V. Massachusetts Ben. Ass'n, 38 Fed. 625: § 25, n. 2; Wren v. Annin, 34 Fed. 435: § 71a, n. 1; Wong Kim Ark, In re, 71 Fed. 382: | Wotherspoon Wood v. Drake, 70 Fed. 881: § 107, n. 4; § 107, n. 7; § 107, n. 8; Wood v. Dummer, 30 Fed. Cas. 435, 3 Mason 308: § 132, n. 21; § 137, n. 6; Wood v. Gold, 30 Fed. Cas. 441, 4 Wood v. Paine, 66 Fed. 807: § 57 n. 3; Wood v. Wood, 5 Paige 596: § 120 n. 2; Woodfin v. Phoebus, 30 Fed. 289: § 58 n. 1; § 122, n. 5; Woodman v. Ely, 2 Fed. 839: § 96, n. 5; § 96, n. 7; Woodman v. Latimer, 2 Fed. 842: § 96, n. 6; Woodruff v. New York & N. E. R. Co., 59 Conn. 63, 20 Atl. 17: $51, n. 4; Woodruff v. Wallace, 3 Okl. 355, 41 Pac. 357: § 51, n. 8; Woodrum v. Clay, 33 Fed. 897: § 133, n. 2; § 140, n. 4; § 146, n. 3; Woodside v. Ciceroni, 35 C. C. A. 177, 93 Fed. 1: § 87, n. 4; Woolf v. Chisolm, 30 Fed. 881, 24 Blatchf. 405: § 38, n. 6; § 157, n. 11; Woolridge v. McKenna, 8 Fed. 650: World's Columbian Exposition v. Wright v. Phipps, 58 Fed. 552: § 199, n. 20; Wright v. Schneider, 32 Fed. 705: Wright v. Wells, 30 Fed. Cas. 716, Wyman v. Mathews, 53 Fed. 678: Wy Shing, In re, 36 Fed. 553, 13 Ind. 568, 47 N. E. 147: § 51, n. 8; Yarbrough, Ex parte, 110 U. S. 651, 4 Sup. Ct. 152, 28 L. 274: § 103, n. 30; Yarde v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 57 Fed. 913: § 84, n. 6; § 86, n. 2; § 86, n. 3; § 88, n. 3; § 99, n. 8; $157, n. 3; Yardley v. Dickson, 47 Fed. 835: § 111, n. 7; Yarnell v. Felton, 102 Fed. 369, 104 Fed. 161: § 110, n. 7; § 110, n. 9; $ 149, n. 6; § 150, n. 2; § 153, n. 4; Yawkey v. Richardson, 9 Mich. 529, 81 Am. Dec. 769: § 131, n. 1; Yearian v. Horner, 36 Fed. 130: § 144, n. 45; Yeatman v. Bradford, 44 Fed. 536: § 46, n. 2; Yellow Aster Min. & Mill. Co. v. Yick Wo v. Crowley, 26 Fed. 207, Young v. Bryan, 6 Wheat. 146, 5 L. Young v. Oakes, 104 Ga. 62, 30 S. Young v. Wempe, 46 Fed. 354: § 111, n. 7; Young Reversible Lock-Nut Co. v. Young Lock-Nut Co., 72 Fed. 62: § 71, n. 2; Youngstown Coke Co. v. Andrews | Yulee v. Vose, 99 U. S. 539, 25 L. 355: § 147, n. 2; Yung Sing Hee, In re, 36 Fed. 437, 7; Zebert v. Hunt, U. S. C. C. Dist. Ind. (unreported): § 207, n. 3; Zinkeisen v Hufschmidt, 30 Fed. Cas. 933, 1 Cent. Law J. 144: § 99, n. 8. THE REMOVAL OF CAUSES. CHAPTER I. THE CONSTITUTION AND GENERAL STATUTE. § 1. The judicial power of the United States is vested in its Courts. The judicial system of the United States has its origin in the Constitution of the United States. It is enacted by the Constitution: 1 "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.2 The Judges, both of the Supreme and Inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office." The first Congress passed the original judiciary act, approved September 24, 1789,3 which established the District Courts and the Circuit Courts of the United States, which are still a part of its judicial system. An act of March 3, 1891, established the nine Circuit Courts of Appeals which we now have.5 The existing statutes as to the removal of suits before trial, § 1. U. S. Const., Art. III, § 1. "To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court." U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 9. 81 St. at L. 73, entitled "An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States." 4 26 St. L. 826, 1 Supp. 901. 5 Their jurisdiction is discussed post § 210 and notes. Young v. Wempe, 46 Fed. 354: § 111, | Youngstown Coke Co. v. Andrews Yulee v. Vose, 99 U. S. 539, 25 L. 355: § 147, n. 2; Yung Sing Hee, In re, 36 Fed. 437, 13 Sawy. 482: § 116, n. 3; Zambrino v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co., 38 Fed. 449: § 136, n. 7; Zebert v. Hunt, U. S. C. C. Dist. Ind. (unreported): § 207, n. 3; Zinkeisen v. Hufschmidt, 30 Fed. Cas. 933, 1 Cent. Law J. 144: § 99, n. 8. THE REMOVAL OF CAUSES. CHAPTER I. THE CONSTITUTION AND GENERAL STATUTE. § 1. The judicial power of the United States is vested in its Courts. The judicial system of the United States has its origin in the Constitution of the United States. It is enacted by the Constitution: 1 "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.2 The Judges, both of the Supreme and Inferior Courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office." The first Congress passed the original judiciary act, approved September 24, 1789, which established the District Courts and the Circuit Courts of the United States, which are still a part of its judicial system. An act of March 3, 1891, established the nine Circuit Courts of Appeals which we now have.5 The existing statutes as to the removal of suits before trial, § 1. U. S. Const., Art. III, § 1. "To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court." U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 9. 81 St. at L. 73, entitled "An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States." 4 26 St. L. 826, 1 Supp. 901. Their jurisdiction is discussed post § 210 and notes. |