...not, to borrow from the opinion of Justice Fortas in Tinker v. Des Moines Community School District,12 "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." 13 While, therefore, the authority of educational institutions over the conduct of students must be...

...of the speclaT~characteristIcs of" the school environment, available to teachers and students. __It can hardly be /argued that either students or teachers...unmistakable holding of this Court for almost 50 years. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390 (1923), and Bartels v. Iowa, 262 US 404 (1923), this Court, in opinions...

...light of the special characteristics of the school environment, are available to teachers and students. It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers...unmistakable holding of this Court for almost 50 years." At the very least the suspension raises a serious constitutional question in the absence of provision...

...light of the special characteristics of the school environment, are available to teachers and students. It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers...unmistakable holding of this Court for almost 50 years." At the very least the suspension raises a serious constitutional question in the absence of provision...

...characteristics of school environment, are available to teachers and students (who, of course, do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate) , school officials, nevertheless, have comprehensive authority to prescribe and control, consistently...

...students are recognized as citizens and although the Supreme Court in one famous case has written, "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers...constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school house door," students, teachers, and administrators are generally unaware of what these rights...

...decisions on student free speech rights, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District* declared: "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers...freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."2 Holding that school officials violated the First Amendment rights of high school students who...

...general principles the Supreme Court has articulated. The Court has made clear that "students ... do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." But is has also made clear that "the constitutional rights of students in public schools are not automatically...

...to a landmark case before the Supreme Court, which asserted that even high school students did not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969), at 506. See Johnson, The Struggle for Student Rights. See...

...the language used by the Court to support its decision. Using powerful rhetoric, the Court declared, "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their Constitutional rights ... at the schoolhouse gate." The notion that school officials can arbitrarily control student speech...