United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 368United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1962 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-5 av 100
Side 16
... trial of the issues unless within a reasonable time , no later than January 2 , 1962 , the State of Alabama shall have accorded peti- tioner an opportunity to be heard on its motion to dissolve the state restraining order of June 1 ...
... trial of the issues unless within a reasonable time , no later than January 2 , 1962 , the State of Alabama shall have accorded peti- tioner an opportunity to be heard on its motion to dissolve the state restraining order of June 1 ...
Side 20
... trial court dismissed the libel , holding that , since the vessel was not in navigation , there was no warranty of seaworthiness . The Court of Appeals affirmed . Held : The existence of the warranty of seaworthiness depends on whether ...
... trial court dismissed the libel , holding that , since the vessel was not in navigation , there was no warranty of seaworthiness . The Court of Appeals affirmed . Held : The existence of the warranty of seaworthiness depends on whether ...
Side 21
... trial court found that " admittedly " reactiva- tion of the ship would have required a major overhaul . In 1954 the Government was confronted with an urgent need of storage facilities for the country's surplus grain , and a decision was ...
... trial court found that " admittedly " reactiva- tion of the ship would have required a major overhaul . In 1954 the Government was confronted with an urgent need of storage facilities for the country's surplus grain , and a decision was ...
Side 23
... trial court were clearly erroneous.2 Since we are unwilling to upset the trial court's factual determination that the S. S. Harry Lane was not a vessel 2 For cases involving similar facts and to the same effect see Hawn v . American ...
... trial court were clearly erroneous.2 Since we are unwilling to upset the trial court's factual determination that the S. S. Harry Lane was not a vessel 2 For cases involving similar facts and to the same effect see Hawn v . American ...
Side 37
... trial court , peti- tioner contended that no verdict should be directed against him on the grounds , among others : ( 1 ) that the allegations of fraud set up in the railroad's special plea were not sufficient in law to state a defense ...
... trial court , peti- tioner contended that no verdict should be directed against him on the grounds , among others : ( 1 ) that the allegations of fraud set up in the railroad's special plea were not sufficient in law to state a defense ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
affidavit affiliation Alabama alleged amicus curiae appeal is dismissed appellee application argued the cause Assistant Attorney Assn Attorney General Miller Beatrice Rosenberg C. A. 2d Cir C. A. 5th Cir Certiorari denied Certiorari granted claim Commission Commissioner common carriers Communist Party Cong Congress contract carrier convictions Corp County Court of Appeals Court of California CURIAM deposition dissenting District Court District of Columbia employee eral evidence Florida Fourteenth Amendment HARLAN Illinois issue judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE DOUGLAS Labor Board leave to file Lehman Brothers Louisiana membership Miller and Beatrice Misc motor October 9 Pennsylvania peti petition for writ petitioner petitioner's question record Reported respondent Rule sentence shipper Solicitor General Cox Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court Texas tion tioner tobacco transportation trial U. S. App U.S. October United States Court Virginia WARDEN WCAN William WOKY writ of certiorari York
Populære avsnitt
Side 235 - of the Commission, and no report by the Commission of any investigation of any such accident, shall be admitted as evidence, or used for any other purpose, in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in such report or investigation." 49 USC §320(f). 10 E. g., United States
Side 390 - 11 The penalties under the 1959 amendments are as follows: "Any person who violates any order issued by the commission or board under subsection (b) of this section after such order has become final, and while such order is in effect, shall forfeit and pay to the United States a civil penalty of not more than
Side 363 - (D) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor or its shareholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets are transferred, or (E) a recapitalization, or (F) a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization, however effected.
Side 42 - at all in the history, purpose or language of the Act which provides recovery for any "injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of" the railroad 14 and there is no prior authority of this Court which requires or even permits us to disregard or impair
Side 449 - or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.
Side 363 - in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock, of at least 80 per centum of the . . . stock of another corporation." " (Emphasis added.) This type of reorganization is commonly called a "(B) reorganization." There is no dispute between the parties about the fact that the transaction involved was not a "reorganization,
Side 342 - record. The Board may modify its findings as to the facts, or make new findings by reason of additional evidence so taken and filed, and it shall file such modified or new findings, which findings with respect to questions of fact if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole shall be conclusive, and shall file its
Side 390 - for each violation .... Each separate violation of any such order shall be a separate offense, except that in the case of a violation through continuing failure or neglect to obey a final order of the commission or board each day of continuance of such failure or neglect shall be deemed a separate offense.
Side 235 - That neither said report nor any report of said investigation nor any part thereof shall be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report or investigation.