...SHAW, CJ, in Denny v. Dana, 2 Cush. 172: "The intent to prefer is essential, but every person is to be presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his own acts. It does not rebut this intent to show that the debtor has also another motive to the proceeding, namely,...

...necessarily prompts the conscious act and must be presumed. Hence it is universally held that every one is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his own intentional act. State v. Patterson, 116 Mo. 513, 22 SW 696; 16 OJ 1. c. 81. It follows that where...

...is a general principle which runs through all tort cases, which is gen•jral'y stated in this way : that a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts and that request for instruction therefore should be qualitied in that way. He is not responsible...

...that if he did not pay his poll tax until 1926 or 1927 that it was an inadvertence. But, gentlemen, a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his act. The statute says that if you are an inhabitant pay the poll tax. It is too late then to come and...

...imperil human life, the Jury may find that he intended murder, for It is a principle of law that every man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his own voluntary and willful acts. [4] In order to convict the prisoner of the crime of which he is charged,...

...for an assault with intent to commit murder, that an express intention shall bo proved. Every sane man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his unlawful acts. The intent may be inferred from the acts of the person charged with crime, as well as...

...then in force, makes the same point. But prima facie — and R. v. Steane makes this clear also— a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts, and the consequence of supplying essential material is that assistance is given to the criminal....

...v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 US 221, 227-228 (1963). Indeed, perhaps the oldest rule of evidence— that a man is presumed to intend the natural and probable consequences of his acts — is based on the common law's preference for objectively measurable data over subjective statements...

...enforce Its own standards. See United States v. Mintien, 304 F. Supp. 1305. 1311 (D. Md. 1969). Since a man Is presumed to Intend the natural and probable consequences of his conduct, the Complaint can fairly be read to allege that the Society "Intended" the discriminatory...

...enforce Its own standards. See United States v. Hintzei, 304 F. Supp. 1305. 1311 (D. Md. 1969). Since a man Is presumed to Intend the natural and probable consequences of his conduct, the Complaint can fairly be read to allege that the Society "Intended" the discriminatory...