Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction
J. Benjamins Pub., 1995 - 376 sider
The book gives a comprehensive introduction to Comparative Indo-European Linguistics, the first to appear in English. It starts with a presentation of the languages of the family (from English and the other Germanic languages, the Celtic and Slavic languages, Latin, Greek and Sanskrit through Armenian and Albanian) and a discussion of the culture and origin of the Indo-Europeans, the speakers of the Indo-European proto-language, who are considered to have lived in what is today the Ukraine.The book gives an introduction into the nature of language change and the methods of reconstruction of older language stages, with many examples (from the Indo-European languages). A full description is given of the sound changes, which makes it possible to follow the origin of the different Indo-European languages step by step. This is followed by a discussion of the development of all the morphological categories of Proto-Indo-European.
The book presents the latest in scholarly insights, like the laryngeal and glottalic theory, the accentuation, the ablaut patterns, and these are systematically integrated into the treatment.
While the book presents a large amount of material and discusses many principles and the relevant terminology, it is written in a very readable and lucid style. Use of the book is facilitated by an appendix on phonetics, a glossary, full indexes, and an extensive bibliography. The book can be used as a first introduction to the field, and at the same time brings the reader to the current moment of research.
Resultat 1-3 av 36
The ' facts ' as suggested by linguistic paleontology don ' t give us very much to
hold on to , but they do give us just enough . The fact that there are no words in
Indo - European for plants and animals which are typically southern , such as the
mechanism only affects stops which originally were voiced : why not facit , facitur ,
fēci , * fēctus ( it is factus ) . More important is that in my view this model will not
work . The proposition should give us * lēgitur , not lēctus . The passive perfect in
PIE ks would give Gr . ks , and PIE kt would give Skt . st . The correspondences
are : Skt . Av . Gr . kş xŠkt - kks š ks khth ks ( PIE - K - : a consonant group with
PIE k ) This problem has proven very exciting , because it involves a number of
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
LibraryThing ReviewBrukerevaluering - Mattitiahu - LibraryThing
Beekes presents an interesting, if in some places controversial, overview of the Indo-European languages and their comparative grammar. The book is divided into two parts. The first part deals with a ... Les hele vurderingen
The IndoEuropean Family of Languages
21 andre deler vises ikke
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Middle Voice: A Comparative Study in the Syntax-semantics Interface of German
Begrenset visning - 2002