United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 45Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 83
Side 56
... Holding Company Act of 1956 , as amended . We do not so understand the law . The court relied on Whitney Bank v New Orleans Bank , 379 US 411 , 13 L Ed 2d 386 , 85 S Ct 551 , but the question in that case was the wholly different one of ...
... Holding Company Act of 1956 , as amended . We do not so understand the law . The court relied on Whitney Bank v New Orleans Bank , 379 US 411 , 13 L Ed 2d 386 , 85 S Ct 551 , but the question in that case was the wholly different one of ...
Side 75
... Holding Company Act of 1956 , 9 late the events therein described . Stan L Rev 333 , 337 , and n 59 ( 1957 ) . Congress , however , was ap- ests could be so structured that a holding company could elect a ma- jority of directors without ...
... Holding Company Act of 1956 , 9 late the events therein described . Stan L Rev 333 , 337 , and n 59 ( 1957 ) . Congress , however , was ap- ests could be so structured that a holding company could elect a ma- jority of directors without ...
Side
... holding that Indian tribe had standing to at- CITATOR SERVICE. 434 US 412 , 54 L Ed 2d 648 , 98 S Ct 694 , holding that prevailing defendant was enti- tled to attorneys fees under 42 USCS § 2000e - 5 ( k ) when discrimination suit under ...
... holding that Indian tribe had standing to at- CITATOR SERVICE. 434 US 412 , 54 L Ed 2d 648 , 98 S Ct 694 , holding that prevailing defendant was enti- tled to attorneys fees under 42 USCS § 2000e - 5 ( k ) when discrimination suit under ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 65;Volumer 254-256 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1922 |
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 46 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1921 |
United States Supreme Court Reports, Volum 12;Volumer 46-49 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1901 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari