Nominations of William H. Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell, Jr: Hearings, Ninety-second Congress, First Session, on Nominations of William H. Rehnquist, of Arizona, and Lewis F. Powell, Jr., of Virginia, to be Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United StatesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1971 - 492 sider |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 25
... problem of our society to which the broad provisions of the Constitu- tion must be applied . In the past , as one Senator , I have acknowledged hesitancy to oppose a nominee with judicial experience merely because I might disagree with ...
... problem of our society to which the broad provisions of the Constitu- tion must be applied . In the past , as one Senator , I have acknowledged hesitancy to oppose a nominee with judicial experience merely because I might disagree with ...
Side 33
... problem . Senator KENNEDY . You recognize the responsibility of the Congress , certainly with the warmaking powers , and that this is a shared power ? Mr. REHNQUIST . Certainly . Senator KENNEDY . Did you feel that any determination by ...
... problem . Senator KENNEDY . You recognize the responsibility of the Congress , certainly with the warmaking powers , and that this is a shared power ? Mr. REHNQUIST . Certainly . Senator KENNEDY . Did you feel that any determination by ...
Side 34
... problem for me , Senator , because there is clearly a lawyer- client relationship here . And if you are inquiring about any advice I have given to a private client , it would be unthinkable for me to testify to it . Nonetheless , my ...
... problem for me , Senator , because there is clearly a lawyer- client relationship here . And if you are inquiring about any advice I have given to a private client , it would be unthinkable for me to testify to it . Nonetheless , my ...
Side 35
... problem of the client - lawyer relationship in your conversations with Mr. Mitchell . Then you indicated finally that it would not have made much of a difference because you had not been asked anyway about Kent State . Is that right ...
... problem of the client - lawyer relationship in your conversations with Mr. Mitchell . Then you indicated finally that it would not have made much of a difference because you had not been asked anyway about Kent State . Is that right ...
Side 40
... problem with . And I can fully sense the problem you have , and surely you can sense the problem that the nominee has , too . Past nominees have generally confined themselves to fairly general expressions , which I am sure are less than ...
... problem with . And I can fully sense the problem you have , and surely you can sense the problem that the nominee has , too . Past nominees have generally confined themselves to fairly general expressions , which I am sure are less than ...
Innhold
1 | |
12 | |
86 | |
87 | |
110 | |
123 | |
201 | |
258 | |
326 | |
332 | |
349 | |
352 | |
363 | |
373 | |
380 | |
386 | |
281 | |
287 | |
288 | |
293 | |
299 | |
305 | |
320 | |
396 | |
399 | |
419 | |
442 | |
452 | |
470 | |
483 | |
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
administration American Bar Association answer appointment Arizona Attorney believe BIEMILLER Bill of Rights Board of Education certainly Chairman citizens civil disobedience civil rights client Commission committee concern Congress Constitution criminal justice decision defendants due process fact fair Federal feel fourth amendment going Government individual issue judge judicial philosophy Judiciary Justice Department law enforcement Law School lawyer legal services legislation Lewis F Lewis Powell ment Mitchell NAACP national security Negro nominee October 23 opinion organized crime Phoenix police political position Powell's President's privilege problem protect qualified question RAUH record Rehnquist respect responsibility Richmond Sargent Shriver School Board Senator BAYH Senator FONG Senator HART Senator HRUSKA Senator KENNEDY Senator MATHIAS Senator TUNNEY society speech statement Supreme Court surveillance tion trial U.S. Senate U.S. Supreme Court United views violation Virginia vote Washington William Rehnquist wiretapping
Populære avsnitt
Side 357 - The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep.
Side 270 - A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law.
Side 375 - Shall there be a convention to revise the Constitution, and amend the same?"* shall be decided by the electors qualified to vote for members of the...
Side 259 - We hold only that when the process shifts from investigatory to accusatory — when its focus is on the accused and its purpose is to elicit a confession — our adversary system begins to operate, and, under the circumstances here, the accused must be permitted to consult with his lawyer.
Side 445 - Such considerations apply with added force to children in grade and high schools. To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Side 424 - ... jury service unless she herself determines that such service is consistent with her own special responsibilities.
Side 129 - In considering this question, then, we must never forget that it is a constitution we are expounding.
Side 149 - ... no person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person...
Side 156 - The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.
Side 250 - Nothing contained in this chapter or in section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 1143; 47 USC 605) shall limit the constitutional power of the President to take such measures as he deems necessary to protect the Nation against...