CoNFERENCES WITH RAILWAY PRESIDENTS --------------------------------. 8–12
beneficial results of------------------------------------------------- 11
considerable influence of.-------------------------------------------- 12
existence of former associations not taken into account---------------- 8
mutual and concurrent promises necessary --------------------------- 10
to bring about an observance of the law.------------------------------ 9
to secure a pledge to adhere to published rates------------------- ----- 9
CoNGREss--------------------------------------------- 7, 9,46, 50, 75, 76, 81, 82,84
power of, to authorize a Federal court to review the action of an execu-
tive officer--------------------------------------------------- 81, 82
CoNNECTING LINEs ---------------------------------------------- 37, 70, 73, 77,226
CoNSoLIDATION OF RAILWAYS--------------------------------------------- 6, 7, 226
CoNSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES ------------------------------------ 78, 79,81
CoNTINUING or FENSE.---------------------------------------------------- 73
CoNTINUOUS CARRIAGE OR SHIPMENT------------------------------- 37, 70, 73,77,226
CoNTRACTs----------------------------------------------------- 75, 76, 79–81,226
between railroads -------------------------------------------------- 79–81
special rate -------------------------------------------------------- 75, 76
CoNVENTION OF RAILROAD CoMMISSIONERs, NATIONAL ----------------------- 84, 85
CoNWAY. Mo----------------------------------------------------------- 47
CoRDELE MACHINE SHOP v. LouisvillE & NASHVILLE R. R. Co. ET AL--------- 184
CoRN----------------------------------------------- 20, 22, 23, 30, 33, 34, 35,46,48
Cost of SERVICE.------------------------------------------------------ 26, 34, 227
Cost of PRODUCTION ---------------------------- ------------------------- 227
Cortos-------------------------------------------------------- 39, 42,43, 77,227
Council, BLUFFs, Iowa ------------------------------------------------- 47
CouncILL v. WESTERN AND ATLANTIC R. R. Co -------------------------- 105
Counsel AND ATToRNEY's FEEs ------------------------------------------ 227
CoupleRs, AUTOMATIC --------------------------- 48, 50–54, 59, 82, 83, 84, 85,237,259
Count DEcisions-------------------------------------------------------- 66–84
Ault case ---------------------------------------------------------- 73, 74
Belknap case------------------------------------------------------- 73, 74
Cattle Raisers' Association case-------------------------------------- 71–73
Chattanooga case--------------------------------------------------- 66–68
Duell case --------------------------------------------------------- 81, 82
Georgia Railroad commission cases ---------------------------------- 69–71
Kizer case --------------------------------------------------------- 75, 76
La Grange case----------------------------------------------------- 68
mileage tickets case ------------------------------------------------ 78, 79
North Dakota case ------------------------------------------------- 83
Post case ---------------------------------------------------------- 76, 78
Price case---------------------------------------------------------- 74, 75
South Dakota case ------------------------------------------------- 82–83
Troxler case ------------------------------------------------------- 83, 84
Winters' case------------------------------------------------------- 79–81
Courts, UNITED STATES, CIVIL CASEs PENDING IN--------------------------- 44,45
CoVINGTON STOCK YARDS CASE ------------------------------------------- 72
CowPN v. WINTERS ----------------------------------------------------- 79–81
CoxE BROTHERS AND COMPANY v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. R. Co---------------- 153
CREws ET AL. v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE R. R. Co ------------. ---------- 107
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGs-------------------------------------------------- 45,46
unsuccessful 8, 9
CULLOM BILL----------------------------------------------------------- 6, 243
CULLOM, SENATOR 6
CUMBERLAND RIVER ---------------------------------------------------- 43,47
CURRENT LIABILITIES
amount of --------------------------------------------------------- 60
interest bearing, interest accrued on --------------------------------- 62
of roads in hands of receivers---------------------------------------- 62
CUT RATES ------------------------------------------------------------- 12
DALLAs FREIGHT BUREAU v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RY. Co. ET AL ---------- 210
DALLAS, TEX-----------------------------------------------------------
DAMAGES -------------------------------------------

direct and indirect
DANIELs v. CHICAGo, Rock IslanD AND PACIFIC RY. Co. ET AL
v. Great Northern Ry. Co. et al ------------------------------------- 187
DANVILLE, VA---------------------------------------------------------- 46,48
Page.
DAVIS WILLIAM F------------------------------------------------------ 45
DAWSON, GA ---------------------------------------------------------- 35, 36,37
DECISIONs -
Commission-------------------------------------------------------- 20–44
court-------------------------------------------------------------- 66–84
DEDUCTIONS FROM INCOME------------------------------------------------ 62
analysis of.-------------------------------------------------------- 62
other-------------------------------------------------------------- 62
DEFECTS IN THE ACT----------------------------------------------------- 5, 7, 20
DELAwarE AND HUDSON CANAL Co. ET AL., THATCHER v-------------------- 103
DELAwarE, LACKAwanA AND WESTERN R. R. Co. ET AL.
Milk Producers' Protective Association v.-----------------------------
Page et al. v.------------------------------- -
Shamberg v.--------------------------------------------------------
DELAwarE, LACKAwan NA AND WESTERN. R. R. Co.
Haddock v--------------------------------------------------------- 150
Te ----------------------------------------------------------------- 201
DELAwarE STATE GRANGE v. NEw York, PHILADELPHIA AND Norfolk R. R.
Co. ET AL---------------------------------------------------- 118, 155, 163
Dr. Loach, CHARLEs J.-------------------------------------------------- 46
DEMORALIZATION IN RATEs---- 8, 12
DEMURRAGE CHARGES.--------------- 227
DEPositions------------------------------------------------------------ 227
DETROIT BoARD OF TRADE ET AL. v. GRAND TRUNK RY. OF CANADA ET AL-- 120
DETROIT, GRAND HAVEN AND MILWAUKEE RY. Co., STONE & CARTEN v----- 137
DETROIT, MICH---------------------------------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT companies------------------------------------------------
DEVIATION FROM PUBLISHED RATES.----------------------------------
DIFFERENTIAL RATES -----------------------------------------

DISABLED soldiers AND SAILORS, RE
DistANCE ----------------------------------------------
District of Columbia --------------------------------------------------
Distribution of CARs---------------------------------------------------
DIVERSION OF TRAFFIC---------------------------------------------------
DIVIDENDS DECLARED DURING THE YEAR, AMOUNT OF ---------------------- 62,65
DividenDs on stocks owned-------------------------------------------- 62
rates of paid-------------------------------------------------------
DIVISION OF THROUGH RATES------------------------------------- 23, 24, 40, 41,227
DoCUMENTARY EVIDENCE - - 228
DoMESTIC TRAFFIC ----------- -
DRAWBARS -------------------------------------------------------------
standard height of.-------------------------------------------------
DUE PRocess of LAW-----------------------------------------------
DULUTH; MINN -------------------------------------------------------- 31, 32,83
DUNCAN v. ATCHISON, TopFKA AND SANTA FE R. R. Co. ET AL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176
v. Southern Pacific Co. et al 176
DUVAL, Bishop v -------------------------------------------------------
Harris v ----------------
EARNINGS AND EXPENSEs
EARNINGs

eXpress - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61
from carrying mail------------------------------------------------- 61
from operation, gross ---------------------------------------------- 61, 65,82
interstate---------------------------------------------------------- 82
local -------------------------------------------------------------- 82, 83
net---------------------------------------------------------------- 61
of railway property------------------------------------------------- 64
other-------------------------------------------------------------- 61
per mile of line ---------------------------------------------------- 61
EAST Boston, MAss ---------------------------------------------------- 21
EAST St. Louis, ILL ---------------------------------------------------- 29,47
EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA R. R. Co. ET AL
Little Rock and Memphis R. R. Co. v. ------------------------------- 127
Board of Trade of Chattanooga v ------------------------------------ 171
Farrar & Co. v.----------------------------------------------------- 108
Heck and Petree v-------------------------------------------------- 109
v. Interstate Commerce Commission---------------------------------- 66

James & Abbott v. ------------------------------------------------- 132
Page.
EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RY. Co., PYLE & SoNs, v. --------- 108
EAU CLAIRE BoARD of TRADE v. Chicago, MILwAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RY.
O. ET AL-------------------------------------------------------- 165
EIGHTH SECTION -------------------------------------------------------- 228
ELECTRIC RAILWAYS----------------------------------------------------- 228
ELEVATOR CHARGES ----------------------------------------------------- 228
Elk River, MINN-------------------------------------------------- 30, 32,47, 48
ELVEY v. ILLINois CENTRAL R. R. Co------------------------------------- 138
EMERSON v. CHICAGO AND NorthwestERN RY. Co-------------------------- 182
v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Ry. Co -------------------------- 182
EMPLOYEEs of CoMMIssion----------------------------------------------- 87
EMPLOYEEs of RAILWAYS
assigned to conducting transportation.------------------------------- 59
assigned to general administration.---------------------------------- 59
assigned to maintenance of equipment ------------------------------- 59
assigned to maintenance of way and structures ----------------------- 59
casualities to----------------------------------------------------- 54, 57,259
compensation of---------------------------------------------------- 60
#." number of ------------------------------------------------- 63
killed, number of -------------------------------------------------- 63
number of --------------------------------------------------------- 59
per 100 miles of line------------------------------------------------ 59, 60
EMPORIUM, PA---------------------------------------------------------- 47
ENCOURAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIES.------------------------------------------ 228
ENFORCEMENT of the Act ---------------------------------------------- 5, 7
ENGINEMEN, NUMBER or ------------------------------------------------- 59
Equality-------------------------------------------------------------- 228
Equipment ------------------------------------------------------------ 228
density------------------------------------------------------------ 58, 59
fitted with automatic couplers---------...----------------------------- - 59
fitted with train brakes--------------------------------------------- 59
trust obligations---------------------------------------------------- 60
Estoppel -------------------------------------------------------------- 228
EUFAULA, ALA---------------------------------------------------------- 35, 36
EUREKA SPRINGs Ry. Co., BoARD of RAILROAD AND WAREHouse CoMMission-
ERs of Missouri v.------------------------------------------------ 194
EUREKA SPRINGs RY. Co. ET AL., CARY ET AL. v.---------------------------- 202
EwANs v. OREGON RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION CoMPANY--------------------- 105
v. Union Pacific Ry. Co. et at --------------------------------------- 189
Evidence --------------------------------------------------------- 23,35, 38,228
Excursion RATES AND Tickets ------------------------------------------- 228
ExECUTIVE officer, Power of CoNGRESs To AUTHoRize A FEDERAL court To
REVIEW ACTION OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81, 82
ExEMPTION OF WITNESSES FROM PROSECUTION AFTER TESTIFYING IN PROCEEDINGs
UNDER THE ACT --------------------------------------------------- 74, 75
Ex PARTE APPLICATION -------------------------------------------------- 228
ExPENDITUREs of THE CoMMIssion---------------------------------------- 87
ExPENSEs, operating --------------------------------------------------- 61,234
per mile of line----------------------------------------------------- 61
ExpoRTRATES ---------------------------------------------------------- 229
from points east and west of the Mississippi River, re ----------------- 20,215
EXPORT TRADE OF BostoN, RE------------------------------------------- 100
ExPRESS companies----------------------------------------------------- 106,229
ExPRESS CoMPANY v. Kountz-------------------------------------------- 77
FACILITIES of TRAFFic-------------------------------------------------- 38,229
FAIRBURN, GA --------------------------------------------------------- 68
FALLING FROM TRAINS -------------------------------------------------- 55,259
FALL RIVER, MAss----------------------------------------------------- 77
FALSE BILLING -------------------------------------------------------- 45, 73,74
FARGo, N. DAK-------------------------------------------------------- 44
FARRAR & Co. v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RY. Co. ET AL-- 108
FAST-FREIGHT LINES ---------------------------------------------------- 229
FAST-TRAIN SERVICE.----------------------------------------------------- 229
FAvor IN TRANSPORTATION ---------------------------------------------- • 229

(See Preference or advantage.)
FedERAL AUTHORITY---------------------------------------------------- 229

Page.
FEDERAL courts, Power of CoNGRESs To AUTHORIZE A REVIEw of THE ACTION
OF AN EXECUTIVE OFFICER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81, 82
FERRY EXPENSES-------------------------------------------------------- 229
FEWELL v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE R. R. Co. ET AL--------------------- 202
FIFER, HoN. Joseph W. ------------------------------------------------- 85
FIFTEENTH SECTION ----------------------------------------------------- 230
FIFTH SECTION ---------------------------- 10, 12, 22, 229
FILING OF TARIFFS ------------- - 49, 5
FINDINGs of FACT BY CoMMIssion : 68,80, 81,229
FIREMEN, NUMBER or --------------------------------------------------- 9
FIRST SECTION------------------------------- 39, 46,47, 48,68, 70, 71, 73, 75,229, 236
Fish CoMMISSION------------------------------------------------------- 100,229
FITCHBURG R. R. Co., RE----------------------------------------------- 190
Fixing RATES -------------------------------------------------------- 67, 70,236
FLINT AND PERE MARQUETTE R. R. Co. ET AL.
Michigan Box Co. v.------------------------------------------------ 183
Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v 124
Floating cotton------------------------------------------------------- 42, 43
FLORENCE RAILROAD Co. ET AL., BoARD of RAILROAD CoMMISSIONERs of SouTH
CAROLINA " ------------------------------------------------------ 210
Pionina --------------------------------------------------------------- 39
FLORIDA CENTRAL AND PENINSULAR R. R. Co. ET AL., PERRY v-------------- 161
FLORIDA RAILROAD CoMMIssion v. SAVANNAH, FLORIDA AND WESTERN RY. Co.
* AL------------------------------------------------------------ 158, 162
Flour:-------------------------------------- 20, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, 34,47, 229, 242
FooD PRODUCTs--------------------------------------------------------- 30
Foreign MERCHANDise -------------------------------------------------- 230
ForM AND CONTENTs of RATE SCHEDULES, RE ------------------------------- 180
FoRT WoRTH AND DENVER CITY RY. Co. ET AL., CATTLE RAISERs' Association
of TEXAS "------------------------------------------------------- 207,208
FourTEENTH SECTION---------------------------------------------------- 230
FourTH SECTION ---------------- 27, 28–33,44, 45,46,47, 48,66,68, 69, 70,230, 233,237
Fourth-TRACK MILEAGE.------------------------------------------------- 58
FRAUDs---------------------------------------------------------------- 230
FREE CARTAGE of FREIGHT ---------------------------------------------- 230
FREEMAN v. ATCHISON, TopekA AND SANTA FE R. R. Co. ET AL ----------- 198
FREMONT, ELKHoRN AND Missouri VALLEY R. R. Co. ET AL., RE ---------- 182
FREE PASSES AND FREE TRANSPORTATION---------------------------------- 230
FREE storage of FREIGHT ---------------------------------------------- 230
FREIGHT -
classification -------------------------- 6, 7, 8, 12–20, 38, 39,46, 47,48, 84, 85,225
continuous carriage of ------------------------------------------ 37, 70, 73,77
carried per freight locomotive --------------------------------------- 59
cars, number of, in service ------------------------------------------ 58
free cartage of.----------------------------------------------------- 230
locomotives, number of, in service----------------------------------- 58
misdescription ----------------------------------------------------- 240
misrouting of -------------------------------- ---------------------- 47
perishable --------------------------------------------------------- 234
rates to competing localities------------------------- 8, 23,66, 67, 69,70, 71,226
reshipment of ------------------------------------------------------ 237
TeVenue- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
routing of---------

tons of, carried
tons of, carried 1 mile

tons of, carried 1 mile per mile of line-------------------------------- 61
Volume of.---------------------------------------------------- 6, 7, 11, 52, 55
War --------------------------------------------------------------- 12
Freight Bureau, Memphis.--------------------------------------------- 43
FREIGHT BUREAU of CINCINNATI CHAMBER of CoMMERCE v. CINCINNATI, NEw
ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RY. Co. ET AL------------------------ 179, 197
FULTON v. CHICAGo, St. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA R. R. Co -------- 101
FUNDED DEBT
amount of.--------------------------------------------------------- 60
amount of, paying no interest---------------------------------------- 60
interest accrued on ------------------------------------------------- 62

of roads in hands of receivers---------------------------------------- 62
Page.
GALLATIN, TENN-------------------------------------------------------- 42
GALVESTON, Tex------------------------------------------------------- 25, 28, 29
GENERAL ExPENSEs, operating ------------------------------------------ 61
GENERAL office work of THE CoMMIssion
operating division-------------------------------------------------- 49
rates and transportation division.------------------------------------ 49, 50
statistical division------------------------------------------------- 50
GEORGIA RAILROAD CoMMISSION CASEs ---------------------------------- 44, 69,90
GEORGIA RAILROAD CoMMIssion v. CLYDE STEAMSHIP Co. ET AL ----------- 167
GeoRGIA R. R. Co., HEARD v ------------------------------------------- 107, 128
GERKE BREwing Co. v. Louisville ANd NASHVILLE R. R. Co. ET AL -----. 172
GILL, C. E------------------------------------------------------------- 14, 15
GossLER & Co. v. WESTERN MARYLAND R. R. Co------------------------- 43
Government own ERSHIP------------------------------------------------ 5
GRAB IRONs------------------------------------------------------------ 52,230
GRAIN------------------------------------ - - - 20, 21, 23, 24, 27, 30, 34, 35,46,48,230
GRAIN SHIPPERs' Association of Northwest Iowa v. ILLINois CENTRAL
R. R. Co. ET AL------------------------------------------------- 34,214
GRAND TRUNK RY. of CANADA ET AL.
Detroit Board of Trade et al. v.------------------------------------- 120
McMorran et al. v.-------------------------------------------------- 131
GREATER CHARGE FoR SHORTER THAN FOR LONGER HAULS------------------ 27,
28–33,44, 45,46, 47, 48,66,68, 69, 70,230, 233,237
GREAT LAKES---------------------------------------------------------- 25, 26
GREAT NorthERN RY. Co. ET AL.
Chamber of Commerce of Minneapolis v ----------------------------- 171
Daniels" ---------------------------------------------------------- 187
Te ----------------------------------------------------------------- 197
GREENE ET AL. v. NEw York CENTRAL AND HUDsoN RIVER R. R. Co. ET AL- - - 134
GRIFFEE v. BURLINGTON AND MIssouri River R. R. Co. IN NEBRASKA, ET AL- 120
GRIFFIN, GA ----------------------------------------------------------- 44
GRIGGs, HoN. J. W----------------------------------------------------- 16, 19
GRoss EARNINGs of RAILWAYS------------------------------------------- 61,65
GROUP RATPs----------------------------------------------------------- 67,230
GUILFord, NATHAN----------------------------------------------------- 15
GULF of Mexico.------------------------------------------------------- 46,48
GULF Ports-------------------------------------------------------- 22, 23, 24, 25
GUSTIN v. ATCHISON, Topeka AND SANTA FE R. R. Co. ET AL - - - - - - - - - - - - 37,217
v. Illinois Central R. R. Co. et al.-------------------------------------- 203 .
GUTHRIP, KY----------------------------------------------------------- 47
HADDock v. DELAwarE, LACKAwan NA AND WESTERN R. R. Co------------- 150
HAGERsroWN, MD ------------------------------------------------------ 43,47
HAMILTON AND BRowN v. CHATTANooga, RomE AND Columbus R. R. Co. ET AL- 154
HAND Holbs ----------------------------------------------------------- 52
HARDING v. CHICAGo, St. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA R. R. Co-------- 101
HARDWARE------------------------------------------------------------- 49
HARRIOTT, FRANK ------------------------------------------------------ 15
HARRIS v. DUVAL ------------------------------------------------------- 128
HARVARD Co. v. PENNSYLVANIA Co. ET AL-------------------------------- 146
HARVEY v. LouisvillE AND NASH VILLE R. R. Co------------------------- 162
HARWELL ET AL. v. Columbus AND WESTERN R. R. Co. ET AL-------------- 105
HEARD v. GEORGIA R. R. Co-------------------------------------------- 107, 128
HEARINGs of THE CoMMISSION 13, 20, 29, 46,48,230, 231
HECK AND PETREE v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RY. Co. ET AL- 109
HEYBURN, WILLIAM----------------------------------------------------- 45
HEzel MILLING CoMPANY v. St. Louis, ALTon AND TERRE HAUTE R. R. Co.
RT AL- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159
HILL AND BRo. v. NASHVILLE, CHATTANooga AND ST. Louis Ry. Co. ET AL--- 184
HINDRANCEs. To REGULATION--------------------------------------------- 5, 7, 20
Hogansvillo, GA ------------------------------------------------------ 68
Hogs AND Hog PRODUCTs ----------------------------------------------- 231
Holbrook ET AL. v. St. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND MANITOBA. R. R. Co ----- 101
Hoskins, NEBR--------------------------------------------------------- 47
HoweLL ET AL. v. NEw York, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN R. R. Co. ET AL- 119
HURLBURT v. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SouthERN RY. Co-------------- 116

ILLINois -------------------------------------------------------------- 22, 23, 84