THE HOUSE OF LORDS: THE COURT OF APPEAL: THE CHANCERY, KING'S BENCH, AND PROBATE, DIVORCE, 'AND ADMIRALTY DIVISIONS OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE: AND CASES IN BANKRUPTCY. 1902. II EDW. VII. EDITOR-SIR FREDERICK POLLOCK, BArt. ASSISTANT EDITOR OF THE "WEEKLY NOTES "-MERYON WHITE, Esq. PART I. 99 LONDON: Printed for the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and tales, BY WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, LIMITED, DUKE STREET, STAMFORD STREET, S.E., AND GREAT WINDMILL STREET, W. · Abrahams (S.) & Sons, Limited, In re Accles, Limited, In re. Hodgson v. Accles, Limited . Hodgson v v. In re Accles, Limited Acetylene Illuminating Company v. United Alkali Company Actien-Gesellschaft für Motor und Motorfahrzeugbau, vorm. Cudell & Co., Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v. Aerators, Limited v. Tollitt. Aldam's Settlement, In re Alexander, Pardy's Mozambique Syndi cate v. Allan, Scottish Provident Institution v. (Revenue (Sc.)) Standard Life Assurance Com -" pany . (Revenue (Sc.)) Alliance Insurance Company, Robinson Gold Mining Company v. Alpha Company, In re. Ward v. Alpha Company Ward v. In re Alpha Company • American Steel and Wire Company v. Trustees Kantoor, Duder v. Anderson v. Berkley. Carr v. Andrews, In re. Andrews v. Andrews v. Andrews. In re Andrews Anglo-Continental Gold Reefs of Rho desia, Limited, Levi v. Arding, Foulger v. Railway Company Ashcroft r. Ashcroft Ashton v. Emanuel gation Automatic Machines, Limited, In re. Graafe V. Automatic Machines, TABLE OF CASES. 146 118 208 218 192 231 """ 66 Walter v. Assunta, The 97 Atlantic Transport Company, Rowson v. 220 tion Ground Company 208 Benjamin, Neville v. · · • 231 v. Bournemouth CorBennett, Holland v. poration. 126, 142 Berkley, Anderson v. . Hardy, v. In re Bickmore v. Dimmer Mann Birch v. Birch Resp.; London County Council, Apps. Resp. ; Midland Railway Company, Apps. v. Oxford Canal Navi (Revenue (Sc.)) Ball, In the Goods of. 170 226, 228 Balmoral Steamship Company, Apps.; Marten, Resp. Bank of England, Oliver v.. Bankes, In re. Reynolds v. Ellis Roden Company v. . 86, 103 Barlow's Contract, In re 232 Barnard Castle Urban Council v. Wilson 146 Barnett's Trusts, In re 61 100 Barron, Resp.; Willis, App.: 236 137, 222 v. Bartholomew v. Menzies. In re Weston • re Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton's Trade-marks, 17 36 90 103, 114, 133 · Baumann, Resp.; Beddington, App. Beeley v. Waterhouse. In re Side- 132 • Bellerby v. Rowland and Marwood's Steamship Company 93 26 76 81 223 72 69 PAGE 213 47 226 229 34 Bird and Highett's Contract, In re Bolton Estates, In re. Russell v. Meyrick 156 41 129 203 153 91 212 138 50 50 212 106 63 70, 90 138 100 214 Booth v. New Afrikander Gold Mining Company 212 109 56 Borovsky & Weinbaum, In re. Ex 214 214 51 233 126, 142 Boyce v. Paddington Borough Council. 201 Bozzelli's Settlement, In re. Bracken's Settlement, In re Bradford Corporation, Jeremiah Ambler & Sons, Limited v. . Bradshaw, In re. Bradshaw v. Bradshaw Bradshaw. İn 147 re Brad shaw · v. Widdrington Braisby, Hodgson v. In re Jaques Brazier v. Glasspool PAGE 15 102 118 185 156 52 91 120 201 43 109 109 Husey v. London Electric Supply Cor poration. • Huxtable, In re. Huxtable v. Crawfurd • Howes, In re. Ex parte White 55 32, 48 Settled Estates PAGE Jenks, Ex parte. In re Wallis • • • Bradford Corporation John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, In re. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v. John Griffiths Cycle Corporation 80 56 199 17 49 49 v. Crawfurd. In re Huxtable 193 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v. In 161 228 201 90 76 90 149 4 202 4, 23 148 148 11 218 230 124 24 Jackson, In the Goods of • James and Johnson, Rex v.. 157 Gold Mines, Limited, Resps. 115 Jarrah Timber and Wood Paving Cor poration v. Samuel. 140 174 220 220 12 68 128 60 147 9 70 Langton v. Scott. In re Scott Kelly's Directories, Limited v. Gavin and Lloyd's Keswick, Cackett v. Key (W.) & Son, Limited, In re Kingdon & Wilson, In re Kniveton v. Northern Employers' Mutual Indemnity Company Knowles, County Theatres and Hotels, Limited v. Lake, In re. Ex parte Cavendish Company, Fletcher v. Company, Lancashire Brick and Terra Cotta Company v. Lancashire Brick and Terra Cotta Company v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company Llewelyn v. Washington. In re Mad dock PAGE 91 146, 152 122 65, 101 Law Union and Crown Insurance Com- & Lawrence, In re. Ex parte The Trustee 154, 129 Lawley, In re. Zaiser v. Lawley 154, 195 Zaiser v. " In re Lawley. Leas Hotel Company, In re. Salter v. Leas Hotel Company In re 195 41 118 16 55 Leas Hotel Company 141 114 Legh's Settled Estate, In re 30 215 Lennox (Lady Gordon), Neale v. 80, 156 48 Levi v. Anglo-Continental Gold Reefs of Rhodesia, Limited 27 • Lewis, Smith v. In re Smith 46 46 206 McCheane v. Gyles (No. 2). 78, 80 M Farlane, App.; Maxwell, Resp. MacGuare v. Milligan 22 230 10 10 London County Council, Apps.; Attorney-General, Resp. • · Lloyd, In re. Lloyd v. Lloyd 16 London and Northern Bank, In re. 146 143 209 152 149 102 224 224 142 143 Resps.; West Ham Union, Apps. London Electric Supply Corporation, Husey v. · London Graving Dock Company, Union 235 118 McNair v. Cave. 67 Macpherson, Resp.; Dougan, App. McQuade, Herbert v. . Mappin v. Liberty & Co., Limited 80 Mare, In re. Mare v. Harvey - v. Harvey. In re Mare Marshall v. Rudeforth • Lord Advocate v. Balfour-Kinnear (Revenue (Sc.)) 170 Smith v. (Revenue (Sc.)) 167 106 165 App.; Stewart, Resp.. Loveridge, In re. Drayton v. Loveridge Drayton v. In re Loveridge 165 Lower Ward of County Lanark, Apps.; Rutherglen (Magistrates of), Resps.. 157 Luck, Hunt v. 14 Lurgan's (Lord) Case. In Metal re Constituents, Limited 43 67 206 209 McIver & Co., Limited v. Tate Steamers, 123 M'Millan, Malcolm v. (Workmen's Compensation (Sc.)) 186 McMurdo, In re." Penfield v. McMurdo 87. 112 87, 112 194 36 140 102 186 231 209 Maddock, In re. Llewelyn v. Washing ton • · Malcolm v. M'Millan (Workmen's Compensation (Sc.)) Mann, In re. Hardy v. AttorneyGeneral Marten, In re. Shaw v. Marten " 9 Shaw v. In re Marten Martin, Harburg India Rubber Comb Company v. Mason, Brooks v. App.; Ogden, Resp. Masterson, In re. Trevanion v. Dumas Maunder, In re. Maunder v. Maunder v. Maunder. In re Maunder. Maxwell, Resp.; M'Farlane, App. Medway Upper Navigation Company, Stagg v.. Mendelssohn, Ex parte. In parte. In re Mendel ssohn re Menzies, Bartholomew in Midland Railway Company, Apps.; Miles v. Wilson. In re Cozens PAGE 30 23 31 147 162 123 9 9 118 2 156 2 62 193 206 192 159 159 206 69 219 36 43 208 214 40 203 209 206 |
