Nominations of William H. Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Nominations of William H. Rehnquist, of Arizona, and Lewis F. Powell, Jr., of Virginia, to be Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971 - 492 sider
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
action activities administration agree amendment answer appointment Arizona Attorney authority believe Bill Board certainly Chairman citizens civil rights Commission committee concern Congress Constitution course crime criminal decision Department effect equal evidence expressed fact fair Federal feel follows give going Government important individual interest involved issue judge judgment judicial Justice law enforcement lawyer legislation letter Lewis limited matter means mind nomination Office opinion organized particular philosophy political position Powell Powell's practice present President problem protect question reason record REHNQUIST respect responsibility Richmond Senator Bayh Senator Hart Senator KENNEDY served situation society specific standards statement suggest Supreme Court surveillance Thank thing thought tion trial trying understand United views Virginia vote Washington wiretapping
Side 359 - The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.
Side 272 - A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.
Side 377 - Shall there be a convention to revise the Constitution, and amend the same?"* shall be decided by the electors qualified to vote for members of the...
Side 261 - We hold only that when the process shifts from investigatory to accusatory — when its focus is on the accused and its purpose is to elicit a confession — our adversary system begins to operate, and, under the circumstances here, the accused must be permitted to consult with his lawyer.
Side 447 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Side 426 - ... jury service unless she herself determines that such service is consistent with her own special responsibilities.
Side 131 - In considering this question, then, we must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.
Side 151 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 158 - The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.