The Railway and Municipal Board Act (1906) and way and other corporations, BY JOHN G. FARMER, B.C.L. of Osgoode Hall, Barrister-at-Law 약 TORONTO: THE CARSWELL COMPANY, LIMITED LAW BOOK PUBLISHERS 30 ADELAIDE STREET EAST 1907 CAN/O. 352.IF Entered according to the Act of the Parliament of Canada, in the year one thousand nine hundred and seven, by the Carswell Company, Limited, in the Office of the Minister of Agriculture. 57111370 Cornwell TABLE OF CASES. A. Abdon v. C. P. Ry. Co., 88. Alberta, etc., Co., Chan Dy Chea v., 88. Allen v. Ont. & Ry. Co., 16. Ardah v. Toronto Ry. Co., 135. Armstrong and James Bay Ry. Co., re, 50, 53. Arthur v. G. T. R., 46, 67. Atlantic, etc., Ry. Co., Evans v., 49. Atty.-Gen. v. Mersey Ry. Co., 31. B. Bacon v. G. T. R., 72. Bank of Montreal, Sweeney v., 20. Begg v. Toronto Ry. Co., 136. Bennett v. G. T. R., 91. Benson v. Imperial Starch Co., 19. Berlin, Town of, and Berlin, etc., Ry. Co., Re, 128. Bretram & Sons v. H. & D. Ry. Co., 59. Bickford v. Chatham, 94. Bicknell v. G. T. R., 111. Birnie v. Toronto Milk Co., 16. Blake, Toronto Brewing & Malting Co. V., 15. Black v. Ont. Wheel Co., 62. Blackley v. Toronto Ry. Co., 136. Bourgouin v. Montreal, etc., Ry. Co., Brant Milling Co. Case, 112. Branch Lines, C. P. Ry. Co., Re, 31. Breeze v. Midland Ry. Co., 114. Brenner v. Toronto Ry. Co., 90, 135, 136. Bridgwater Cheese Co. v. Murphy, 29. Brierly and T. H. & B. Ry. Co., re, 33, 46, 49, 53. British v. Couper, 10. Brooke v. Toronto Belt Line, 47. Burris v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co., 87. |