Sidebilder
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

A similar mode of solution may be applied to continued surds or expressions of the form

√a+√a+ √a, &c.,

the value of which, though apparently infinite, is always determinable by a certain equation, and in some cases in a real integral or fractional quantity; for, putting

x=√a+√a+ √a, &c.,

we shall have, by squaring both numbers,

x2=a+Va+va+, &c.,

the latter part of which is evidently equal to the original surd; whence

x2=a+x, or x2—x=a .. x=1± √ita,

where, if a=2, the expression becomes

√2+√2+ √2+, &c., =2 or —1.

433. The process for developing any quantity, x, in a continued fraction,

[blocks in formation]

ing the greatest whole number contained in x, b the greatest whole number contained in x', c the greatest whole number contained in x'', &c.

The numbers a, b, c, &c., being found, it is evident that if x', x'', &c., are replaced by their values, the required development is obtained, viz.,

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Let it be required to convert 19 into a continued fraction.

[blocks in formation]

√19+4.

= √19-4

3

[blocks in formation]

By proceeding in this way we shall obtain the following:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

VII being the same as x1, it is evident that, omitting the 4, the greatest integral part of √19, the quotients 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 8, already found, will always return again in the same order to infinity.

Should it be required to convert the square root of 19 into a series of converging fractions without first reducing it to the continued form, they may be obtained, after the method before employed, from the integral parts of the above results only.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

(5) √45.

1

Ans. Quotients, ' 7, 1, 2, 4, 5, 1, 2.

3'

1 7 8 23 100 523 623 1769 Convergents, 3' 22' 25' 72' 313' 1637' 1950' 5537' Ans. The quotients are 5, 1, 1, 3, 5, 3, &c.

[blocks in formation]

Ans. Quotients, 6, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 12, &c.

6 7 20 47 114 161 2046

Convergents, 1'1' 3' 7' 17' 24' 305*

434. The converse of the proposition stated in Art. 432 is true, viz., that the root of an equation of the second degree may be expressed in functions of the coefficients of the equation by continued fractions.

The general form of the equation of the second degree may be written

[blocks in formation]

in which b and c may be essentially negative. This may be put under the form

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

a2 being the greatest square contained in c, we have

or, putting c-a2=Y,

x2=z2-2az+a2= c;

... z2-2az=c—a2;

[blocks in formation]

and

γ

But since x=z—a, x=a+

γ

2a+za+, &c.

[blocks in formation]

+i+, &c.

Q. E. D.

The above result may be obtained in a more simple manner; thus, put

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

2a+za+, &c.,

which shows that the square root of any number which is the sum of a square, and of another number, is a continued fraction.

[blocks in formation]

435. Continued fractions furnish a method of resolving in whole numbers the indeterminate equation

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

In this equation a, b, c are whole numbers, and the first two are supposed to have no common factor. Let us conceive that we have developed the rela

tion E

into a continued fraction, and that we have calculated all the conb vergents; the last will be equal to this relation itself. Let us subtract from

a'

it the next to the last, which I represent by The numerator of the difference will be ab'—ba', and by the property of Art. 430 we have

ab'-ba' l...

=

Multiplied by c, this equality becomes

ax ±b'c+bx Fa'c=c;

[ocr errors]

(2)

then equation (1) is satisfied by taking x=±b'e, y=±a'c.

This solution being known, we know (Art. 161) that all the others are given by the formulas

x=±b'c-bt, y=Fa'c+at,

t designating any whole number whatever. We take the upper or lower sign according as we have + or in the equality (2), or, what is the same thing,

α

according as the convergent is of an even or uneven rank.

Let there be the equation

b

EXAMPLE.

261x-82y=117.

[blocks in formation]

The equation, then, is satisfied by making x=11x117=1287 and y=35 X117=4095; then, finally, the general values of x and y are

x=1287+82t, y=4095+261t.

If we divide 1287 by 82, and 4095 by 261, we find 1287-82 × 15+57 and 4095 261 X 15+180. Then, observing that t is any whole number whatever, we can write more simply

x=57+82t, y=180+261t.

436. The following theorem will be found useful in the resolution of indeterminate equations of the second degree.

Let p2-Aq=±D be an indeterminate equation, in which DVA. I

assert, that if this equation is resolvable, the fraction

the fractions which converge toward √Ā.

Р

will be found among

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Po

Let be the converging fraction which precedes, and which is of such a nature that the sign of 8 will be the same with that of D; it will remain to be proved that we have

Dq
9
< or D(q+2%)<p+q√Ã.
P+q√A 9+%'

δ

In the second member, instead of p, I put its value, q√A±; the inq equality to be proved can then be written thus:

(9+%)( √×D)+(2−9%) √ñ°>0.

But this inequality is manifest, since we have √A>D, q>%, and since the part (9—9%) √A, which is at least equal to VA, by itself surpasses

[ocr errors]

which is less than unity. then, will always be found in the fractions which

[ocr errors]

converge toward VA, so that it will only be necessary to develop √A in a continued fraction, and to calculate the converging fractions which result, in order to have all the solutions in entire numbers of the equation

x2-AyD,

D being <VA.

METHOD OF RESOLVING IN RATIONAL NUMBERS INDETERMINATE EQUATIONS OF THE SECOND DEGREE.

437. Let the proposed general equation be

ax2+bxy+cy2+dx+ey+f=0,

in which x and y are the indeterminates, and a, b, c, d, e, f the given entire numbers, positive or negative. We first derive from this equation the following:

2ax+by+d=√ [(by+d)2—4a(cy2+ey+f)].

If we make, to abridge, the radical =t, b2-4ac-A, bd—2ae=g, d-4af=h, we shall have the two equations

2ax+by+dt,
Ay2+2gy+h=t2.

If we multiply the last of these equations by A, and make, again, Ay+g =v, g2—Ah=B, we shall have the transformed equation

v2-At-B.

Reciprocally, if we can find values of v and t which satisfy the equation

[ocr errors]
« ForrigeFortsett »