Nominations of William H. Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Nominations of William H. Rehnquist, of Arizona, and Lewis F. Powell, Jr., of Virginia, to be Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United StatesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1971 - 492 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 10
... constitutional cases he will be guided not by his personal philos- ophy but by a commitment to the commands of the Constitution , interpreted in the light of its text and its history . This does not mean that he will be a wooden ...
... constitutional cases he will be guided not by his personal philos- ophy but by a commitment to the commands of the Constitution , interpreted in the light of its text and its history . This does not mean that he will be a wooden ...
Side 11
... Constitution and appreciates the difficult role a court must play as a con- stitutional arbiter in a democratic society . It is my anticipation that Mr. Rehnquist , if he is confirmed , will serve with distinction and that history will ...
... Constitution and appreciates the difficult role a court must play as a con- stitutional arbiter in a democratic society . It is my anticipation that Mr. Rehnquist , if he is confirmed , will serve with distinction and that history will ...
Side 17
... Constitution ? No Senator has a duty to vote to confirm any nomination forwarded by the President that cannot pass muster under this threefold test . In my judgment , this is what this hearing is all about - not about the so - called ...
... Constitution ? No Senator has a duty to vote to confirm any nomination forwarded by the President that cannot pass muster under this threefold test . In my judgment , this is what this hearing is all about - not about the so - called ...
Side 18
... Constitution itself . If we can return fidelity to the Constitution , I believe our society will be both free and safe . Mr. Chairman , with that preface , I would like to ask the nominee before us this morning some questions . The ...
... Constitution itself . If we can return fidelity to the Constitution , I believe our society will be both free and safe . Mr. Chairman , with that preface , I would like to ask the nominee before us this morning some questions . The ...
Side 19
... Constitution and change it to achieve a result that you thought might be desirable for society ? Mr. REHNQUIST . No ; I would not . Senator MCCLELLAN . If you felt honestly and deeply that a settled course of constitutional doctrine ...
... Constitution and change it to achieve a result that you thought might be desirable for society ? Mr. REHNQUIST . No ; I would not . Senator MCCLELLAN . If you felt honestly and deeply that a settled course of constitutional doctrine ...
Innhold
1 | |
11 | |
15 | |
86 | |
109 | |
110 | |
123 | |
133 | |
320 | |
326 | |
332 | |
349 | |
352 | |
363 | |
373 | |
380 | |
137 | |
145 | |
179 | |
201 | |
258 | |
281 | |
287 | |
288 | |
293 | |
299 | |
305 | |
386 | |
396 | |
397 | |
419 | |
441 | |
442 | |
452 | |
463 | |
470 | |
476 | |
483 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
administration American Bar Association answer appointment Arizona Attorney Bar of Arizona believe BIEMILLER Bill of Rights certainly Chairman citizens civil rights client Commission committee concern Congress conservative Constitution criminal justice decision defendants due process fact Federal feel fourth amendment going Government individual issue judge judgment judicial philosophy Judiciary Justice Department law enforcement law school lawyer legal services legislation Lewis F Lewis Powell MCCLELLAN ment Mitchell NAACP national security Negro nomination October 23 opinion organized crime Phoenix police political position Powell's President's problem protect qualified question RAUH reason record REHNQUIST respect responsibility Richmond School Board Senator BAYH Senator FONG Senator HART Senator HRUSKA Senator KENNEDY Senator MATHIAS Senator MCCLELLAN Senator TUNNEY society speech statement Supreme Court surveillance tion trial U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court United views violation Virginia vote Washington William Rehnquist wiretapping
Populære avsnitt
Side 357 - The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.
Side 270 - A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.
Side 375 - Shall there be a convention to revise the Constitution, and amend the same?"* shall be decided by the electors qualified to vote for members of the...
Side 259 - We hold only that when the process shifts from investigatory to accusatory — when its focus is on the accused and its purpose is to elicit a confession — our adversary system begins to operate, and, under the circumstances here, the accused must be permitted to consult with his lawyer.
Side 445 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Side 424 - ... jury service unless she herself determines that such service is consistent with her own special responsibilities.
Side 129 - In considering this question, then, we must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.
Side 149 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 156 - The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.
Side 250 - Nothing contained in this chapter or in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1143; 47 USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against...