Source Book in BioethicsAlbert R. Jonsen, Robert M. Veatch, LeRoy Walters Georgetown University Press, 1998 - 510 sider Government agencies and commissions, courts, and legislatures have during the past several decades produced reports, rendered decisions, and passed laws that have both defined the fundamental issues in the field of bioethics and established ways of managing them in our society. Providing a history of these key bioethical decisions, this "Source Book in Bioethics" is the first and only comprehensive collection of the critical public documents in biomedical ethics, including many hard-to-find or out-of-print materials.Covering the period from 1947 to 1995, this volume brings together core legislative documents, court briefs, and reports by professional organizations, public bodies, and governments around the world. Sections on human experimentation, care of the terminally ill, genetics, human reproduction, and emerging areas in bioethics include such pivotal works as "The Nuremberg Code", "The Tuskegee Report", and "In the Matter of Baby M", as well as less readily available documents as "TheDeclaration of Inuyama", the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences' statement on genetic engineering, and "The Warnock Committee Report" on reproductive technologies from the United Kingdom. Three eminent scholars in the field provide brief introductions to each document explaining the significance of these classic sources.This historical volume will be a standard text for courses in bioethics, health policy, and death and dying, and a primary reference for anyone interested in this increasingly relevant field. |
Inni boken
Resultat 1-3 av 61
Side 200
... supra note 23 , at 99 .... 26. See [ chapter 3 ; not reprinted here ] . 27. Making Health Care Decisions , supra note 1 , at 94–102 . One regular exception to this is that most people willingly let professionals make decisions for them ...
... supra note 23 , at 99 .... 26. See [ chapter 3 ; not reprinted here ] . 27. Making Health Care Decisions , supra note 1 , at 94–102 . One regular exception to this is that most people willingly let professionals make decisions for them ...
Side 459
... supra at notes 12-13 . 47. See Berkey v . Anderson , supra note 31 , 82 Cal.Rptr . at 78 ; Comment , Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice , 55 Calif . L.Rev . 1396 , 1409–10 ( 1967 ) . Medical custom bared in the cases indicates the ...
... supra at notes 12-13 . 47. See Berkey v . Anderson , supra note 31 , 82 Cal.Rptr . at 78 ; Comment , Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice , 55 Calif . L.Rev . 1396 , 1409–10 ( 1967 ) . Medical custom bared in the cases indicates the ...
Side 460
... supra note 68 , ( 1 / 800,000 chance of aplastic anemia ) ; Yeates v . Harms , supra note 68 ( 1.5 % chance of loss of eye ) ; Starnes v . Taylor , 272 N.C. 386 , 158 S.E.2d 339 , 344 ( 1968 ) ( 1/250 to 1/500 chance of perforation of ...
... supra note 68 , ( 1 / 800,000 chance of aplastic anemia ) ; Yeates v . Harms , supra note 68 ( 1.5 % chance of loss of eye ) ; Starnes v . Taylor , 272 N.C. 386 , 158 S.E.2d 339 , 344 ( 1968 ) ( 1/250 to 1/500 chance of perforation of ...
Innhold
A SHORT HISTORYAlbert R Jonsen | 5 |
The Nuremberg Code | 11 |
Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection | 22 |
Opphavsrett | |
29 andre deler vises ikke
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Source Book in Bioethics: A Documentary History Albert R. Jonsen,Robert M. Veatch,LeRoy Walters Begrenset visning - 1999 |
Source Book in Bioethics Albert R. Jonsen,Robert M. Veatch,LeRoy Walters Ingen forhåndsvisning tilgjengelig - 1998 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
abortion acceptable application appropriate assessment Baby K benefits Biomedical Brain Death child clinical Committee competent concern condition conduct considered couple court criteria decision decisionmaking determine diagnosis disease donation donor effective embryo transfer ethical evaluation federal fetal tissue fetus functions gene splicing gene therapy genetic screening genome guardian harm hospital human subjects incompetent individual infant infertility informed consent institution institutional review board interests intervention issues judgment kidney Medicine ment moral National organ donation organ procurement organ transplantation parents participation patient person physician possible potential pregnancy principles problems procedures professional programs proposed protection question reasonable recommends reproductive technologies require research involving respirator responsibility result resuscitation risk scientific self-determination sion social sperm standard statute supra note surrogacy surrogate mother syphilis Task Force terminate tion treat Tuskegee Syphilis Study vitro fertilization