 But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument...  The Northeastern Reporter - Side 3431898Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Thomas Starkie - 1833 - 864 sider
...any matter which came collaterally in question, although it was within the jurisdiction of the court, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment, as having constituted one of the grounds of that judgment (a). For it is obvious, that although the... | |
 | Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Frederick Watts - 1836 - 538 sider
...different purpose. But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter INCIDENTALLY cognizable, nor of any...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." This brief but comprehensive summary furnishes a rule for every case that any complication of circumstances... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1838 - 586 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable;...to be inferred by argument from the judgment. "It is certainly true, as a general principle, that a transaction between two parties in judicial proceedings... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1838 - 1358 sider
...the whole answer together, and as to the effect of an answer in Chancery against parties and privies. nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. " It is certainly true, as a general principle, that a transaction between two parties in judicial proceedings... | |
 | John William Smith - 1840 - 530 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | John William Smith - 1842 - 612 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | John Sidney Smith - 1842 - 766 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgraent.(2)[a] (1) Tucker v. Wilkins,' 4 Sim. 241. (2) Judgment of De Grey.CJ in Duchess of Kingston's... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 1072 sider
...question, although it was within the jurisdiction of the court ; nor of any matter incidently cognisable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment, as having constituted one of the grounds of that judgment. (6) For it is obvious, that although the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Edward Younge, John Collyer - 1843 - 800 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the spiritual court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | Jeremy Bentham - 1840 - 362 sider
...is not evidence, even between the same parties, " of any matter which came collaterally in question, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment."* By the words not evidence, lawyers sometimes mean one thing, sometimes another: here, however, not... | |
| |
