United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volum 521United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 2000 |
Inni boken
Resultat 6-10 av 100
Side 146
... holding that merely a " significant possibility " of a future drop in a worker's wage - earning potential is rele- vant to a present benefits determination . As explained in Part I , the ultimate fact to be determined in an LHWCA ...
... holding that merely a " significant possibility " of a future drop in a worker's wage - earning potential is rele- vant to a present benefits determination . As explained in Part I , the ultimate fact to be determined in an LHWCA ...
Side 147
... holding today . Such a result , it seems to me , is exactly backwards . Not only does the " significant possibility " standard conflict with the APA , but the Court plucks it out of thin air . The Court seems to rely purely on its ...
... holding today . Such a result , it seems to me , is exactly backwards . Not only does the " significant possibility " standard conflict with the APA , but the Court plucks it out of thin air . The Court seems to rely purely on its ...
Side 152
... holding that a death penalty procedure permitting consideration of secret information relevant to the offender's character and record - there a presentence report not provided to the defendant - violates the Eighth Amendment ...
... holding that a death penalty procedure permitting consideration of secret information relevant to the offender's character and record - there a presentence report not provided to the defendant - violates the Eighth Amendment ...
Side 155
... holding that " where the defendant's future dangerousness is at issue , and state law prohibits the defendant's release on parole , the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the sentencing jury be informed that ...
... holding that " where the defendant's future dangerousness is at issue , and state law prohibits the defendant's release on parole , the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that the sentencing jury be informed that ...
Side 162
... holding is a narrow one - that " [ a ] procedure for selecting people for the death penalty which permits consideration of . . . secret informa- tion relevant to the character and record of the individual offender " violates the Eighth ...
... holding is a narrow one - that " [ a ] procedure for selecting people for the death penalty which permits consideration of . . . secret informa- tion relevant to the character and record of the individual offender " violates the Eighth ...
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, Volum 320 United States. Supreme Court Uten tilgangsbegrensning - 1944 |
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action advertising Aguilar Alaska Alaska Statehood Act Amendment amici curiae appellees apply argued asbestos assisted suicide Attorney authority BREYER Brief certiorari Circuit civil commitment claim Clause concluded concurring in judgment Congress constitutional constitutionality Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant Dinkum Sands dissenting District Court due process Due Process Clause effect Eleventh Amendment enacted Establishment Clause euthanasia Ex parte Young federal court federal law filed Fourteenth Amendment fraud free exercise Government Hendricks Ibid immunity injury interest islands issue jurisdiction JUSTICE JUSTICE SOUTER Kansas legislative legislature liability liberty litigation ment misappropriation theory O'CONNOR officers Opinion person petitioners physician-assisted suicide plaintiff present prison prohibition protection reason regulation relief religious requirement respondents Rule SCALIA settlement SOUTER speech Stat State's statute STEVENS submerged lands suit Supp supra T]he tion treatment United violation vote waters York