...an Injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligent or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances, still it Is not necessary that the particular Injury should have been foreseen,...

...injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It was such аз might or ought to have been foreseen. In the light of the attending circumstances." 16 Am. & Eng. Ene. Law, 436. Now, by the rules of the company In proof, cars left on sidings are required...

...v. Kellogg, 94 US 476, 24 L. Ed. 256; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Deselms, 212 US 177, 53 L. Ed. 463. "But it is generally held that, in order to warrant...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, supra. Our court said, in Gage v. Harvey, 66 Ark. 68: "In determining...

...proximate cause, the Supreme Court in Milwaukee, etc. Railway Co. v. Kettogg, 94 US 469, at page 475 said : But it is generally held, that, in order to warrant...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. It is well known that time is an important factor in modern business. Where a shipment of shingles...

...successive instruments. Pulaski Gas Light Co. v. McClintock, 97 Ark. 584. It is generally held, however, that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence,...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Milwaukee, etc., Ry. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 476, 24 L. Ed. 256; Gage v, Harvey, 66 Ark. 68; St. Louis,...

...injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances, but it is not necessary that the particular injury which did happen should have been actually foreseen....

...negligence of another, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. St. Louis, IM & S. Ry. Co. v. Bragg, 69 Ark. 402; St. Louis, IM & S. Ry. Co. v. Buckner, 89 Ark. 58;...

...that "it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequences of the negligent and wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances." When the instructions which were given are read together, as they should...

...injury as is shown to have been the natural and probable consequence of the negligent act — such as ought to have been foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances. (Glover v. L. cfe SWR Co., LR, 3 QB, 25 ; Milwaukee R. Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US, 469.) Applying this rule,...

...negligence of another it must appear that the injury was1 the natural and probable consequence thereof, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of attending circumstances." It should have been foreseen by appellant that its failure to keep its waiting...