 | 1899 - 804 sider
...Supreme Court in the case of The Atlantic Works v. Brady, (CD, 1883, 214; 23 OG, 1330; 107 US, 200:) The design of the patent laws is to reward those who...knowledge and makes a step in advance in the useful arts. Snch inventors are worthy of all favor. It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1899 - 812 sider
...Court in the case of The Atlantic Works v. Brady, (CD, 1883, 214; 23 OG, 1330; 107 US, 200:) 'I'liK design of the patent laws is to reward those who make...some substantial discovery or invention which adds to onr knowledge and makes a step in advance in the useful arts. Such inventors are worthy of all favor.... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1901 - 1504 sider
...Corning т., Burden, 14: 883. As to abandonment of invention, see note to Fennook v. Dialogue, 7: 827. invention which adds to our knowledge, and makes a step in advance in the useful arts. It was never their object to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of... | |
 | General Electric Company - 1914 - 1324 sider
...or engineering skill is distinctly shown, is unjust in principle and injurious in its consequences. The design of the patent laws is to reward those who...useful arts. Such inventors are worthy of all favor. It is never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a... | |
 | Albert Henry Walker - 1904 - 906 sider
...or engineering skill is distinctly shown, is unjust in principle and injurious in its consequences. The design of the patent laws is to reward those who...useful arts. Such inventors are worthy of all favor. It is never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1918 - 508 sider
...found in Railroad Supply Co. v. Hart Steel Co., (193 Fed. Rep., 418, and CP, 1915, 226; 217 OG, 699; 222 Fed. Rep., 261.) Clearly persuaded as we are that...and makes a step in advance in the useful arts. Such Inventions are worthy of all favor. It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1920 - 584 sider
...lacking Invention ; also anticipated by prior art devices. 8. SAME — DEVICE MUST INVOLVE INVENTION. The design of the patent laws is to reward those who make some substantial discovery which adds to our knowledge, etc. ; but it was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents - 1913 - 330 sider
...that the world be given unnirlhiag new and that the world be taught how to nxr. it." and again : ' "The design of the patent laws is to reward those who make xnnir- mthxtantial discovery or invention, which adds to our knowledge and makes a step in advance... | |
 | Horace Jewell Fenton - 1914 - 410 sider
...always important; but, as said by Mr. Justice Bradley (107 US, 200), it is not the object of the patent laws " to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of an idea." 3. It must be prior in time. That is, in case more than one person should apply for a patent... | |
| |
It is never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures. 
