eds

to.

POLE,) to admit that the House had the power without any disrespect to the gentleman from foto punish those who disturbed or impeded its Ohio, or any other member of that House, he proceedings. This is the right which the peo ple naturally have to protect themselves. He asked, if the exercise of the right was not as requisite to prevent disturbance or impediment out of the House as in it? Of course it was; as there was no difference between violence of fered for words spoken there in debate, whe- Mr. DICKSON called for the reading of the 30ther the violence was offered in it, or out of it. proceedings of the House in the case of RanHe continued, by stating that he was no advo- dall, which were accordingly read by the clerk. cate for the inviolability of a representative of Mr. PATTON--The precise question bethe people, except in his representative capa- fore the House was on the amendment of the city; and, after some further remarks, he said, gentleman from North Carolina, (Mr. SPEIGHT.) that so far as the power to punish contempt Mr. P. said, the House was callen on, in this was concerned, the House, without it, could case, to act in the character of a judicial tribuscarcely be considered as possessing the power nal, for the protection of themselves in the ex30 of existing; for, if such outrages were permit-ercise of their legislative functions; in the perted to pass with impunity, Congress could be formance of this judicial duty, they should be insulted, and coerced into the adoption of the blind to all political considerations, and hold most corrupt, wanton, and destructive mea- the scales with an even hand, without regard to individuals or parties.