 | Anthony A. D'Amato - 1995 - 412 sider
...nominally the same with that of the king of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...raising and regulating of fleets and armies — all of which, by the Constitution under consideration, would appertain to the legislature. One of the strongest... | |
 | Harry G. Summers - 1995 - 280 sider
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and the naval forces, as first General and Admiral of the confederacy; while that of the British King extends... | |
 | John Hart Ely - 1993 - 260 sider
...wrote: The President is to be commander-in chief of the army and navy of Ihe United Slates. |This| would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of Ihe military and naval forces, as first general and admiral of (he Confederacy, while that of Ihe British... | |
 | Daniel N. Hoffman - 1997 - 318 sider
...individuals, and it emphasized that in its view no constitutional rights of Americans were at stake. ing more than the supreme command and direction of the...as first general and admiral of the confederacy." 22 As late as 1850, the Supreme Court avowed that "the power of the President. . . was simply that... | |
 | John P. Kaminski, Richard Leffler - 1998 - 244 sider
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great-Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...Constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature.1" The Governor of New- York on the other hand, is by the Constitution of the State vested... | |
 | Brien Hallett - 1998 - 212 sider
...be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States. In this respect his authority.. . would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...Constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature. In short, it is the demands of war itself, not the philosophical demands of democratic... | |
 | Louis Fisher - 1998 - 332 sider
...reasoned that the president was less threatening than the king of England because the monarchical power "extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies."132 The American Constitution vests those powers solely in Congress. Madison counseled against... | |
 | Joseph M. Lynch - 2005 - 340 sider
...against the charge that it had been invested with monarchical powers: "[The president's military power] would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...and direction of the military and naval forces,... while that of the British King extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of... | |
 | Richard J. Ellis - 1999 - 340 sider
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, and first general and admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the declaring... | |
 | Jeffery A. Smith - 1999 - 337 sider
...navy" and "the direction of the operations of war."75 The commander in chief designation, he said, "would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces."76 The president was not given authority over civilian journalists. When exercising their specified... | |
| |
It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first general and admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating... 
