el al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.) RIKEL, Appellant, v. FERGUSON, Respondent. | SEYMOUR et al., Appellants, v. RINDSKOPF (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) Albert G. McDonald, for respondent. Hugo Hirsch, for appellant. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 5 N. Y. Supp. 774. BLODGETT et al., Appellants, v. ScOFIELD et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) Chas. E. Hughes, for appellants. Nathaniel Myers, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon opinion of BROWN, J., in Bernheimer v. Rindskopf, ante, 1074, (November 26, 1889.) All concur. See 41 Hun, 646. W. A. Sutherland, for appellants. Geo. P. CITY OF СопоES, Appellant, v. MORRISON, Decker, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 48 Hun, 615. FLEET, Appellant, v. KALBFLEISCH et al., (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur. See 43 Hun, 443. AVERY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) James F. Gluck, for appellant. Truman C. White, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 547. NEWHALL, Respondent, v. APPLETON et al., (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 4. KOEHLER, Respondent, v. FARMERS' & (Court of Appeals of New York. Dec. 20, 1889.) No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 6 N. Y. Supp. 470. In re Application of PEOPLE'S RAILROAD OF No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. Respondent. SPRING et al., Appellants, v. BROOKS et al., Repondents. WILTSIE, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF GREENBUSH, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis- (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.) Geo. W. Van Slyck, for appellants. F. A. Paddock, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of FOLLETT, C. J., in Haynes v. Brooks, ante, 1083, (November 26, 1889.) All concur. LAKE SHORE & M. S. R. Co., Respondent, v. BOARD SUPERVISORS ERIE COUNTY, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Nov. 26, 1889.) James M. Humphrey, for appellant. James Fraser Gluck, for respondent. ion. Dec. 10, 1889.) Levi S. Longley, for appellant. Esek Cowen, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. See 42 Hun, 654. BARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Dec. 10, 1889.) John A. Barhite, for appellant. John W. Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State. No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs. All concur. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, HUGGINS et al., Appellants, v. STATE, ReJJ., not sitting. See 41 Hun, 637. spondent. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Dec. 10, 1889.) John A. Barhite, for appellants. John W. Hogan, Dep. Atty. Gen., for the State. No opinion. Order affirmed, without costs. All concur. FREDERICKS, Respondent, v. DAVIDSON, Sheriff, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Dec. 17, 1889.) Wales F. Severance, for appellant. Francis B. Chedsey, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute ordered upon the stipulation against the appellant. All con cur. ROSE, Appellant, v. HAWLEY et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Division. Dec. 17, 1889.) Gratz Nathan, for appellant. Jas. M. Hunt, for respondents. No opinion. The motion is denied, with $10 costs, but without determining whether William Radford acquired any title to the premises by the deed given to him by the sheriff, and with leave to said Radford to file a brief on the argument of this appeal, provided he serves a printed copy thereof on the plaintiff's attorney five days before the argument. ment. All concur. See 45 Hun, 592. ALBERT, Respondent, v. SWEET et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York, Second Divis ion. Dec. 17, 1889.) Amasa J. Parker, Jr., for appellants. E. Winslow Paige, for respondent. No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. All concur. See 42 Hun, 654. |