United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 45Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 73
Side 574
... counsel However , counsel were obliged to be careful what they signed . If they put their hands to merely frivolous pleas , or otherwise misbehaved themselves in the conduct of their cases , they were liable to rebuke , sus- pension , a ...
... counsel However , counsel were obliged to be careful what they signed . If they put their hands to merely frivolous pleas , or otherwise misbehaved themselves in the conduct of their cases , they were liable to rebuke , sus- pension , a ...
Side 576
... counsel and the traditional practice of self - representation . The ban on counsel in felony cases , which had been substantially eroded in the courts , 26 was finally eliminated by statute in 1836.27 In more recent years , Parliament ...
... counsel and the traditional practice of self - representation . The ban on counsel in felony cases , which had been substantially eroded in the courts , 26 was finally eliminated by statute in 1836.27 In more recent years , Parliament ...
Side 579
... counsel in criminal cases , they also meticulously pre- served the right of the accused to defend himself personally . " [ 422 US 831 ] The recognition of the right of self - representation was not limited to the state lawmakers . As we ...
... counsel in criminal cases , they also meticulously pre- served the right of the accused to defend himself personally . " [ 422 US 831 ] The recognition of the right of self - representation was not limited to the state lawmakers . As we ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 65;Volumer 254-256 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1922 |
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 46 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1921 |
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 12;Volumer 46-49 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1901 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari