 | 1869 - 972 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases; it has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1867 - 468 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. (3) That principle is acted upon every day in (1) 7 H. & N. 172; 30 LJ (Ex.) 337. (2) Hern v. Nichols,... | |
 | Albert Venn Dicey - 1870 - 582 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved ... In all ^the] cases [in which the master has been held liable], it may he said that the master has... | |
 | India - 1878 - 710 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1874 - 880 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master can be proved." Ill Fuller v. Wilson, which was an action on the case for a fraudulent misrepresentation... | |
 | Thomas William Saunders - 1874 - 238 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the matter be proved : (Laugher v. Pointer, 5 B. & C. 547, at p. 554.) That principle is acted upon every... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 830 sider
...the master is anewerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher p. Pointer, о Barn. & C. 047, 554. The nature of the action is still... | |
 | Melville Madison Bigelow - 1875 - 808 sider
...for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and lor the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; " citing Laugher v. Pointer, 5 Barn. & C. 547, 554. The nature of the action is still more... | |
 | William Evans - 1879 - 802 sider
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service, and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the (o) Hamilton v. Wright, 12 Cl. & F. (p) Cornfoot v. Fowke, 6 M. & W. 109; but see Lee v. Jones, 34... | |
| |
The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved. 
