Sidebilder
PDF
ePub

0;

r dr

[ocr errors]

2

Hence the equation in R becomes
d’R
2 dR 1 dR

cos o dR

1 d’R
+
+

+
dr2
72 102 pm sin 0 do + p sin" da?

dw
d2.rR d’R


cos d

1 d'R
..r
+ +

+

: 0. . dr2

dsin de sino A dw? Put cos 0 = Me

then d".R d

dR)

1 d’R
+
dr2
{(1 –m) +

: 0. du dus *1-* dwa Prop. To explain the method of expanding R in a series.

24. The expression for R becomes, when the polar co-ordinates are substituted,

[m2 +p"? — 2rr' {up' +VI - peV1 - pe' cos (w – w')}]"},
and this may be expanded into either of the series
Pon+ P, +......

+
+ P

....(1),
1 ro
+

+ .+P +.

a

12

1

[ocr errors]

12 r

[ocr errors]

o'itit

.......

r

or P. + P. +

i

r

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

[merged small][ocr errors]

where Po, P,... P... are all determinate rational and entire

, functions of us

V1 ? cosw, and V1 – p’sin w; and the same functions of u', W1-hecosw', and W1 - u" sin w'.

? The general coefficient P, is of i dimensions in

Mg N1 - r* cos w, and N1 – psin w. The greatest value of P; (disregarding its sign) is unity. For if we put ' Me" w w

[ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]

then P.= coefficient of d' in

0 – –

[ocr errors]

= coefficient of din

(1 +€ – 2c cos 4)"?, or (1 – cz)*(1-9)
(1+ + ** 13+ + ...
= 4(++) +B(++ A+

) 1)..

1 1.3
cz +

2.4

1c

cz? +...) (1+2 3+2.47

[ocr errors]

1.3 C3

+

z

+

=2 A cos i$ + 2B cos (i — 2)$+... A, B... being all positive and finite. The greatest value of this is; when =0. Hence P, is greatest when p=0. But then Pi= coefficient of c in (1 +0? — 2c)+ or (1 –c)-2

= coefficient of c' in 1+0+ 0 + ... ++ ...

=1.

i

,

1)

Hence 1 is the greatest value of Ps. It follows that the first or second of series (1) will be convergent according as r is less than or greater than r'.

To obtain equations for calculating the coefficients P., P., ...P.... substitute either of the series (1) in the differential equation in R in the last article, and equate the coefficients of the several powers of r to zero. The general term gives the following equation:

dP 1 d'P

du) *1-* dwa du

+i (+1)P;=0, }

1u by integrating which P, should be determined*. The series for R would then be known.

[ocr errors]

+

2

1

25. The functions P., P...P.... possess some remarkable

P properties which were discovered by Laplace. They are therefore called, after him, Laplace's Coefficients, of the orders 0, 1, ... i ... It will be observed that these quantities are definite and have no arbitrary constants in them. Laplace's Coefficients are therefore certain definite expressions involving only numerical quantities with u and w, r' and w'. Any other expressions which may satisfy the partial differential equation in P., which is called Laplace's Equation, may be designated Laplace's Functions to distinguish them from the “ Coefficients." The fundamental properties of these Coefficients and

* For the direct integration of this equation, see two Papers in the Philosophical Transactions for 1841 and 1857, by Mr Hargreave and Professor Donkin respectively.

" Functions we shall now proceed to demonstrate.

Prop. To prove that if Q: and R, be two Laplace's Co

i 1

2TT

eficients or Functions, then I "STO.Redudw = 0, when i and

S ;0

[ocr errors]

i are different integers.

26. By Laplace's Equation in the last Article d

1 i (i+1) Qi

du s 1 - Het doti

dQil

d'Q,

[ocr errors]

By a double integration by parts d

dQil

R; du=(1-u?)
dus
d

dRz
(
du

du

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

de since when w= () and 27, each of the functions Qi, Ri',

dw dR dw has the same values, because they are functions of ,

N1 - p2 cos w and V1 – sin w.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

2

[ocr errors]

=

[ocr errors]

1

27T

-1° 0

1

d

dR:
() du du) +

1 - pa dw"
' '

: dw ii+ by Laplace’s Equation.

Hence, | S* Q, R,dudo=0, when i and i' are unequal. When they are the same the equation becomes an identical one, and therefore gives no result.

This property is true also when i = 0, as may easily be shown by going through the process of the last Proposition, Q: being V. or a constant.

PROP. To prove that a function of u, V1 – u* cos w, and N1 - ? sin w, as F (u, w), can be expanded in a series of Laplace's Functions, provided that Flu, w) do not become infinite between the limits - 1 and 1 of y, and 0 and 27 of w.

27. This very important Proposition will occupy the present and five following Articles. Let peu' + V1 – H V1 – ” cos (w-w')=P; then by Art. 24,

μμ' + ' re.

(1 +0–2cp)*=1+Pc+P,c* + ...... +Pc' + ...... c being any quantity not greater than unity. Differentiate with respect to c, (1 +c* — 2cp)

c =P, +2Pc + ...... + iP.C

++ ......

[ocr errors]

2

12

P-C

1-1

2

=

Multiply this by 2c and add it to the former equation.

1-ca
(1+0 – 2cp)

=1+3Pc+5P,c+ + (2i+1) Pic; +... Now c being quite arbitrary we may put it=1. Then the fraction on the left-hand side of this equation vanishes, except when p=1; in which case the fraction on the left hand becomes apparently indeterminate: but it is in reality infinite. For when p=1,

1-C2 1+c (1+co – 2cp)' = (1-c)2=infinity, when c=1.

* When p=1, then

1- Mise' cos (W'-w) =

1-2μμ' + μμ V (1 – ?) (1 – mera) 1-μ' μ2 +μμ' and that this may not be greater than unity we must take re? + pe"? not greater than 2ur', or (u ~ M')? not greater than zero. Hence

and therefore cos (w-w)=1, and w'=w. These, then, are the values of ui' and w' which make p=1.

Hence, the series 1+3P, +5P, + + (21 +1) Pit ...... vanishes for all values of u and w, u' and w', except when u= ' and w=w', in which case the sum of its terms suddenly changes from zero to infinity.

12

VE

12

2

12 )

2

12

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

2

28. Upon this series depends the important property of Laplace's Functions which we are now demonstrating, and which gives them so great a value in the higher branches of analysis. In consequence of the discontinuity above pointed out, and also because the series becomes infinite in one stage of the variations of its variables, it has been considered by some to be unsatisfactory to deduce any properties from it. But the latter objection is entirely removed by the fact, that we do not use the series in its present form, but after being multiplied by small infinitesimal quantities which render the aggregate of its terms finite, preventing their accumulating to an infinite amount. With regard to the objection of discontinuity, there appears to be no sufficient ground for it. There is no question, that the property deduced (as enunciated

[ocr errors]

*

« ForrigeFortsett »