Navigability. Economy Light & Co. v. United States, 256 U. S. 113, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 409, 65:847 Net income. Merchants Loan & T. Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 386, 65:751 Necessaries. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co. 254 U. S. 81, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 298, 65:516 Nonmailable. United States ex rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Pub. Co. v. Burleson, 255 U. S. 407, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 352, 65:704 Only. La Motte v. United States, 254 U. S. 570, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 304, 65:410 Peace. Kahn v. Anderson, 255 U. S. 1, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 224, 65:469 Givens v. Zerbst, 255 U. S. 11, Ct. Rep. 227, Possess. Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co. 254 U. S. 88, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 31, 65:151

41 Sup. 65:475

Prejudice. Berger v. United States, 255
U. S. 22, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 230, 65:481
Preparations. United States V. Etna
Explosives Co. 256 U. S. 402, 41 Sup.
Ct. Rep. 513,
65:1013

Price.

United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co. 255 U. S. 81, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 298, 65:516 Principal. Merchants Loan & T. Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U. S. 509, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 386, 65:751 Regular tariff rate. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. United States, 256 U. S. 205, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 456, Regulation. Director General of roads v. Viscose Co. 254 U. S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 151, Right. American Bank & T. Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 256 U. S. 350, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 499, 65:983

65:891 Rail499, 41 65:372

Secondary boycott. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443, 41 Sup.

Sell.

Ct. Rep. 172,

65:349

Jin Fuey Moy v. United States, 254 U. S. 189, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 98, 65:214 Side lines. Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Min. Co. 256 U. S. 18. 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 426, Strike. Duplex Printing Press Co. Deering, 254 U. S. 443, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep.

65:811

V.

65:349

172, Surplus. St. Louis-San Francisco .. Co.

65:151

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION.
Validity of Compensation Act, see
Constitutional Law, 20-24.
Burden of proof as to character of em-
ployment, see Evidence, 6.
See also Master and Servant, 3, 4.

WRIT AND PROCESS.

Writ of error, see Appeal and Error.
Jurisdictional question respecting serv-

ice of process, see Appeal and Er-
ror, 13, 14.

Federal jurisdiction of injunction suit, see Courts, 19.

Various particular writs, see Certiorari; Execution; Habeas Corpus; Injunction; Mandamus; Prohibition.

executed a writ by handing the same to a The return of a marshal that he person described as freight agent of the defendant railway company should be accepted as conclusive that he was agent of such company, as against the objection that the Federal government was, at the time the petition was filed, in control of the

railway company's line, where there is no such agent, and the suit is one upon a evidence that the person served was not reparation order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, the shipments for which reparation was allowed having been made prior to the taking over of the railroads by the government. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co. 256 U. S. 408, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 524, 65: 1020

1290

See Appeal and Error.

254, 255, 256 U. S.