...440; Peopte v. Brennan, 39 Barb. 522; 1 Wall. 272; Ex parte Selma d- Gulf RR Co., 45 Ala. 730. What is implied in a statute, is as much a part of it as what is expressed. — United States v. Babbitt, 1 Black. 61; Gelpcke v. Dvbuqw, 1 Wall. 221 ; see, also, section 20 of...

...traffic can be enforced. All these consequences are necessarily implied in these amendments, and " what is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." (US v. Babbit, 1 Black, p. 61; Gelpeck v. City of Dubuque, 1 Wallace, 221.) And this retrospective...

...to limit their liability, under the common law in any other manner, since 'that which is implied la a statute is as much a part of It as what is expressed.' Sutherland on Statutory Construction, §334; 25 RCL §229, pp. 982, 9S3; 36 Cyc. 1122, 1145. And the...

...Commission, but it plainly contemplates his presence, and BO implied!}" requires it. What is necessarily implied in a statute is as much a part of it as if it were expressed in so many words. State v. Harden, 62 W. Va., 313. This court is expressly empowered...

...the necessity of filling the jury with talesmen or issuing a special venire. However, what is plainly implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that Avhich is expressed, Doyle v. Doyle, 50 Ohio St. 330 [34 NE Rep. 166], Sawyer v. State, 45 Ohio...

...views that we have indicated, we think, are clearly implied by the statute, and what is implied in the statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. US •o. Babbit, 1 Black, 61 ; Supervisors of Wood Go. v. LacTcawanna I. & G. Co. 93 US 624. In the...