 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1953 - 968 sider
...property for the United States, or on its behalf, except that the foregoing provision shall not apply to the transportation of military or naval property...moving for military or naval and not for civil use * * *.1 Plaintiff, on the authority of United States v. Powell, 330 US 238, contends that the shipments... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1955 - 936 sider
...property for the United States, or on its behalf, except that the foregoing provision shall not apply to the transportation of military or naval property...States moving for military or naval and not for civil UBP • • •. 753 Findings of Fact additional $34,171.55, whereas should defendant prevail, plaintiff... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1947 - 806 sider
...situation in that it restricted land-grant deductions, as far as Federal property was concerned, to "transportation of military or naval property of the...moving for military or naval and not for civil use." The sole question here, then, is was the movement of the property thus transported that kind of transportation.... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1958 - 966 sider
...scrap steel to Inland, the Maritime Commission had stated that the scrap steel was "military" or was "military or naval property of the United States moving for military or naval and not for civil use", or some equivalent terminology, and on all but 16 of the 79 bills of lading the originating carrier had... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1955 - 928 sider
...and tendered by the United States, but do not agree to notation thereon that the property shipped is military or naval property of the United States, moving for military or naval and not for 129 C. Cls. Opinion of the Court civil use." Furthermore, testimony indicates that it was the policy... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1955 - 1002 sider
...Transportation Act of 1940. We conclude, therefore, that in each case here in question the property shipped was military or naval property of the United States moving for military or naval use within the meaning of section 321 (a) of the Transportation Act of 1940. Hence the carrier was... | |
 | United States - 1936 - 684 sider
...property for the United States, or on its behalf, except that the foregoing provision shall not apply to the transportation of military or naval property...transportation of members of the military or naval forces of the United States (or of property of such members) when such members are traveling on official duty... | |
 | United States, Margaret Garrett Young - 1937 - 312 sider
...property for the United States, or on its behalf, except that the foregoing provision shall not apply to the transportation of military or naval property...transportation of members of the military or naval forces of the United States (or of property of such members) when such members are traveling on official duty;... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1940 - 216 sider
...than the full applicable commercial rates, fares, or charges. This exemption does not apply, however, to the "transportation of military or naval property...transportation of members of the military or naval forces of the United States (or of property of such members) when such members are traveling on official duty."... | |
| |
States, or on its behalf, except that the foregoing provision shall not apply to the transportation of military or naval property of the United States moving for military or naval and not for civil use... 
