Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

For, in the first place, there may be inscribed in the cylinders similar prisms, the convex surfaces of which approach more nearly to the convex surfaces of the cylinders than by any the same given difference (2. Cor. 2.); and it may easily be shown that the convex surfaces of these prisms are to one another always in the same ratio, viz., as the squares of their principal edges (II. 43. Cor. 1.), which are equal respectively to the axes of the cylinders: therefore, the convex surfaces of the cylinders are to one another in the same ratio (II.28.), viz., as the squares of their axes. And, in the same manner, because there may be inscribed in the cylinders, similar prisms, the solid contents of which approach more nearly to the solid contents of the cylinders than by any the same given difference (1.Cor. 2.); and because the solid contents of these prisms are to one another always in the same ratio, viz., as the cubes of their principal edges (IV. 35.), which are equal respectively to the axes of the cylinders, the solid contents of the cylinders are to one another in the same ratio (II. 28.), viz., as the cubes of their axes. Otherwise:

Let A, a represent the axes of two similar right cylinders, and R, r the radii of their bases. Then (3. Cor.) 2 RA, 2ra will represent their convex surfaces respectively, and (4. Cor. 1.) ≈ RA, ra their solid contents. But, because the cylinders are similar, (def. 3.) RA::ra; therefore (p. 47, Rule ii.) RA: Aa:: ra: a2, alternando (II. 19.) RA:ra:: A2: a2, and (p. 47, Rule ii.) 2 - RA: 2 ≈ra :: A: a2, that is, the convex surfaces of the cylinders are to one another as the squares of their

T

axes.

2

Again, because R: A::r: a, R A2 :: r2; a2 (II. 37. Cor. 4.), and (p.47, Rule ii.) RA: A3:: ra: a3; therefore, alternando (II. 19.) R2 A : r2 a :: A3 : a3, and (p. 47, Rule ii.) R2 A : r2 a:: Aa3; that is, the solid contents of the cylinders are to one another

as the cubes of their axes. Therefore, &c.

PROP. 6.

A right cone is greater than any inscribed pyramid, and less than any circumscribed pyramid; also the convex surface of the cone is greater than the convex surface of any inscribed pyramid, and less than the convex surface of any circumscribed pyramid.

The former part of the proposition is

manifest: the latter respecting the surfaces may be demonstrated as follows: Let VA be the axis and BCD the base of a right cone ; and, first, let EF be the base of any pyramid inscribed in the cone: the convex surface of the cone shall be greater than the convex surface of the inscribed pyramid.

B

For, if the axis VA be produced to V', so that A V' may be equal to A'V,'and if a right cone be described which shall have the axis V'A and the base B CD, it may be shown by coincidence that the convex surface of the latter cone V' B C D is equal to the convex surface of the first cone V B CD; and, because the triangles which form the convex surface of the inscribed pyramid V' E F have their sides equal respectively to the sides of the corresponding triangles which form the convex surface of the inscribed pyramid V E F (I. 4.), the former triangles are equal to the latter, each to each, and the whole convex surface of the pyramid V'EF is equal to the whole convex surface of the pyramid V E F. Therefore the convex surface of the cone VB CD is equal to half the convex surfaces of the two cones taken together; and the convex surface of the pyramid VEF is equal to half the convex surfaces of the two pyramids taken together. But the convex surfaces of the two cones taken together are greater than the convex surfaces of the two pyramids taken together (Lemma 2), because the former envelop the latter. Therefore (I. ax. 8.), the convex surface of the cone VBCD is greater than the convex surface of the inscribed pyramid VEF.

And by a similar demonstration applied to the adjoined figure, it may be shown that E

the convex surface of the cone is less than the convex surface of any circumscribed pyramid.

Therefore, &c.

PROP. 7.

V

D

F

Any right cone being given, two pyramids may be the one inscribed in the cone, and the other circumscribed about it, such that the difference of their con

vex surfaces, or of their solid contents, shall be less than any given difference.

Let V be the vertex of a right cone, ABD its base, and C the centre of the base. And, first, let P be the given difference of the surfaces; and let Q be the convex surface of some circumscribed pyramid. Then, because (as in III. 31.) a regular polygon may be inscribed in the circle ABD, the apothem CE of which approaches to the radius CD within any given difference, a polygon may be inscribed, such that CD2CE2 may be to CE2 in a ratio less than any assigned; less, therefore, than that of P to Q. Let A BFGH be such a polygon; and let a similar polygon KLMNO be circumscribed

[blocks in formation]

about the circle, so that the side K L may touch the circle in D (III. 27. Cor. 2.). Join VA, VB, &c., VK, V L, &c., and through E draw EU parallel to DV, to meet CV in U, and join UA, UB, &c.* Then, it may easily be shown, that the convex surfaces of the two pyramids, which have the points U, V, for their vertices, and the inscribed and circumscribed polygons for their bases, are made up of similar triangles, which are to one another in the same ratio, each to each, viz. that of CE2 to CD (II. 42. Cor.). Therefore, the convex surfaces of the pyramids are to one another in the same ratio (II. 23. Cor. 1.); and the difference of their convex surfaces is to that of the lesser pyramid as CD2-CE to CE (II. 20.), that is, in a less ratio than that of P to Q. But the convex surface of the lesser pyramid is less than the surface of the pyramid VABFGH

The lines UA, UB, &c. are omitted in the

figure.

(I. 26. Cor. and I. 12. Cor. 2.), and therefore by much more less than Q. Much more, therefore, is the difference of the convex surfaces less than P (II. 18.Cor.); and more still is the difference of the surfaces of the inscribed and circumscribed pyramids, which have the common vertex V, less than P.

Next, let S be the given difference of the solid contents; and let T be the solid content of some circumscribed pyramid. As before, let the regular polygon ABFGH be inscribed in the circle ABD, such that CD - CE may be to CE2 in a less ratio than that of S to T; let a similar polygon be circumscribed, and the inscribed and circumscribed pyramids completed. Then, because these pyramids have the same altitude, their solid contents are to one another as their bases, that is, as CE, CD (IV.32.): therefore, the difference of the contents is to that of the inscribed pyramid as CD2-CE to CE (II. 20.) that is, in a less ratio than that of S to T. Therefore, because the content of the inscribed prism is less than T, much more is the difference of the contents less than S (II. 18. Cor.).

Therefore, &c.

Cor. 1. Any right cone being given, a regular pyramid may be inscribed (or circumscribed), which shall differ from the cone in convex surface, or in solid content, by less than any given difference; for the difference between the cone and either of the pyramids, whether in surface or in content, is less than the difference of the two pyramids (6.).

Cor. 2. Any two similar right cones being given, similar regular pyramids may be inscribed (or circumscribed), which shall differ from the cones in convex surface, or in solid content, by less than any the same given difference.

PROP. 8.

The convex surface of a right cone is equal to half the product of its slant side by the circumference of its base.

For, if half this product be not equal to the convex surface of the pyramid, it must either be greater or less than that surface. If greater, it must also be greater than the convex surface of some circumscribed pyramid (7. Cor. 1.)greater, that is, than half the product of the slant side of the cone by the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon (I. 26. Cor.), which is the base of the pyramid; for the triangles which form the convex surface of the pyramid have for their bases the sides of the circum

scribed polygon, and the lines drawn from their common vertex to the points of contact (which lines are each a slant side of the cone) perpendicular to those bases respectively (III. 2. Cor. 1. and IV. 4.). But this is impossible, be cause the circumference of the base of the cylinder is less than the perimeter of the circumscribed polygon. Again, if half this product be less than the convex surface of the cone, it must be less also than the convex surface of some inscribed pyramid (5. Cor. 1.)—less, that is, than half the product of the perpendicular drawn from the vertex to a side of the inscribed regular polygon which is the base of the pyramid, by the perimeter of that polygon; which is impossible, because not only is the slant side greater than the perpendicular (IV. 8.), but the circumference of the base of the cylinder is also greater than the perimeter of the inscribed polygon.

Therefore, half the product in question is neither greater nor less than the convex surface of the pyramid; that is, it is equal to it.

Therefore, &c.

Cor. If R is the radius of the base of a right cone, and S its slant side, the convex surface of the cone is RS (III. 34. Scholium.).

PROP. 9.

The solid content of a right cone is equal to one-third of the product of its

base and altitude.

This proposition is demonstrated in the same way as the preceding. If a third of the product in question exceed the content of the cone, it must likewise exceed the content of some circumscribed pyramid (7. Cor. 1.); but this is impossible, because the latter (IV.32. Cor. 1.) is equal to a third of the product of its altitude, which is the same with that of the cone, by its base, which is greater than the base of the cone. And if, on the other hand, it be less than the content of the cone, it must likewise be less than the content of some inscribed pyramid (7. Cor. 1.); but this is impossible, because the latter (IV. 32. Cor. 1.) is equal to a third of the product of its altitude, which is the same with that of the cone, by its base, which is less than the base of the cone.

Therefore, a third of the product in question is equal to the content of the

cone.

Therefore, &c.

Cor. 1. If R is the radius of the base of a right cone, and A its altitude, the

solid content of the cone is ≈ RoA (III. 34. Scholium.).

Cor. 2. (Euc. xii. 10.). If a right cylinder and a right cone have the same base and the same altitude, the cone shall be a third part of the cylinder (4.).

Cor. 3. If a right cone and a pyramid have equal bases and altitudes, the cone shall be equal to the pyramid (IV. 32. Cor. 1.).

Cor. 4. (Euc. xii. 11 and 14.) Right cones which have equal altitudes are to one another as their bases; and right cones which have equal bases are to one another as their altitudes: also, any two right cones are to one another in the ratio which is compounded of the ratios of their bases and altitudes (IV. 32. Cor. 2.).

PROP. 10. (Euc. xii. 12.).

The surfaces of similar right cones are as the squares of the axes; and their solid contents are as the cubes of the axes.

For, in the first place, there may be inscribed in the cones similar pyramids, the convex surfaces of which approach more nearly to the convex surfaces of the cones than by any the same given difference (7. Cor. 2.); and the convex surfaces of these pyramids are, to one another, always in the same ratio, viz. as the squares of the sides of their bases (II. 42. Cor. and II. 23. Cor. 1.), that is, as the squares of the radii of the circumscribing circles (III. 30.), or (II. 37. Cor. 4.) as the squares of the axes of the cones, for the axes of the cones

are to one another as the radii of their

bases (def. 6.); therefore the convex surfaces of the cones are to one another in the same ratio (II. 28.), viz. as the squares of their axes.

And, in the same manner, because there may be inscribed in the cones which approach more nearly to the solid similar pyramids, the solid contents of contents of the cones than by any the because the solid contents of these pyrasame given difference (7. Cor. 2.); and mids are to one another always in the same ratio, viz. as the cubes of the sides of their bases (IV. 35.), or (IV. 27. Cor. 3.) as the cubes of the axes of the cones; the solid contents of the cones

are to one another in the same ratio (II. 28.), viz. as the cubes of their axes.

Otherwise:

Let A, a represent the axes of two similar right cones; R, r the radii of their bases; and S, s their slant sides. Then (8. Cor.) RS and rs will represent

contents.

their convex surfaces respectively, and (9. Cor. 1.) RA, r a their solid But, because the cones are similar (def. 6.) R: A::r: a; and because the slant sides S, s are the hypotenuses of right-angled triangles, which have the sides A, R and a, r about the right angles proportional (II. 32.) S; A .sa: therefore (II. 37. Cor. 3.), RS A2::rs: a2, alternando (II. 19.) RS rs: A2: a, and (p. 47, Rule ii.) T RS: rs: A2: a2, that is, the convex surfaces of the cones are as the squares of their axes.

Again, because R: A; r: a, R2: A2 r2; a2 (II. 37. Cor. 4.), and (p. 47, Rule ii.) RA: A3: r2 a: a3: therefore alternando (II. 19.) R2 A: r2 a :: A3 as, and (p. 47, Rule ii.) R2 A:

T r2 a :: A3: a, that is, the solid contents of the cones are to one another as the cubes of their axes. Therefore, &c.

PROP. 11.

The convex surface of a frustum of a right cone is equal to the product of its slant side by half the sum of the circumferences of its two bases; and its solid content is equal to the sum of the solid contents of three cones, which have the same altitude with the frustum, and for their bases its two bases, and a mean proportional between them.

Let A BD, abd, be the bases of the frustum of a cone, which has the vertex

B

D

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

V. Draw any slant side V a A; from A draw any straight line AE perpendicular to VA (I. 44.); suppose AE to be taken equal to the circumference A B D, and join VE, and through a draw a e parallel to AE (I. 48.), to meet VE in e. Then, because the circumferences A BD, abd, are as their radii (III. 33.), that is, as VA, V a (II. 31.), that is, again, as A E, ae (II. 31.), and that AE is equal to ABD, ae is equal to abd (II. 18.). Now the triangle V AE is equal to the convex surface of the cone VABD (6.), because (I. 26. Cor.) it is equal to half the product of V A the slant side, and A E, which is equal to the circumference A BD; and, for the like reason, the triangle Vae is equal to the convex surface of the cone Vabd; therefore, the convex surface of the frustum is

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

pyramid, having its base L M N equal to the base ABD, and in the same plane with it, and its vertex K in the same parallel to the base with the vertex of the cone. Then, because the cone and pyramid have equal bases, and the same altitude, Let the plane abd be produced to cut they are equal to one another (9. Cor. 3.). the pyramid in the triangle Imn: then, because I mn is similar to L M N (IV. 12. and IV. 15.), they are to one another as I m2 and L M2 (III. 42. Cor.), that is, (II. 37. Cor. 4.) as K12 and K L2, or (IV. 14.) as Va2 and V A2: but the bases abd and ABD are to one another in the same ratio (III. 33. and II. 31.), and LMN is equal to ABD: therefore, also, Imn is equal to a b d (II. 12. and II. 18.), and (9. Cor. 3.) the cone Vabd is equal to the pyramid Klmn. Therefore (I. ax. 3.) the frustum of the cone is equal to the frustum of the pyramid. But the latter (IV. 33.) is equal to the sum of three pyramids, having the same altitude with the frustum, and for their bases the bases of the frustum, and a mean proportional between them; and (9. Cor. 3.) each of these pyramids is equal to a cone having the same altitude and an equal base. Therefore, also, the frustum of the cone is equal to the sum of three cones, having the same altitude with it, and for their bases the bases of the frustum, and a mean proportional between them..

Therefore, &c.

Cor. If a straight line A a be made to revolve about any axis, VC, in the same plane with it, the surface generated by such straight line shall be equal to the product of the straight line and the circumference generated by its middle point F.

For the generated surface is that of a cylinder if the line be parallel to the axis; and, in every other case, that of a frustum of a right cone. In the former case, the reason is sufficiently manifest (3.). In the latter, it may be shown, that if FG be drawn parallel to AE (in the first figure of the proposition) to meet V E in G, FG will be equal to the circumference generated by the point F: also, because VF is equal to half the sum of VA and Va, FG is equal to half the sum of AE and ae (II. 30. Cor. 2.); therefore the circumference generated by the point F is equal to half the sum of the circumferences A B D, abd; and hence by the proposition, the convex surface of the frustum, that is, the convex surface generated by the line A a is equal to the product of A a and the circumference generated by its middle point F.

Scholium.

Although the propositions of this section have, for greater brevity and simplicity, been stated and demonstrated only with regard to the right cylinder and right cone, it will be found that Props. 2. and 7. apply equally to the oblique cylinder and oblique cone, to which the demonstrations may be without difficulty adapted, and hence it may be demonstrated, almost in the words of Props. 4. 9. 11. 5. and 10. that the solid content of an oblique cylinder is equal to the product of its base and altitude; the solid content of an oblique cone to onethird of the product of its base and altitude; the solid content of a truncated oblique cone to the sum of the solid contents of three cones, having the same altitude with it, and for their bases its two bases, and a mean proportional between them; and, lastly, that the surfaces of similar oblique cylinders and cones are to one another as the squares of their axes, and their solid contents as the cubes of the axes. With regard to the convex surface of the oblique cylinder, it may likewise be shown in a similar manner (see IV. 29. Scholium) to be equal to the product of its side (or axis) by the perimeter of a plane section perpendicular to it.

It remains to observe, with regard to Props. 3. and 8., that the remarkable property by which the convex surfaces of the cylinder and cone have been defined, viz. that of containing, the first, straight lines parallel to a given straight line, and the other straight lines diverging

from a given point, leads to another property of those surfaces, from which the measures assigned in Props. 2. and 6. may be very readily inferred. This property is, that they are developable, that is, they may be conceived to be unfolded and spread out upon a plane, Now, it is easy to perceive, that if the surface of a right cylinder be so developed, it will form a rectangle, which has for its base the circumference of the circle, which is the base of the cylinder, and for its altitude the altitude of the cylinder; whence it follows, that the convex surface of a right cylinder is equal to the product of its altitude by the circumference of its base. In like manner the developed surface of a right cone will form a circular sector, the arc of which is equal to the circumference of the base of the cone, and its radius to the slant side; whence it follows, that the convex surface of a right cone is equal to half the product of its slant side by the circumference of its base.

SECTION 2.-Surface and content of the sphere.

PROP. 12.

If an isosceles triangle ABC be made to revolve about an axis which lies in the same plane with it and passes through the vertex A, and if a perpendicular AD be drawn from the vertex to the base, and EF be that portion of the axis which is intercepted by perpendiculars drawn to it from the extremities of the base; the convex surface generated by the base shall be equal to the product of E F by the circumference of a circle having the radius AD; and the solid generated by the triangle shall be equal to one-third of the product of this surface by the perpendicular AD.

First, of the surface generated by the base BC. This is evidently the convex surface of a truncated cone having the axis E F, and EB, FC for the radii of its bases; and is therefore (11. Cor.) equal to the product of BC, and the circumference generated by its middle point D, that is, (if D G be drawn parallel to BE to meet EF in G) the circumference which has

D

B

[ocr errors]

A

F

the radius DG. Now, if E L be drawn

« ForrigeFortsett »