 In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by an employee in the course of his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense : 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...  Labor Bulletin - Side 136av Massachusetts. Department of Labor and Industries. Division of Statistics - 1911Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Kentucky - 1916 - 804 sider
...upon any or all of the following grounds : (1) That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence. (2) That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant of the injured employe. (3) That the employe has assumed the risk of injury. § 76b. Every... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 812 sider
...by the act. The defenses referred to are: (1) That the employee was negligent, unless wilfully so; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant; (3) that the employee had assumed the risks inherent in, incidental to, or arising out of... | |
 | 1915 - 1336 sider
...statute enacted for the safety of the employes contributed to the injury or death of such employé. "2. That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employé. "3. That the employe had assumed the risk of the injury incident to his employment; but such... | |
 | 1920 - 1206 sider
...employment, it shall not be a defense: (1) That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence ; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employé; (3) but said article further provides that the employer may defend upon the ground that the... | |
 | 1913 - 1314 sider
...employment, or for death gated. resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. Farm laborers, SEC. 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to etc- recover damages... | |
 | 1918 - 454 sider
...so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence. 2. That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employe. 3. That the employe had assumed the risk of the injury Incident to his employment; but such... | |
 | 1910 - 1412 sider
...( 1 ) That there was no evidence from which the jury could find the defendant guilty of negligence; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant; and (3) that the plaintiff assumed the risk. It is argued that the plaintiff failed to show... | |
 | 1911 - 388 sider
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent ; 2. That the injury...their reference to negligence as meaning contributory iijpence or negligence on the part of a fellow servant which falls short of the serious and willful... | |
 | West Virginia. Employers' Liability and Laborers' Compensation Commission - 1911 - 282 sider
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. Sec. 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to recover damages for personal injuries... | |
 | 1911 - 416 sider
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense : 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. SECTION 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to recover damages for personal... | |
| |
