4 5. Violating the 1st Amendment by getting gag orders on federal judges to prevent publication of opinions unfavorable to the IRS (Winner), 6. Bragging "we may not be able to convict Kilpatrick, but we can break him and we intend to because this case will make my entire career (Birchal), 7. Making up testimony when the facts don't fit what they want to hear, 8. Shredding documents potentially favorable to me in the American Embassy in Costa Rica, 9. Putting me in jail for 22 hours with testimony they knew was perjured, because I believe they created the perjury themselves. I believe, and the record seems to prove, they exchanged it for reducing a convicted felon's $500,000 theft to a misdemeanor, dropping felony charges for 7 years of illegal flight to avoid incarceration, reducing a 12 year sentence to 3 hours in Atlanta prison, requiring no parole, no probation, no repatriation of the $1/2 million in stolen money and apparent forgiveness of the income tax thereon. And then standing before the judge and swearing that there had been no deal made to procure the perjourous testimony. I must add Judge Winner characterized that same testimony as "lying by the clock". The man contradicted his own testimony 11 times in less than a hour he couldn't remember his lines. And that is only 9 of the 102 such acts, in fact its not even the worst 9. I haven't even mentioned IRS agents and DOJ attorneys bullying their way into a grade school to interrogate 7 and 9 year old children, or 3 Assistant US Attorneys and two IRS agents that were under a sequestration order conducting a meeting to collude on their testimony and when they were caught, protested they weren't discussing their testimony, that they were only discussing the "facts of the case". That of course begs a new question, "To what were they planning to testify, the NON FACTS", which is of course precisely what they then proceeded to do. In that instance they just lied. I know that because I was witness to the event as were dozens of other to include the court recorder and the clerk who testified to the event. My time before you is limited you'll have to read the remaining 91 for yourselves. But as you do so I would like you to remember something; the perpetrators thought these 102 events would be protected in the Secret Grand Jury Transcripts that are normally not available to the victim. We still don't know it all, because we still don't have the transcripts of over 50 sessions of the grand jury because the government claims they're lost. Most of what we know was discovered in 23 transcripts the perpetrators "attempted" to "lose" or "withhold" but had to produce them when caught. One must but wonder what must be contained in the 50 plus that are still supposedly lost. Of course we know that is a lie too. Their not lost, two years after the supposed "loss", the DOJ discovered something favorable to it and cited in its appeal of this case from two of the supposedly lost documents by page number and line number. That requires either the greatest memory known to man or the presumption that the lost documents are not lost at all but rather are still being withheld in flagrant contempt of 3 separate court orders from 2 separate judges in obvious obstruction of justice. If most of what we know was in the 23 sessions they turned over, what must be in the 50 they are still hiding? Another question, what must have occurred during the dozens of days in which the court recorder was instructed not to keep a record? As bad as these 102 acts are, and as much worse as we can presume the hidden 50 must be, at least they were recorded. What must have occurred when the same IRS agents/grand jury agents/ and the prosecutors little helpers testified and ordered that no record be kept? The recorder remained in the room, she was on the payroll, the cost was the same to the government, but no record was kept. That event becomes curiouser and curiouser when we realize that these were the same agents that lied to the jury on the record to get the Bank & its President indicted after the jury disclosed it was not inclined to do so. And this is routine it's standard operating proceedure. Don't take my word for it, take the IRS' and DOJ's word for it. They state on the record, "we do it all the time, we do it in every circuit" and then called in senior officials, Deputy Attorney Generals, to confirm that they do it all the time. Ultimately Attorney General William French Smith stated on 60 Minutes that he concurs with the correctness of their procedures which must mean that he too knows they do it all the time. If that's not enough look at their appeal in my case. Not once in the entire appeal do they even attempt to deny committing any one of the 102 acts, they just make excuses, they simply plead it's OK, we did it and it's OK. In fact the appeal, which had to be approved at the highest levels, seems to plead further, it seems to plead, "We are Tax Division, Department of Justice we dispense justice, we're not subject to it. We do it all the time, and we get away with it all the time, that proves it's okay, to do!" Well, I don't think it's okay and don't believe 235 million Americans think it's okay. I trust 535 members of Congress don't think its okay either but I suppose we are going to find out. The I have presented you with the list of the 102 crimes. DOJ and the IRS see nothing wrong with the acts so neither makes any attempt to stop such acts. I suppose the reverse must also be true, if the Senate Oversight Committee coesn't take measures to stop such acts we must presume it's because it sees nothing wrong with them either, and we will then know: 1. The Senate approves of prosecutors in the grand jury, 2. You approve of tricking defense witnesses into not appearing, arresting them of they try, and threatening their jobs and freedom if they don't say what the prosecutor wants to hear, 3. That you approve of the press and federal judges being gagged if they say naughty things about government employees, 4. That you approve of government attorneys deciding to "make their career" by putting innocent citizens in prison and if they can't put him there to use all the awesome power of the government to break the citizen as punishment. In fact all Americans will know you approve of all the 102 events described in the list. Later during these hearings you are going to hear excuses, excuses for these acts of the DOJ and IRS. I've heard them all. I suggest there are no excuses. The listed 102 crimes occurred with the results described therein. After hearing all the excuses, cites of case histories, rules of law, and loopholes which the IRS & DOJ will present, ask yourself what difference does it make? There is no excuse sufficient to negate the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments? If the law is violated, in order ot inforce the law, there is no law. When you have digested it all, I believe you will act. I believe you will require corrections. If SO you, I, and the world knows that no bureaucracy ever has, isn't now, and never will police itself, therefore any correction must come from you. I suggest the minimum correction will require the appointment of an independent council to prosecute these admitted crimes. I suggest he be empowered to reduce in rank, dismiss from government service, or file criminal charges as he may deem appropriate. I suggest that any less is no remedy at all and will result in less than a week after the closing of this hearing, business will be "as usual" at the DOJ & IRS. I further suggest that the only way to prevent it from reoccurring is to pass a new law, one that permits the citizens of this nation equal access to the courts against the government and its employees as the government now has against its citizens. A law permitting citizens to sue individual government agents if they violate the law and Constitution. are Only when every IRS and DOJ employee knows they too subject to the laws of this land, that they too can be disbarred for illegal acts, that they too can be held liable for their acts, and in fact that they too can be incarcerated for their 7 crimes will there be any real these illegal acts. And why not? deterrent to the commission of If we citizens commit so much as a "civil" mistake on our civil taxes this congress has passed laws permitting the. collection of the amount of our error, plus interest, plus a 100% penalty. Why should public servants, who should be held to higher standards, be held to any less. When the citizens have special investigators recourse they will no longer need or prosecutors or Senate Oversight Committees. We'll handle the matter ourselves. I Ladies and gentlemen I think it's time for a change. think admitted 102 crimes later that it has become more than a little difficult to swallow the "King can do no wrong theory". I think it's time to place corrective measures in the hands of the citizens. I think it's time to assure our bureaucratic employees adhere to the law. I think it's time to obey our Constitution. think. That's what I think. That's what I believe all Americans I suppose in the next few weeks we are going to find out what this committee thinks. |