 | Charles Monfort Lindsay - 1904 - 204 sider
...is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable (a). But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter... | |
 | Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (U.S.). Conference - 1904 - 212 sider
...1899 (the Negotiable Instruments Law), a holder of a negotiable promissory note who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect to all parties prior to the latter,... | |
 | Edward Voigt, Charles Voigt - 1904 - 836 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud, duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respects... | |
 | Kentucky - 1904 - 384 sider
...to d*'ectsject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud °r illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all... | |
 | Michigan - 1905 - 754 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | North Carolina, Thomas Brown Womack, Needham Y. Gulley, William R. Rodman - 1905 - 1412 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Albert Sidney Bolles - 1905 - 224 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defences as if it were non-negotiable; but a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Robert Emmet Bunker, Michigan - 1905 - 392 sider
...110 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS IN GENERAL. if it were non-negotiable.1 But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.2... | |
 | Emilius Oviatt Randall - 1906 - 238 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1906 - 442 sider
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
| |
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any... 
