IN the days of Chivalry, whose spirit, I am sure, still lingers with us, though its forms may have passed away, the prelude to a peaceful tournament, or joute de plaisance, was the salutation of each other by the combatants. Be it frankly said, that in the pages which are to follow, an effort will be made in some degree to dislodge Mr. Swinburne from that seat of critical judgment which he occupies with such gallant confidence, with such waving of plume and such clashing of shield. But before the lists are opened, let me salute, with something more than ceremonial courtesy, the volatile genius of the poet, and the solid accomplishments of the scholar. That premised, I will, without further preliminary, betake me to my task.

In the latest number of one of the ablest of monthly reviews, Mr. Swinburne, enlarging on a passage, rather cursory and incidental than definitive or judicial, inserted by M. Taine at the close of his brilliant survey of English poetry, institutes a comparison between Mr. Tennyson and Alfred de Musset. With Mr. Swinburne's opening remark, every one must agree. It is distinctive of this age, he says, that the greatest of the great writers who were born about the opening of the century, are still working with splendid persistence. It was affirmed by Menander that those the gods love die young. Is it because the gods themselves are dead, that the heavenly favourites are nowadays permitted to exceed even the scriptural span of life? Be this as it may, to Mr. Tennyson, with peculiar aptness, may be addressed the lines of Wordsworth, inspired by a very different personage—

66

Thy thoughts and feelings shall not die,
Nor leave thee when gray hairs are nigh,
A melancholy slave;

But an old age serene and bright,
And lovely as a Lapland night,
Shall lead thee to thy grave."

More appropriate still perhaps, for the moment, would be an excerpt from Alfred de Musset himself, whom the gods loved not well enough either to cut off in the flower of his youth, or to leave hanging till he had achieved maturity. Mr. Swinburne, no doubt, knows the lines by heart

"Mais comment fais-tu donc, vieux maître, Pour renaître ?

Car tes vers, en dépit du temps,
Ont vingt ans.

"Si jamais ta tête qui penche
Devient blanche,

Ce sera comme l'amandier,
Cher Nodier:

"Ce qui le blanchit n'est pas l'âge,
Ni l'orage;

C'est la fraiche rosée en pleurs
Dans les fleurs."

To this survival of power in Mr. Tennyson, Mr. Swinburne pays homage after his fashion. Who could possibly withhold it? The Revenge, The Battle of Lucknow, and most of all Rizpah, show that, even as in the days of Locksley Hall, ancient founts of inspiration well through Mr. Tennyson's fancy yet; serving to remind us that Nature rejoices in the occasional violation of her own laws, that roses are not altogether unknown in November, and that even when the snowdrop whitens the ground, the lark will sometimes carol up to heaven.

To the wedded strength and sadness in Rizpah Mr. Swinburne offers ample testimony, and this is how he

does it

words are

"Nothing more piteous, more passionate, more adorable for intensity of beauty, was ever before this wrought by human cunning into the likeness of such words, as powerless to praise. Any possible commentary on a poem of this rank must needs be as weak and worthless as the priceless thing which evoked it is beautiful and strong."

this is so.

I confess I am disposed to feel that But Mr. Swinburne, disregarding his candid avowal of what is worthless, proceeds with the commentary

"But one which should attempt by selection or indication to underline, as it were, and to denote the chiefest among its manifold beauties and glories, would be also as long and as wordy as the poem is short and reticent. Once or twice in reading it a man may feel, and may know himself to be none the unmanlier for feeling, as though the very heart in him cried out for agony of pity, and hardly the flesh could endure the burden and the strain of it, the burning bitterness of so keen and divine a draught. A woman might weep it away and be all right' again-but a man born of woman can hardly be expected to bear the pity of it."

There is more to the same effect; indeed two whole pages, in the course of which we are assured that 66 never assuredly has any poor penman of the humblest order been more inwardly conscious of such impotence in words to sustain the weight of their intention than am I at this moment of my inability to cast into any shape of articulate speech, the impression and the emotion produced by the first reading of Tennyson's Rizpah;" that "the poet never lived on earth whose glory would not be heightened by the attribution of this poem to his hand;" that any one who hesitated to affirm as much must be "either cancerous with malevolence or paralytic with stupidity;" that now at least "there must be an end for ever on all hands

to the once debateable question whether the author can properly be called in the strictest sense a great poet; and, finally, that "there must be an end for ever, and a day beyond at least, of a question which once was even more hotly debateable than this, the long contested question of poetic precedence between Alfred Tennyson and Alfred de Musset."

To all who, like myself, admire Rizpah vastly, and who never doubted that Mr. Tennyson was a larger poet than Alfred de Musset, the above is, in a sense, consolatory. But I confess that, even when first perusing it, and not having yet reached what follows, the note of panegyric struck me as strained, not to say forced, and I had an uncomfortable sort of feeling that somebody would have to pay prodigal eulogium. To borrow a line the expense of this Mr. Swinburne himself quotes— "Cette promotion me laisse un peu rêveur."

Even when Mr. Swinburne praises, and no one praises more liberally, I do not know how it strikes other people, but he always gives me the idea that he is directing his panegyric at somebody who is not being panegyrised; in other words, that he is, to say the least, as much bent upon scarifying some one who is not mentioned, as on complimenting the who is. Even in the passage just reproduced, with the chant over the glories of Mr. Tennyson, is mingled a gibe at "wandering apes" and "casual mules." This, I say, put me upon my guard. "Is it conceivable," I said to myself, "that Rizpah, fine, forcible, and effective as it is, should cause all this difference in a man's estimate of

person

Mr. Tennyson as a poet? Is it possible that any Englishman at least, should have had to wait till this time of day, to discover that any comparison of claims between the two men must be unprofitable in itself, as well as unfair to the memory of the lesser poet'?" Finally, and to speak my whole mind with perfect candour, it struck me that, splendid of its kind surely some exaggeration in saying, as Rizpah undoubtedly is, there is "If this be not great work, no great work was ever, or will ever be done in verse by any human hand"; and that quently done work fully as good as it, Mr. Tennyson himself has not unfreand, me judice, even better.

One had not to read much further to discern that these misgivings were

well founded. Somebody indeed had to pay for all the lavish praise of Rizpah, and it was the author of Rizpah himself. I felt sure I should come to the other side of the shield, the obverse hollows of all this embossed, and, if I may be permitted to say so, somewhat turgid appreciation; and come to it I did.

"There are whole poems of Mr. Tennyson's first period which are no more properly to be called metrical than the more shapeless and monstrous parts of Walt Whitman, which are lineally derived as to their form-if form that can be called where form is none-from the vilest example set by Cowley, when English verse was first infected and convulsed by the detestable duncery of sham Pindarics. At times, of course, his song was then as sweet as ever it has sounded since; but he never could inake sure of singing right for more than a few minutes or stanzas. The strenuous drill through which since then he has felt it necessary to put himself, has done all that hard labour can do to rectify this congenital complaint by dint of stocks and backboard he has taught himself a more graceful carriage.

It may be the highest imaginable sign of poetic power or native inspiration that a man should be able to grind a beauty out of a deformity or carve a defect into a perfection; but whatever may be the comparative worth of this peculiar faculty, no poet surely ever had it in a higher degree or cultivated it with more patient and strenuous industry than Mr. Tennyson. Idler men, or men less qualified and disposed to expend such length of time and energy of patience on the composition and modification, the rearrangement and recision and re-issue, of a single verse or copy of verses, can only look on at such a course of labour with amused or admiring astonishment, and a certain doubt whether the linnets, to whose method of singing Mr. Tennyson compares his own, do really go through the training of such a musical gymnasium before they come forth qualified to sing."

Everybody has heard of the operation described by Pope as "damning with faint praise." But damning with exaggerated praise is a new invention, and it is employed in Mr. Swinburne's paper, doubtless unintentionally, but with striking effect. As we shall see directly, it is not only on what Mr. Swinburne calls, "the crowning question of metre," that Mr. Tennyson is assigned a comparatively inferior place, but he is arraigned for his low estimate of women, for his

66

sympathy with princes, and for various other crimes and misdemeanours. Το say of Rizpah, never since the beginning of all poetry were the twin passions of terror and pity more divinely done into deathless words, or set to more perfect and profound magnificence of music," seems a poor setoff to the reproaches just cited, and still more to those that have yet to be set forth. There is no fear that any one-and Mr.. Tennyson himself, I should think, least of all-will place Rizpah quite in the same category with Edipus or Lear. But there is perhaps some little danger lest the inadvertent should believe, on Mr. Swinburne's authority, that Mr. Tennyson hits and maintains the right note only after the same sad drudgery and pain by dint of which we are told - with about equal accuracy

of

- poor Malibran was taught to sing. It is said that women of not very generous temperament will go out of their way to insist that a beautiful slattern dresses admirably, in order to be in a position plausibly to challenge her beauty. I am sure Mr. Swinburne is not purposely ungenerous; but in first extolling Mr. Tennyson to the skies for his poem Rizpah, and then decrying him almost below the ground for his defective ear, for his base estimate of women, and for his adulation of princes, he reminds me of the fable of the eagle who bore the tortoise aloft into heaven, and then let it fall to earth, in the hope of smashing its shell, and dining off the contents. If I remember rightly, the shell did not break after all, and the bird had to flap away as hungry as ever. In any case, after reading first the extravagant laudation, and then the yet more extreme obloquy contained in Mr. Swinburne's paper, I think everybody will agree that, to quote a line with which doubtless he is familiar, Mr. Tennyson deserved :

"Ni cet excès d'honneur ni cette indignité."

What is the full measure of "cette

indignité," will be seen by and by. But before passing to the other reproaches addressed by Mr. Swinburne to the Laureate, I should like to be allowed to say something about this question of singing, of ear, of what Mr. Swinburne calls "the crowning question of metre." It is not the first time Mr. Swinburne has assumed that he possesses infallible authority upon this point. Now he Now he must forgive me for remarking that though musicalness is unquestionably the most noticeable mark, and the most prominent quality, of his own verse, it is, for the most part, music of a particular kind. It is of the florid order, rather than of the stately; it is lyrical and Lydian, well calculated to soothe or to carry along, and sometimes enjoying the Lethean faculty of making those who read it forget to ask what it means, or indeed if it means anything very substantial. I will not say that Mr. Swinburne has adopted the principle, "Take care of the sound, and the sense will take care of itself." But he not unfrequently reminds one of this facile theory, and some of his imitators have adopted it without reserve. cannot say whether the story is accurate; but I remember being told that, on hearing a poem of Mr. Swinburne's read aloud, Mr. Tennyson quietly quoted a line of his own, from the Lotos Eaters ::

I

"Like a tale of little meaning, though the words seem strong."

I should be as unfair to Mr. Swinburne as Mr. Swinburne is to Mr. Tennyson, if I hinted that he has not done much work to which the above verse is altogether inapplicable. But he is at once the poet, the prophet, and the critic of what I may call, par excellence, the Lyrical School; and his idea of singing, his standard of ear, his touchstone of "the crowning question of metre," is associated with the great triumphs of lyricism pure and simple.

Now I trust I am not insensible to

the exquisite melody, the delicious dactyls of Shelley, of De Musset, and, I will add, of Mr. Swinburne himself. But the Lyricists pure and simpleand certainly, as far as verse is concerned, De Musset never became anything else-are, after all, the flentes in limine primo. They are children, or at most they are boys. Every poet, no doubt, should pass through that preliminary stage; but he should not stay there. There should come a time when the puerile voice changes, and henceforward is recognised as masculine. It should acquire a passionate composure, and like the spirit that informs it, should be, not only spacious as the air, not only soaring and circumambient as the sky, but deep and sonorous as the sea. De Musset, es Mr. Swinburne half allows, never underwent this solemn transformation; and it is perhaps, on that very account, that all of us find him, within limits, so irresistibly attractive. He is the poet of the transitional period between boyhood and manhood.

"Mes premiers vers sont d'un enfant, Les seconds, d'un adolescent."

He never got beyond the sweet sick springtime of the soul, when it searches for what it is never to find, when it strains towards what it never can clutch, when the "flowers appear on the earth, the time of the singing of the birds is come, and the voice of the turtle is heard in our land; the fig-tree putteth forth her green figs, and the vines with the tender grape give a good smell," and the whole want and utterance of the heart is embodied in the cry, "Arise, my love, my fair one, and come away!" He who has not "passé par là," will never be much of a poet; but he who does not pass beyond it, will never be a great one. Yet this season of the "Seng of Songs" is the eternal quest of the young, the eternal regret of the old. Nothing can superannuate its charm, nothing can quench its fascination. At the climax of his strength and his fame, Byron could not help exclaiming, “The days of our youth are the days of our

glory," and M. Taine was doubtless under the spell of this periodically recurring sentiment, this irresistible return, ever and anon, to one's first love, when, for a brief moment, flinging sober criticism and just judgment to the winds, he asked if it is not pardonable to prefer the author of Les Nuits to the author of the Idylls.

Just one word more about " singing." Speaking of the earlier poems of De Musset, Mr. Swinburne observes: "Of all thin and shallow criticisms, none ever was shallower or thinner than that which would describe these firstlings of Musset's genius as mere Byronic echoes." True enough. But, he goes on to say, "in that case they would be tuneless in their original, whereas they are the notes of a singer who cannot but sing."

This is not the first time we have been treated to this opinion. Once before Mr. Swinburne has spoken of Byron as a singer who could not sing. I ventured to reply, at the time, that he was a singer who could not or I would not shriek. It is necessary to repeat the protest. No doubt Byron shows, as a rule, rather volume of voice than flexibility; and from a determination not to resemble excellent models, but to strike out a line for himself a passion for pseudo-originality, from which lesser poets that could be named, since his time, have likewise suffered-his blank verse is generally detestable. But Shelley did not find out that Byron could not sing; neither did Scott, nor Goethe, nor Lamartine, nor Pushkin, nor Leopardi, nor De Musset himself. He speaks of the "chant" of Byron as that of un cygne," and compares the echo of his song to "le torrent dans la verte vallée." Mr. Swinburne's discovery is strictly his own, and I should advise him not to press it. Indeed it would not be difficult to dispose of it by the method of reasoning familiarly known as a reductio ad absurdum. Mr. Swinburne affirms that the question of metre is the crowning question, in other words,

66

that the greatest poets are the most musical, and most people would be disposed to agree with the dictum, if the question what music is were first satisfactorily settled. But Mr. Swinburne will have it that Byron cannot sing, whereas it is quite certain that Mr. Swinburne can. Therefore Mr. Swinburne is a greater poet than Byron which, everybody will allow, is absurd. Q. E. D.

I daresay larks do not find much music in the thunder. But they have the sense to be silent when they hear the roll of that untrembling diapason that makes all things tremble.

To speak the plain truth, we are threatened, just at present, with too much of what Mr. Swinburne means by "singing." Does he not remember the following passage in the Fourth Book of Paradise Regained ?—

"There shalt thou hear and learn the secret power

Of harmony, in tones and numbers hit
By voice or hand, and various-measured

"High actions and high passions best describing."

Sheer lyricism just now is over much the mode. It is all very nice and pleasant in pleasant in its way, and within bounds, but one can have too much of a good thing, and one does not want poetry to become vox et preterea nihil. It is a fashion, doubtless, that will pass. If it does not, I fear people will begin to say of poetry what some one said of operatic music, Ce qui ne vaut pas la peine d'être dit on le chante, and we shall require Wagner in literature to denounce the meaningless fioriture of musical bards bent on recalling the most irrelevant flourishes of Donizetti. Mr. Tennyson never does, and has never done, that.

a

The assertion that Mr. Tennyson