Nominations of William H. Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Nominations of William H. Rehnquist, of Arizona, and Lewis F. Powell, Jr., of Virginia, to be Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United StatesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1971 - 492 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 17
... Court overruled involved a change in constitutional doctrine accomplished without invoking the prescribed processes for the adoption of a constitutional amendment . It is significant that 26 of these 29 decisions were 17.
... Court overruled involved a change in constitutional doctrine accomplished without invoking the prescribed processes for the adoption of a constitutional amendment . It is significant that 26 of these 29 decisions were 17.
Side 20
... amendment in order to " keep the Constitution up to date " or to bring it into harmony with the times : it was never meant that this Court have such power , which in effect would make us a continuously functioning constitu- tional ...
... amendment in order to " keep the Constitution up to date " or to bring it into harmony with the times : it was never meant that this Court have such power , which in effect would make us a continuously functioning constitu- tional ...
Side 28
... amendment required you to protect an individual , would your willingness to give them that protection be in any respect modified for fear that some critic might attack your decision as being a result of ideological sympathy for that ...
... amendment required you to protect an individual , would your willingness to give them that protection be in any respect modified for fear that some critic might attack your decision as being a result of ideological sympathy for that ...
Side 30
... amendment , and without reading a catalogue , I suspect there are other limits . Senator HART . What about an Executive that would put Senators under surveillance because he might conclude that their activities in regard to his policies ...
... amendment , and without reading a catalogue , I suspect there are other limits . Senator HART . What about an Executive that would put Senators under surveillance because he might conclude that their activities in regard to his policies ...
Side 31
... amendment rights as vigorously as they would like to because they fear the unknown im- pact on their families , and their careers , of a Government file , investi- gation reports resulting from surveillance of lawful activities ? Is ...
... amendment rights as vigorously as they would like to because they fear the unknown im- pact on their families , and their careers , of a Government file , investi- gation reports resulting from surveillance of lawful activities ? Is ...
Innhold
1 | |
11 | |
15 | |
86 | |
109 | |
110 | |
123 | |
133 | |
320 | |
326 | |
332 | |
349 | |
352 | |
363 | |
373 | |
380 | |
137 | |
145 | |
179 | |
201 | |
258 | |
281 | |
287 | |
288 | |
293 | |
299 | |
305 | |
386 | |
396 | |
397 | |
419 | |
441 | |
442 | |
452 | |
463 | |
470 | |
476 | |
483 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
administration American Bar Association answer appointment Arizona Attorney Bar of Arizona believe BIEMILLER Bill of Rights certainly Chairman citizens civil rights client Commission committee concern Congress conservative Constitution criminal justice decision defendants due process fact Federal feel fourth amendment going Government individual issue judge judgment judicial philosophy Judiciary Justice Department law enforcement law school lawyer legal services legislation Lewis F Lewis Powell MCCLELLAN ment Mitchell NAACP national security Negro nomination October 23 opinion organized crime Phoenix police political position Powell's President's problem protect qualified question RAUH reason record REHNQUIST respect responsibility Richmond School Board Senator BAYH Senator FONG Senator HART Senator HRUSKA Senator KENNEDY Senator MATHIAS Senator MCCLELLAN Senator TUNNEY society speech statement Supreme Court surveillance tion trial U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court United views violation Virginia vote Washington William Rehnquist wiretapping
Populære avsnitt
Side 357 - The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.
Side 270 - A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.
Side 375 - Shall there be a convention to revise the Constitution, and amend the same?"* shall be decided by the electors qualified to vote for members of the...
Side 259 - We hold only that when the process shifts from investigatory to accusatory — when its focus is on the accused and its purpose is to elicit a confession — our adversary system begins to operate, and, under the circumstances here, the accused must be permitted to consult with his lawyer.
Side 445 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Side 424 - ... jury service unless she herself determines that such service is consistent with her own special responsibilities.
Side 129 - In considering this question, then, we must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.
Side 149 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 156 - The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.
Side 250 - Nothing contained in this chapter or in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1143; 47 USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against...