...Conlrey, 194 US 329 [24 S. C t. 667, 48 L. Ed. 997]. * * * It is not the fact of punishment but ratlier its character and purpose that often serve to distinguish between the two classes of cases. • • • J}ut imprisonment for civil contempt is ordered where the defendant has refused to do an...

...court the defendant has disobeyed the order, and a prayer that he be attached and punished therefor. It is not the fact of punishment but rather its character...But if it is for criminal contempt the sentence is pun'.tive, to vindicate the authority of the court. It is t ue that punishment by imprisonment may...

...court the defendant has disobeyed the order, and a prayer that he be attached and punished therefor. It is not the fact of punishment, but rather its character...complainant. But if it is for criminal contempt the sentence in punitive, to vindicate the authority of the court. It is true that punishment by imprisonment may...

...court the defendant has disobeyed the order, and a prayer that he be attached and punished therefor. It is not the fact of punishment but rather its character...often serve to distinguish between the two classes 11 f cases. If it is for civil contempt the punishment is remedial, and for the benefit of the complainant....

...disobedience as a public wrong. As was said in Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 US 418, 441: "It is not the fact of punishment but rather its character...to distinguish between the two classes of cases." And again, p. 448: "The classification then depends upon the question as to whether the punishment...

...Buck's Stove & Range Co. 221 U. S. 418, 441, 55 L. ed. 797, 805, 34 LRA (NS) 874, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 492: "It is not the fact of punishment, but rather its...to distinguish between the two classes of cases." And again, p. 448: "The classification, then, depends upon the question as to whether the punishment...

...disobedience as a public wrong. As was said in Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range. Co., 221 US 418, 441: "It is not the fact of punishment but rather its character...to distinguish between the two classes of cases." And again, p. 448: "The classification then depends upon the question as to whether the punishment...

...Appeal, 50 Pa. 285. W. Va. — Ruhl f. Ruhl, 24 W. Va. 297. Punishment as Showing Classification. — "It is not the fact of punishment but rather its character and purpose that often serves to distinguish between the two classes of cases. If it is for civil contempt the punishment...

...the defendant hae disobeyed the order, and a prayer that he be attached and punished therefor. It le not the fact of punishment, but rather its character and purpose, that often serre to distinguish between tbe two classes of cases. If It I» for civil contempt, the punishment...

...disobeyed the order and a prayer that he be attached and punished therefor. It is not the fact of the punishment, but rather its character and purpose that...distinguish between the two classes of cases. If it is civil contempt the punishment is remedial, and for the benefit of the complainant. But if it is for...