 But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument...  The Northeastern Reporter - Side 3431898Uten tilgangsbegrensning - Om denne boken
 | Austin Abbott - 1880 - 928 sider
...another purpose; 3. But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment.1 1 Duchess of Kingston's Onse, 20 How. St. Tr. 888, ec 2 Smith's L. Саз. 609 ; Canjolle... | |
 | 1881 - 740 sider
...collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognisable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." ViceChancellor Knight-Bruce said, " It is, I think, to be collected that the rule against re-agitating... | |
 | Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1882 - 896 sider
...Justice, conclusive evidence) "of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce said, "It is, I think, to be collected that the rule, against re-agitating... | |
 | 1884 - 884 sider
...jurisdiction is evidence of " any matter which comes collaterally in question though with" in their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judg" ment"(l). There is nothing technical or peculiar to the law of England in the rule as so stated.... | |
 | Great Britain. Magistrates' cases - 1882 - 688 sider
...collaterally in question though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognisable nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." Knight-Bruce, VC, said : " It is I think to be collected that the rule against re-agitating matter... | |
 | John Bouvier - 1883 - 876 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which ctime collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable,...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Duchess of Kingston's case, 20 Howell, St. Tr. 538 ; 2 Smith, Lead. Cas. 424 ; and see the authorities... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1883 - 734 sider
...jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which comes collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. 1 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 528. In Whole v. Whole, 71 111. Pittard et al. v. Foster. 510, the court say, upon... | |
 | Lancelot Feilding Everest, Edmund Strode - 1884 - 600 sider
...exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred (xx) by argument from the judgment." The following comments are made upon this in Phillipps on Evidence... | |
 | 1885 - 1040 sider
...that no judgment "is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable;...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." Id. These exceptions have frequently received the sanction of the courts. Lewis' Appeal, 67 Pa. St.... | |
 | Straits Settlements. Supreme Court - 1885 - 886 sider
...the same parties upon the same matter, and not upon any matter which come collaterally in question nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Besides, whether the judgment would be available in another suit or not, I conceive that the Legislative... | |
| |
