...concurring). The established rule is that for discovery to come within the purview of the exception it must be "falling in the plain view of an officer who has a right to be in the position to have that view" and that the discovery was "inadvertent". The pursuit was not "hot" and there was ample opportunity...

...under his immediate control. Objects in the "plain view" of an officer who has the right to be in that position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be presented as evidence." (People vs. Figueroa, GR No. 97143, Oct. 2 [1995]. Thus, appellant cannot claim...

...been opened, the registration card, with the name of the robbery victim on it, was plainly visible. It has long been settled that objects falling in the...view are subject to seizure and may be introduced in evidence. Ker v. California, 374 US 23, 42-43 (1963); United States v. Lee, 274 US 559 (1927); Hester...

...the officer lawfully opened the door, the registration card was plainly visible. Objects which fall In the plain view of an officer who has a right to be where he is are subject to seizure and •ay be used as evidence. INIQUE PROBLEMS IN SEARCH AND SEIZURE...

...for it is well published that "objects falling in the •lain view of an officer who has a right to f in the position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be introduced :n evidence. [Citations.]" (Harris v. fnned States, 390 US 234, 236, 88 S.Ct. '•?.'. 993, 19 L.Ed.2djy067.)...

...for it is well published that "objects falling in the :lain view of an officer who has a right to :c in the position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be introduced ;n evidence. [Citations.]" (Harris v. I'nited States, 390 US 234, 236, 88 S.Ct. f)2. 993, 19 L.Ed.2djJ067.)...

...rule of no search. According to the Supreme Court: "It has long been settled that objects falling in plain view of an officer who has a right to be in...view are subject to seizure and may be introduced in evidence." There is no search when the items in question are shown voluntarily to you or if the items...

...States v. Kara, 468 US 705 (1984)). e. Plain View and Vehicles According to the plain view doctrine, "Objects falling in the plain view of an officer who has a right to be in a position to have that view are subject to seizure" (Harris v. United States. 390 US 234 (1968))....

..."Plain-View" Exception In Harris v. United States (1968), the Court issued the following announcement: "It has long been settled that objects falling in...view are subject to seizure and may be introduced into evidence." This plain-view exception was given further elaboration in Coolidge v. New Hampshire...

...the case of People vs. Musa, ™ held that: "Objects in the 'plain view' of an officer who has the right to be in the position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be presented as evidence." "The 'plain view' doctrine may not. however, be used to launch unbridled searches...