Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

AMEND MENTS TO RULES

SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA 1

In Force September 1, 1918

The rules as promulgated on the above date read the same as the former rules now published at 148 N. W. vii, except as to the following rules. Additional matter is set in italics.

1. SITTINGS OF THE COURT.—The regular public sessions of this court will be held on the first and third Mondays of each month at 9 o'clock a. m., standard time, during each term.

11. BRIEFS. a. TIME OF SERVICE.-At the time of docketing each civil case the clerk of this court shall estimate the probable date on which the same will be reached for hearing, and thereupon fix and enter on the appearance docket the time, to be known as rule day, within which the plaintiff, relator, appellant or cross-appellant shall serve his brief on the opposite party or his attorney of record, which rule day shall be not less than ninety days before the date of hearing so estimated by the clerk. Within sixty days after rule day or within sixty days after such service the opposite party shall serve his brief on the first party, who may reply thereto within ten days thereafter, at his own expense, except in case of cross-appeal, when costs shall be taxed as usual for the answer brief of cross-appellee.

b. CRIMINAL CASEs.-In criminal cases the fortieth day after the docketing of the case shall be rule day, by which day the plaintiff in error shall serve his brief. The state shall serve its brief in thirty days thereafter.

c. ADVANCED CASES.–In advanced civil cases rule day shall be the thirtieth day after the order of advancement is entered, unless the court shall otherwise order, by which day the appellant shall serve his brief. Appellee shall serve his brief in thirty days thereafter. In cases arising under the Employers' Liability Act rule day shall be the twentieth day after the appeal is docketed. The appellee shall serve his brief within twenty days after rule day.

12. BRIEFS-HOW PREPARED.—(1) APPELLANT'S BRIEF.

(d) [The following is added at the end of this subdivision of the rule as published at 148 N. W. ix:]

Every reference to a statutory provision of Nebraska shall be to the edition of the Revised Statutes published by the state of Nebraska, if the provision is found thercin, or to the Session Law8.

1S. PR.ECIPE.

b. ON CRoss-APPEAL.-Coparties of appellants may join in the appeal or take crossappeal, or any appellee may take cross-appeal, by filing with the clerk of this court, within four months after the date of the judgment appealed from or the overruling of the motion for a new trial, a praecipe which shall designate the name of such party as cross-appellant, and the names of all adverse parties as cross-appellees.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 1

Adopted October 2, 1917 Rule 47. When a party fails to procure and of the court, the Chief Justice may make the file the proper return, the opposing party may proper order or judgment thereon with the move to dismiss the writ or the appeal, with same effect as if made by the court in ses

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

RULE XXXI. charged with the expense of investing such - sum, and of receiving and paying over the LIFE ESTATES AND ANNUITIES. interest or income thereof. In every case

Whenever a party as a tenant for life, or where a person is entitled to and consents by the curtesy, or dower, or other person is to accept a gross sum in lieu of annual inentitled to the annual interest or income of terest or income for life, the same shall any sum paid into the court and invested be estimated in the manner provided by secin permanent securities, such party shall be |tion 3871m of Wisconsin Statutes.

* For other rules, see 108 N. W. xx. x:

CASES REPORTED

Page Abbott v. Abbott (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 950 Abrahams, Wagner v. (S. D.) . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Geyer (N. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 731 Albert Solberg & Co. v. Rettinger (N. D.).. 572 Allard v. Curran (S. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761 Allegan Circuit Judge, Grand Rapids & I. R. Co. v. (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - 964 Allegan County Gas Co., Willage of Otsego V. (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 968 Allen, Jordan v. (Neb.). . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 594 American Brick & Tile Co., Stark v. (Iowa) S American Ins. Co. of Newark, N. J., v. Martinek (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 982 American Life Ins. Co., Straight v. (Iowa) 84

Ames Evening Times v. Ames Weekly Tribune (Iowa). . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 Ames Weekly Tribune, Ames Evening Times v. (Iowa). . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . 106 Anderson v. Anderson (S. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . 85’2 Anderson v. Burns (Iowa). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146

[ocr errors]

Anderson v. Robinson (S. D.)... . . . . . . . . . 5s) Anderson y. Skinner (S. D.). . S5. Andrews, Moore v. (Mich.)... .... 1037 Andrews v. Osius (Mich.). . . . ... 10:32

Ann Arbor R. Co., Block v. (Mich.).
Appanoose County, Pace v. (Iowa)...
Arends v. Frerichs (Iowa). . . . . . - - - -
Armitage, Braeder v. (N. D.). . . . . . . . . . . 171
Arnold, German Evangelical Peace Ass'n.
of Audubon v. (Iowa). ............... 77
Atlantic Southern R. Co., Loving v. (Iowa) 910
Attorney General v. City Election Commis:
sion of City of Detroit (Mich.) . . . . . . . . . 708
Attorney General v. Marx (Mich). . . . . . . .1605
Ausonhus, Sanden & Huso v. (Iowa)..... Sol
Austin, State v. (N.D.)...... . . . . . . . . . . . 790
Austin-Western Road." Machinery Co. v.
Owen (S.D.)................
Axford v. Western Syndicate Inv. Co.
(Minn.) ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

v. (Mich.) . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . 421 Boissineau v. Oscar Daniels Co. (Mich.). .1009 Hooth, Denton v. (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 Boots, Hansen v. (S. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 798 Bowker v. Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Rich

ardson County (Neb.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 Bowman v. Retelieuk (N. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . 576 Boysen, Illinois State Hank v. (Iowa). . . . . 786 Bradford & Co. v. Baxter (Mich.)......... 947

Praeder v. Armitage (N. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 Branstrom, Whitman v. (Mich.). . . . . . . . . Brastrup, Merchants' Nat. Bank v. (N. D.) 42 Preen v. Iowa Cent. R. Co. (Iowa). . . . . . . . 901 Brendlson v. Fa, Schuster & Co. (Wis.) Bressler, Ludwig v. (Neb.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brier v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. (Iowa) Bromeling v. Bromeling (Mich.) . . . . . . . . . 431 Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Kane

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

- 1.

Bruke Timber Co., Goldberg v. (Minn.).... 22 Pryan & Co. v. Scurlock (Iowa). ........ 144 Bunting v. Creglow (N. D.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 Burg, Keller Electric Co. v. (Minn.)... . . . 9S Burns, Anderson v. (Iowa). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 Purnside v. Craig (Minn.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 Burnside, Toohey v. (S. D.). . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Burt-Washington Drainage Dist. v. Rob

erts-Rose Ranch Co. (Neb.). . . . . . . . . . . 192 Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co.

(Minn.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1S Buvia v. Oscar Daniels Co. (Mich.)......1009

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

Schultz (Minn.) . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - -

Consolidation of School I)ists. in Iłlue

Earth County, two cases, In re (Minn.)
Coster v. Thompson Hotel Co. (Neb.)..
Coulter, Lehman v. (N. D.). . .
Courtney v. Youngs (Mich.). . . . . - - -
Couzens v. Sellers (Mich.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Doran, F. M. Sibley Lumber Co. v. (Mich.) 957

Dorchester Farmers' Co-op. Grain & I.ive

Stock Co., State v. (Neb.)............. 643

Doty v. Struble (Minn.)................ 551
Doty, Tuttle v. (Mich.)................. 990

Downing, Fleagle v. (Iowa). . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Richardson Coun-
ty, Bowker v. (Neb.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

Drainage Dist. No. 80 of Palo Alto County,

Johnston v. (Iowa). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SS6

Dramse v. Modern Woodmen of America
(Neh.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358

Droppers v. Marshall (Mich.). . . . . . . . . . . . 1001

I}uluth Casualty Ass'n, Phillips v. (Minn.) 9
Dunn, State v. (Minn.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Duplex Power Co., Toles v. (Mich.). . . . . . . 405
Dutton, Larson v. (N. D.)............... 625

[ocr errors][merged small]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]
« ForrigeFortsett »