit FINN foreign fraud genuine mark going gray market Gucci HALUZA hearing HUGHES important industry injunction intent to deceive issue Jed Rakoff jurisdiction label Lanham Act legislation legitimate manufacturers MOSSINGHOFF Patent plaintiff principal register problem proposed prosecution protection question RAKOFF requirement retailers Rolex rule 65 SACOFF SAWYER seized seizure order sell Senate SMITH spurious mark statute substantially temporary restraining order terfeit Thank tion trade trade dress Trademark Counterfeiting Act trademark holders trademark infringement trademark owner trafficking in counterfeit treble damages U.S. attorney U.S. Customs Service Umans United violation WALLEN WIDHAM
Populære avsnitt
Side 115 - Section endorses the resolution relating to process patent legislation adopted by the Section of Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law of the American Bar Association at its 1983 Annual Meeting.
Side 124 - gist of the question of standing" is whether the party seeking relief has "alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions.
Side 122 - Act of February 20, 1905, or the Act of March 19, 1920. The phrase "marks registered in the Patent and Trademark Office" means registered marks. The term "Act of March 3, 1881," "Act of February 20, 1905," or "Act of March 19, 1920," means the respective Act as amended. A "counterfeit" is a spurious mark which is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a registered mark.
Side 124 - Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186, 204 (1962). In other words, when standing is placed in issue in a case, the question is whether the person whose standing is challenged is a proper party to request an adjudication of a particular issue and not whether the issue itself is justiciable.
Side 2 - FRANK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL To amend title 18 of the United States Code to strengthen the laws against the counterfeiting of trademarks, and for other purposes.
Side 128 - Particularly is this respect due when the administrative practice at stake "involves a contemporaneous construction of a statute by the men charged with the responsibility of setting its machinery in motion, of making the parts work efficiently and smoothly while they are yet untried and new.
Side 111 - BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME OF THE * HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY...
Side 122 - copying or simulating" mark or name is an actual counterfeit of the recorded mark or name or is one which so resembles It as to be likely to cause the public to associate the copying or simulating mark with the recorded mark or name. (b) Identical trademark.
Side 123 - registered mark" means a mark registered in the United States Patent Office under this Act or under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, or the Act of March 19, 1920. The phrase "marks registered in the Patent Office
Side 272 - In assessing profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove defendant's sales only; defendant must prove all elements of cost or deduction claimed.