Northeastern Reporter, Volum 78Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio. |
Inni boken
Resultat 6-10 av 88
Side 47
JUDGMENT – LIEN - PROPERTY SUBJECTRIGHT TO REDEEM. The right of the
mortgagor of a leasehold interest to redeem from the foreclosure sale thereof is
not subject to levy and sale under execution, and hence a judgment rendered ...
JUDGMENT – LIEN - PROPERTY SUBJECTRIGHT TO REDEEM. The right of the
mortgagor of a leasehold interest to redeem from the foreclosure sale thereof is
not subject to levy and sale under execution, and hence a judgment rendered ...
Side 48
Consequently, no lien could attach to the leasehold interest by reason of the
rendition of any judgment against the Commerce Vault Conmpany subsequent to
the foreclosure Sale. Green V. Marks, 25 Ill. 221. The right of a creditor to redeem
...
Consequently, no lien could attach to the leasehold interest by reason of the
rendition of any judgment against the Commerce Vault Conmpany subsequent to
the foreclosure Sale. Green V. Marks, 25 Ill. 221. The right of a creditor to redeem
...
Side 49
In such case it is manifest that the surplus arising from a sale under one
execution could be applied by the sheriff upon Other executions which Were in
his hands and were liens upon the property at the time Such Sale Was made. In
First Nat.
In such case it is manifest that the surplus arising from a sale under one
execution could be applied by the sheriff upon Other executions which Were in
his hands and were liens upon the property at the time Such Sale Was made. In
First Nat.
Side 64
From that part of this judgment declaring that no lien existed upon the 62 acres
the defendant appealed to the Appellate Division, where the judgment, so far as
appealed from, was reversed by a divided Court, and a new trial Was granted.
From that part of this judgment declaring that no lien existed upon the 62 acres
the defendant appealed to the Appellate Division, where the judgment, so far as
appealed from, was reversed by a divided Court, and a new trial Was granted.
Side 79
Burns' Ann. St. 1901, § 1576, provides that an execution operates as a lien on the
personal property of the judgment debtor liable to be seized. Sections 756, 1582,
provide that property taken under execution may be returned to the execution ...
Burns' Ann. St. 1901, § 1576, provides that an execution operates as a lien on the
personal property of the judgment debtor liable to be seized. Sections 756, 1582,
provide that property taken under execution may be returned to the execution ...
Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale
Vi har ikke funnet noen omtaler på noen av de vanlige stedene.
Andre utgaver - Vis alle
Vanlige uttrykk og setninger
action affirmed agreed alleged amount answer appellant appellee applied assessment authority Bank bill bonds cause Cent charge circuit claim complaint condition Constitution construction contract corporation court damages death deed defendant determine directed duty easements effect election entered error evidence exceptions execution existing facts filed finding follows further give given grant ground held improvement injury instruction intended interest issue Judge judgment jury land lien limitations Mass matter means ment mortgage motion negligence Ohio operation opinion owner paid parties passed payment person petition plaintiff present proceedings purchase question railroad reason received record reference refused reversed rule statute street sufficient sustained taken thereof tion trial trust witness