AIFFENDIX F.

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE INCOME ACCOUNT OF
RAILWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES FOR
THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1899.

NoTE.—The report embraced in this appendix is published as a separate document.

INDEX.

Page.

ABSTRACT QUESTIONS ---------------------------------------------------- 223
AccIDENTS, RAILWAY ------------------------------------------------ 54–57, 62,63
ACT OF -

February 11, 1893------------ --------------------------------------- 74

March 2, 1898---------------------------------------------------- 50–54, 259

July 2, 1890---------------------------------------------------- 10, 14–19,67
Acts ANd DoINGs of THE GRAND TRUNK RY. Co. of CANADA, RE.----------- 127
ACT TO REGULATE COMMERCE

amendments recommended ----------------------------------------

appropriations and expenditures --
cases decided under, during year --

civil cases pending under-------------------------------------------- 4
classification.---------------------------------- 6, 7, 12–20,46, 47,48, 84,85
common control, management, or arrangement----------------------- 79,226
complaint---------------------------------------------------------- 226
covers both direct and indirect damages.------------------------------ 25
enforcement of.----------------------------------------------------- 5, 7
formal proceedings under-------------------------------------------
inadequacy of.----------------------------------------------------- 5, 7, 20
measures to secure requirement with-------------------------------- 5, 7
office work under-------------------------------------------------- 49, 50
power of commission over rates------------------------------------ 20, 70, 72
practice------------------------
purpose of ------
rate cutting
rebates ------------------------------------------------- 11, 45,46, 75, 76,236
reparation ------------------------------------------------ 25,46,47,234,237
section 1-------------------------------- 39,46,47,48,68, 70,71, 73,75,229,236
section 2-------------------------- 12, 21, 26, 34,43,46, 47,48, 76, 78,79,237,241
section 3---------------------------------------------------------- 21, 23, 29
30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 39–42, 46,47, 48,66,68, 70, 71, 73, 75, 76, 79,80,235,239
section 4------------------- 27, 28–33,44, 45,46,47, 48,66,68, 69, 70,230, 233,237
section 5------------------------------------------------------ 10, 12, 22,229
section 6--------------------- 8
section 7----------------------------------------------------------- 38
section 9------------------------- -- 233
Section 10 - 73, 74,228
Section 12
Section 13 239
section 14---------------------------------------------------------- 230
section 15---------------------------------------------------------- 230
section 16---------------------------------------------------------- 230, 238
section 17---------------------------------------------------------- 238
section 21---------------------------------------------------------- 240
section 22---------------------------------------------------------- 43,240
self-incrimination -------------------------------------------------- 74, 75
uniform classification --------------------------------------------- 6, 8, 84,85
Violations---------------------------------------------------------- 45,46
ADVANCES IN FREIGHT RATES-------------------------------------- 7, 12, 20, 47,48
AGREEMENTS ---------------------------------------- --- 29, 67, 76, 79–81,223
ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN R. R. Co. ET AL., RE------------------------- 203
ALABAMA MIDLAND RY. Co. ET AL.,
Board of Trade of Troy v.------------------------------------------- 174
Interstate Commerce Commission v.------------------------------ 32,66, 69, 71

Page.

35, 36

46,47

ALFoRD v. CHICAGo, Rock Island AND PACIFIc Ry. Co 135

ALLEGED DISTURBANCE IN PASSENGER RATES BY CANADIAN PAcific Ry. Co., RE- 211

ALLEGED ExCESSIVE FREIGHT RATES AND CHARGEs on Food PRodUCTs, RE--- 141
ALLEGED UNLAwFUL chARGEs For THE TRANSPORTATION of coal, BY THE

Louisville AND NASH VILLE R. R. Co., RE ------------------------- 169

ALLEGED UNLAwFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANSPORTATION of cot-
ToN BY THE KANSAs CITY, MEMPHis AND BIRMINGHAM R. R. Co.
ET AL-, RE --------------- --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42,213

ALLEGED UNLAWFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANspoRTATION of GRAIN
AND GRAIN PRODUCTs BY THE Atchison, Topeka & SANTA FE Ry. Co.

ET AL-, RE-------------------------------------------------------- 193, 199
ALLEGED UNLAwFUL TRANSPORTATION CHARGES BY ILLINois CENTRAL R. R.
Co., RB---------------------------------------------------------- 192
ALLEGED violations of THE ACT To REGULATE commeRCE BY THE St. Louis
AND SAN FRANCISCO RY. Co---------------------------------------- 28, 218
ALLEGHENY WALLEY RY. Co. ET AL., Wolf BROTHERS v.------------------- 194
ALLEN ET AL.
v. Carolina Midland Ry. Co. et al------------------------------------ 210
v. Louisville New Albany and Chicago R. R. Co ---------------------- 104
ALMANACS ---------------------------------------- 47
AMENDMENT 223
AMENDMENTs
to the act ----------------- ------ - - - - - - - - - - - -
recommendation of railroad commissioners
AMERICAN WAREHOUSEMEN's Association v. ILLINois CENTRAL R. R. Co. ET AL- 208
AMERICUS, GA --------------------------------------------------------- 35, 36,37
ANDREws SoAP Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND ST. Louis Ry. Co. ET AL- - - 140

ANNAPOLIs, WASHINGTON AND BALTIMORE R. R. Co. ET AL., IN RE
ANokA, MINN---------------------------------------------------

ANTITRUST ACT -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
commission can not enforce-----------------------
official classification not contrary to ---------------------------------
ANTHONY SALT Co.
v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co ----. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
v. St. Louis and San Franciseo Ry. Co -----------------------------
APPEAL FROM CoMMISSIONER OF PATENTS.--------------------------------
APPENDIX A -----------------------------------------------------------

- --- 277
APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RAILROAD COMPANIES FOR A FURTHER EXTENSION
OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY

APPLIANCE ACT, RE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50–54, 221, 237,259
APPLICATIONS FoR RELIEF FROM THE operation of THE FOURTH SECTION ---- 48,237
APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES OF THE COMMISSION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87
ARKANSAS------------------------------------------------- -- - - - - - - - - - - 58, 74, 75
ARRANGEMENT--------------------------------------------- 223

ARRANGEMENTS, JOINT-
ASBESTOS ARTICLES ------------------------------------------------------
Associated WHOLESALE GROCERs of St. Louis v. Missouri PACIFIC RY. Co--- 103

Association of AMERICAN RAILWAY Accounting OFFICERS 84
MANUFACTURERs, MERCHANTS, AND MILLERS ------------- - 9

ASSOCIATIONS, TRAFFIC---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - 12–20

ATCHISON, Top EKA AND SANTA FE R. R. Co. ET AL. -
Duncan v --------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176
Freeman v.--------------------------------------------------------- 198
Gustin v----------------------------------------- - 37,217
Johnston-Larimer Dry Goods Co. v.---------------- - 191
Matthews v ------------ , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 165
Rice v --------------------------------------------------------- - - 146
San Bernardino Board of Trade v------------------------------------ 142